Multimodal CT Provides Improved Performance for Lacunar Infarct Detection

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Kolominsky-Rabas PL,
   3. Weber M,
   4. Gefeller O, et al

   . Epidemiology of ischemic stroke subtypes according to TOAST criteria: incidence, recurrence, and long-term survival in ischemic stroke subtypes: a population-based study. Stroke 2001;32:2735–40

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Wardlaw JM,
   3. Smith C,
   4. Dichgans M

   . Mechanisms of sporadic cerebral small vessel disease: insights from neuroimaging. Lancet Neurol 2013;12:483–97

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Norrving B

   . Long-term prognosis after lacunar infarction. Lancet Neurol 2003;2:238–45

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1581–87

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   IST-3 collaborative group. The benefits and harms of intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator within 6 h of acute ischaemic stroke (the third International Stroke Trial [IST-3]): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012;379:2352–63

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Fuentes B,
   3. Martínez-Sánchez P,
   4. Alonso de Leciñana M, et al

   . Efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis according to stroke subtypes: the Madrid Stroke Network data. Eur J Neurol 2012;19:1568–74

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Pantoni L,
   3. Fierini F,
   4. Poggesi A

   . Thrombolysis in acute stroke patients with cerebral small vessel disease. Cerebrovasc Dis 2014;37:5–13

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Chalela JA,
   3. Ezzeddine M,
   4. Latour L, et al

   . Reversal of perfusion and diffusion abnormalities after intravenous thrombolysis for a lacunar infarction. J Neuroimaging 2003;13:152–54

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Wessels T,
   3. Röttger C,
   4. Jauss M, et al

   . Identification of embolic stroke patterns by diffusion-weighted MRI in clinically defined lacunar stroke syndromes. Stroke 2005;36:757–61

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Young KC,
    3. Benesch CG,
    4. Jahromi BS

    . Cost-effectiveness of multimodal CT for evaluating acute stroke. Neurology 2010;75:1678–85

    CrossRef
11. 11.↵
    2. Hopyan J,
    3. Ciarallo A,
    4. Dowlatshahi D, et al

    . Certainty of stroke diagnosis: incremental benefit with CT perfusion over noncontrast CT and CT angiography. Radiology 2010;255:142–53

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Campbell BCV,
    3. Weir L,
    4. Desmond PM, et al

    . CT perfusion improves diagnostic accuracy and confidence in acute ischaemic stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013;84:613–18

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Yamada M,
    3. Yoshimura S,
    4. Kaku Y, et al

    . Prediction of neurologic deterioration in patients with lacunar infarction in the territory of the lenticulostriate artery using perfusion CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:402–08

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Poppe AY,
    3. Coutts SB,
    4. Kosior J, et al

    . Normal magnetic resonance perfusion-weighted imaging in lacunar infarcts predicts a low risk of early deterioration. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009;28:151–56

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Gerraty RP,
    3. Parsons MW,
    4. Barber PA, et al

    . Examining the lacunar hypothesis with diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke 2002;33:2019–24

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Fisher CM

    . Lacunes: small, deep cerebral infarcts. Neurology 1965;15:774–84

    CrossRef
17. 17.↵
    2. Lansberg MG,
    3. Thijs VN,
    4. O'Brien MW, et al

    . Evolution of apparent diffusion coefficient, diffusion-weighted, and T2-weighted signal intensity of acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:637–44

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Potter GM,
    3. Marlborough FJ,
    4. Wardlaw JM

    . Wide variation in definition, detection, and description of lacunar lesions on imaging. Stroke 2011;42:359–66

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Doege CA,
    3. Kerskens CM,
    4. Romero BI, et al

    . Assessment of diffusion and perfusion deficits in patients with small subcortical ischemia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1355–63

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Restrepo L,
    3. Jacobs MA,
    4. Barker PB, et al

    . Etiology of perfusion-diffusion magnetic resonance imaging mismatch patterns. J Neuroimaging 2005;15:254–60

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Brenner DJ,
    3. Hall EJ

    . Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2277–84

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. DeLong ER,
    3. DeLong DM,
    4. Clarke-Pearson DL

    . Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837–45

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Zhou X-H,
    3. Obuchowski NA,
    4. McClish DK

    . Comparing the accuracy of two diagnostic tests. In: Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine, 2nd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2011:165–92
24. 24.↵
    2. Barnhart HX,
    3. Williamson JM

    . Weighted least-squares approach for comparing correlated kappa. Biometrics 2002;58:1012–19

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Bezerra DC,
    3. Sharrett AR,
    4. Matsushita K, et al

    . Risk factors for lacune subtypes in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Neurology 2012;78:102–08

    CrossRef
26. 26.↵
    2. Mohr JP,
    3. Caplan LR,
    4. Melski JW, et al

    . The Harvard Cooperative Stroke Registry: a prospective registry. Neurology 1978;28:754–62

    CrossRef
27. 27.↵
    2. Nakamura K,
    3. Saku Y,
    4. Ibayashi S, et al

    . Progressive motor deficits in lacunar infarction. Neurology 1999;52:29–33

    CrossRef
28. 28.↵
    2. Tei H,
    3. Uchiyama S,
    4. Ohara K, et al

    . Deteriorating ischemic stroke in 4 clinical categories classified by the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project. Stroke 2000;31:2049–54

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. Shobha N,
    3. Fang J,
    4. Hill MD

    . Do lacunar strokes benefit from thrombolysis? Evidence from the registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. Int J Stroke 2013;8(suppl A100):45–49

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Mustanoja S,
    3. Meretoja A,
    4. Putaala J, et al

    . Outcome by stroke etiology in patients receiving thrombolytic treatment: descriptive subtype analysis. Stroke 2011;42:102–06

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Lee SJ,
    3. Saver JL,
    4. Liebeskind DS, et al

    . Safety of intravenous fibrinolysis in imaging-confirmed single penetrator artery infarcts. Stroke 2010;41:2587–91

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. Murphy A,
    3. So A,
    4. Lee TY, et al

    . Low dose CT perfusion in acute ischemic stroke. Neuroradiology 2014;56:1055–62

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Wintermark M,
    3. Sanelli PC,
    4. Albers GW, et al

    . Imaging recommendations for acute stroke and transient ischemic attack patients: a joint statement by the American Society of Neuroradiology, the American College of Radiology, and the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:E117–27

    Abstract/FREE Full Text