Narrowing the Expertise Gap for Predicting Intracranial Aneurysm Hemodynamics: Impact of Solver Numerics versus Mesh and Time-Step Resolution

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Meng H,
   3. Tutino VM,
   4. Xiang J, et al

   . High WSS or low WSS? Complex interactions of hemodynamics with intracranial aneurysm initiation, growth, and rupture: toward a unifying hypothesis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1254–62

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Kallmes DF

   . Point: CFD-computational fluid dynamics or confounding factor dissemination. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:395–96

   FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Kallmes DF

   . Identifying “truth” in computational fluid dynamics research. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:E122; author reply E123

   FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Krings T,
   3. Mandell DM,
   4. Kiehl TR, et al

   . Intracranial aneurysms: from vessel wall pathology to therapeutic approach. Nat Rev Neurol 2011;7:547–59

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Pease AF

   . Killers under attack. Pictures of the Future: The Magazine for Research and Innovation. Siemens AG; Fall 2010:79–81
6. 6.↵
   2. Valen-Sendstad K,
   3. Steinman DA

   . Mind the gap: impact of computational fluid dynamics solution strategy on prediction of intracranial aneurysm hemodynamics and rupture status indicators. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:536–43

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Valen-Sendstad K,
   3. Mardal KA,
   4. Steinman DA

   . High-resolution CFD detects high-frequency velocity fluctuations in bifurcation, but not sidewall, aneurysms. J Biomech 2013;46:402–07

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Hoi Y,
   3. Wasserman BA,
   4. Xie YJ, et al

   . Characterization of volumetric flow rate waveforms at the carotid bifurcations of older adults. Physiol Meas 2010;31:291–302

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Schubert T,
   3. Santini F,
   4. Stalder AF, et al

   . Dampening of blood-flow pulsatility along the carotid siphon: does form follow function? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1107–12

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Mortensen M,
    3. Valen-Sendstad K

    . Oasis: a high-level/high-performance open source Navier-Stokes solver. Comput Phys Commun 2015;188:177–88

    CrossRef
11. 11.↵
    2. Ferguson GG

    . Turbulence in human intracranial saccular aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1970;33:485–97

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Kurokawa Y,
    3. Abiko S,
    4. Watanabe K

    . Noninvasive detection of intracranial vascular lesions by recording blood flow sounds. Stroke 1994;25:397–402

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Peiffer V,
    3. Sherwin SJ,
    4. Weinberg PD

    . Does low and oscillatory wall shear stress correlate spatially with early atherosclerosis? A systematic review. Cardiovasc Res 2013;99:242–50

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Dolan JM,
    3. Kolega J,
    4. Meng H

    . High wall shear stress and spatial gradients in vascular pathology: a review. Ann Biomed Eng 2013;41:1411–27

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. White CR,
    3. Stevens HY,
    4. Haidekker M, et al

    . Temporal gradients in shear, but not spatial gradients, stimulate ERK1/2 activation in human endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2005;289:H2350–55

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Davies PF,
    3. Remuzzi A,
    4. Gordon EJ, et al

    . Turbulent fluid shear stress induces vascular endothelial cell turnover in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1986;83:2114–17

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Fry DL

    . Acute vascular endothelial changes associated with increased blood velocity gradients. Circ Res 1968;22:165–97

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Ventikos Y

    . Resolving the issue of resolution. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:544–45

    FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Roache PJ,
    3. Ghia KN,
    4. White FM

    . Editorial policy statement on the control of numerical accuracy. J Fluids Eng 1986;108:2

    CrossRef
20. 20.↵
    Journal of Fluids Engineering Editorial Policy. Statement on the Control of Numerical Accuracy. http://journaltool.asme.org/templates/JFENumAccuracy.pdf. Accessed September 1, 2014.
21. 21.↵
    2. Hodis S,
    3. Uthamaraj S,
    4. Smith AL, et al

    . Grid convergence errors in hemodynamic solution of patient-specific cerebral aneurysms. J Biomech 2012;45:2907–13

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Steinman DA,
    3. Hoi Y,
    4. Fahy P, et al

    . Variability of computational fluid dynamics solutions for pressure and flow in a giant aneurysm: the ASME 2012 Summer Bioengineering Conference CFD Challenge. J Biomech Eng 2013;135:021016
23. 23.↵
    2. Morinishi Y,
    3. Lund TS,
    4. Vasilyev OV, et al

    . Fully conservative higher order finite difference schemes for incompressible flow. J Comput Phys 1998;143:90–124

    CrossRef
24. 24.↵
    2. Antiga L,
    3. Steinman DA

    . Rethinking turbulence in blood. Biorheology 2009;46:77–81

    PubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Valen-Sendstad K,
    3. Piccinelli M,
    4. Steinman DA

    . High-resolution computational fluid dynamics detects flow instabilities in the carotid siphon: implications for aneurysm initiation and rupture? J Biomech 2014;47:3210–16

    CrossRefPubMed