Computerized Angiographic Occlusion Rating for Ruptured Clipped Aneurysms is Superior to Subjective Occlusion Rating

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Molyneux AJ,
   3. Kerr RS,
   4. Yu LM, et al

   ; International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–17

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Sindou M,
   3. Acevedo JC,
   4. Turjman F

   . Aneurysmal remnants after microsurgical clipping: classification and results from a prospective angiographic study (in a consecutive series of 305 operated intracranial aneurysms). Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1998;140:1153–59

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Wermer MJ,
   3. Rinkel GJ,
   4. Greebe P, et al

   . Late recurrence of subarachnoid hemorrhage after treatment for ruptured aneurysms: patient characteristics and outcomes. Neurosurgery 2005;56:197–204; discussion 197–204

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Lee JH,
   3. Kim SJ,
   4. Cha J, et al

   . Postoperative multidetector computed tomography angiography after aneurysm clipping: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005;29:20–25

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. el-Beltagy M,
   3. Muroi C,
   4. Roth P, et al

   . Recurrent intracranial aneurysms after successful neck clipping. World Neurosurg 2010;74:472–77

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. David CA,
   3. Vishteh AG,
   4. Spetzler RF, et al

   . Late angiographic follow-up review of surgically treated aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1999;91:396–401

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Wermer MJ,
   3. van der Schaaf IC,
   4. Velthuis BK, et al

   ; ASTRA Study Group. Follow-up screening after subarachnoid haemorrhage: frequency and determinants of new aneurysms and enlargement of existing aneurysms. Brain 2005;128:2421–29

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Tsutsumi K,
   3. Ueki K,
   4. Morita A, et al

   . Risk of aneurysm recurrence in patients with clipped cerebral aneurysms: results of long-term follow-up angiography. Stroke 2001;32:1191–94

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Elijovich L,
   3. Higashida RT,
   4. Lawton MT, et al

   ; Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) Investigators. Predictors and outcomes of intraprocedural rupture in patients treated for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the CARAT study. Stroke 2008;39:1501–06

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Sherif C,
    3. Gruber A,
    4. Schuster E, et al

    . Computerized occlusion rating: a superior predictor of aneurysm rebleeding for ruptured embolized aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1481–87

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Johnston SC,
    3. Dowd CF,
    4. Higashida RT, et al

    ; CARAT Investigators. Predictors of rehemorrhage after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) study. Stroke 2008;39:120–25

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Thornton J,
    3. Bashir Q,
    4. Aletich VA, et al

    . What percentage of surgically clipped intracranial aneurysms have residual necks? Neurosurgery 2000;46:1294–98; discussion 1298–1300

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Martin NA,
    3. Bentson J,
    4. Viñuela F, et al

    . Intraoperative digital subtraction angiography and the surgical treatment of intracranial aneurysms and vascular malformations. J Neurosurg 1990;73:526–33

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Rauzzino MJ,
    3. Quinn CM,
    4. Fisher WS

    . Angiography after aneurysm surgery: indications for “selective” angiography. Surg Neurol 1998;49:32–40; discussion 40–41

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Lot G,
    3. Houdart E,
    4. Cophignon J, et al

    . Combined management of intracranial aneurysms by surgical and endovascular treatment: modalities and results from a series of 395 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1999;141:557–62

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Taha MM,
    3. Nakahara I,
    4. Higashi T, et al

    . Endovascular embolization vs surgical clipping in treatment of cerebral aneurysms: morbidity and mortality with short-term outcome. Surg Neurol 2006;66:277–84; discussion 284

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Ogilvy CS,
    3. Hoh BL,
    4. Singer RJ, et al

    . Clinical and radiographic outcome in the management of posterior circulation aneurysms by use of direct surgical or endovascular techniques. Neurosurgery 2002;51:14–21; discussion 21–22

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Murphy M,
    3. Bell D,
    4. Worth RD, et al

    . Angiography postclipping and coiling of cerebral aneurysms. Br J Neurosurg 2005;19:225–28

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Yu SC,
    3. Wong GK,
    4. Wong JK, et al

    . Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: significant benefits in clinical outcome and reduced consumption of hospital resources in Hong Kong Chinese patients. Hong Kong Med J 2007;13:271–78

    PubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Sherif C,
    3. Marbacher S,
    4. Fandino J, et al

    . 3D computerized occlusion rating of embolized experimental aneurysms using noninvasive 1.5T MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:661–66

    Abstract/FREE Full Text