Shear Stiffness of 4 Common Intracranial Tumors Measured Using MR Elastography: Comparison with Intraoperative Consistency Grading

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Iuchi T,
   3. Saeki N,
   4. Tanaka M, et al

   . MRI prediction of fibrous pituitary adenomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1998;140:779–86 doi:10.1007/s007010050179 pmid:9810444

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Pierallini A,
   3. Caramia F,
   4. Falcone C, et al

   . Pituitary macroadenomas: preoperative evaluation of consistency with diffusion-weighted MR imaging—initial experience. Radiology 2006;239:223–31 doi:10.1148/radiol.2383042204 pmid:16452397

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Yamamoto J,
   3. Kakeda S,
   4. Shimajiri S, et al

   . Tumor consistency of pituitary macroadenomas: predictive analysis on the basis of imaging features with contrast-enhanced 3D FIESTA at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:297–303 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3667 pmid:23928139

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Muthupillai R,
   3. Lomas DJ,
   4. Rossman PJ, et al

   . Magnetic resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves. Science 1995;269:1854–57 doi:10.1126/science.7569924 pmid:7569924

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Muthupillai R,
   3. Ehman RL

   . Magnetic resonance elastography. Nat Med 1996;2:601–03 doi:10.1038/nm0596-601 pmid:8616724

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Kruse SA,
   3. Rose GH,
   4. Glaser KJ, et al

   . Magnetic resonance elastography of the brain. Neuroimage 2008;39:231–37 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.030 pmid:17913514

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Venkatesh SK,
   3. Yin M,
   4. Ehman RL

   . Magnetic resonance elastography of liver: technique, analysis, and clinical applications. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;37:544–55 doi:10.1002/jmri.23731 pmid:23423795

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Murphy MC,
   3. Huston J 3rd.,
   4. Jack CR Jr., et al

   . Decreased brain stiffness in Alzheimer's disease determined by magnetic resonance elastography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;34:494–98 doi:10.1002/jmri.22707 pmid:21751286

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Murphy MC,
   3. Curran GL,
   4. Glaser KJ, et al

   . Magnetic resonance elastography of the brain in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease: initial results. Magn Reson Imaging 2012;30:535–39 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2011.12.019 pmid:22326238

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Streitberger KJ,
    3. Sack I,
    4. Krefting D, et al

    . Brain viscoelasticity alteration in chronic-progressive multiple sclerosis. PLoS One 2012;7:e29888 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029888 pmid:22276134

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Streitberger KJ,
    3. Wiener E,
    4. Hoffmann J, et al

    . In vivo viscoelastic properties of the brain in normal pressure hydrocephalus. NMR Biomed 2011;24:385–92 doi:10.1002/nbm pmid:20931563

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Freimann FB,
    3. Streitberger KJ,
    4. Klatt D, et al

    . Alteration of brain viscoelasticity after shunt treatment in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neuroradiology 2012;54:189–96 doi:10.1007/s00234-011-0871-1 pmid:21538046

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Murphy MC,
    3. Huston J 3rd.,
    4. Glaser KJ, et al

    . Preoperative assessment of meningioma stiffness using magnetic resonance elastography. J Neurosurg 2013;118:643–48 doi:10.3171/2012.9.JNS12519 pmid:23082888

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Streitberger KJ,
    3. Reiss-Zimmermann M,
    4. Freimann FB, et al

    . High-resolution mechanical imaging of glioblastoma by multifrequency magnetic resonance elastography. PLoS One 2014;9:e110588 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110588 pmid:25338072

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Kawaji H,
    3. Koizumi S,
    4. Sakai N, et al

    . Evaluation of tumor blood flow after feeder embolization in meningiomas by arterial spin-labeling perfusion magnetic resonance imaging. J Neuroradiol 2013;40:303–06 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2013.04.005 pmid:24095290

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Sakai N,
    3. Koizumi S,
    4. Yamashita S, et al

    . Arterial spin-labeled perfusion imaging reflects vascular density in nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:2139–43 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3564 pmid:23721898

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Sakai N,
    3. Yamashita S,
    4. Takehara Y, et al

    . Evaluation of the antiangiogenic effects of octreotide on growth hormone-producing pituitary adenoma using arterial spin-labeling perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 2015;14:73–76 doi:10.2463/mrms.2014-0026 pmid:25345412

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Koizumi S,
    3. Sakai N,
    4. Kawaji H, et al

    . Pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling reflects vascular density and differentiates angiomatous meningiomas from non-angiomatous meningiomas. Neurooncol 2015;121:549–56 doi:10.1007/s11060-014-1666-0 pmid:25479828

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Louis DN,
    3. Ohgaki H,
    4. Wiestler OD, et al

    . The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 2007;114:97–109 doi:10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4 pmid:17618441

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Naganuma H,
    3. Satoh E,
    4. Nukui H

    . Technical considerations of transsphenoidal removal of fibrous pituitary adenomas and evaluation of collagen content and subtype in the adenomas. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2002;42:202–12 doi:10.2176/nmc.42.202 pmid:12064154

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Sasaki T,
    3. Shono T,
    4. Hashiguchi K, et al

    . Histological considerations of the cleavage plane for preservation of facial and cochlear nerve functions in vestibular schwannoma surgery. J Neurosurg 2009;110:648–55 doi:10.3171/2008.4.17514 pmid:18928359

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Shinagawa Y,
    3. Mitsufuji T,
    4. Morimoto S, et al

    . Optimization of scanning parameters for MR elastography at 3.0 T clinical unit: volunteer study. Japan J Radiol 2014;32:441–46 doi:10.1007/s11604-014-0320-2 pmid:24771357

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Murphy MC,
    3. Huston J 3rd.,
    4. Jack CR Jr., et al

    . Measuring the characteristic topography of brain stiffness with magnetic resonance elastography. PLoS One 2013;8:e81668 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081668 pmid:24312570

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Dittmann F,
    3. Hirsch S,
    4. Tzschätzsch H, et al

    . In vivo wideband multifrequency MR elastography of the human brain and liver. Magn Reson Med 2015 Oct 20. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1002/mrm.26006 pmid:26485494

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Garteiser P,
    3. Sahebjavaher RS,
    4. Ter Beek LC, et al

    . Rapid acquisition of multifrequency, multislice and multidirectional MR elastography data with a fractionally encoded gradient echo sequence. NMR Biomed 2013;26:1326–35 doi:10.1002/nbm.2958 pmid:23712852

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Rump J,
    3. Klatt D,
    4. Braun J, et al

    . Fractional encoding of harmonic motions in MR elastography. Magn Reson Med 2007;57:388–95 doi:10.1002/mrm.21152 pmid:17260354

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Sack I,
    3. Beierbach B,
    4. Hamhaber U, et al

    . Non-invasive measurement of brain viscoelasticity using magnetic resonance elastography. NMR Biomed 2008;21:265–71 doi:10.1002/nbm.1189 pmid:17614101

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Yin Z,
    3. Kearney SP,
    4. Magin RL, et al

    . Concurrent 3D acquisition of diffusion tensor imaging and magnetic resonance elastography displacement data (DTI-MRE): theory and in vivo application. Magn Reson Med 2016 Jan 20. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1002/mrm.26121 pmid:26787007

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Johnson CL,
    3. Holtrop JL,
    4. McGarry MD, et al

    . 3D multislab, multishot acquisition for fast, whole-brain MR elastography with high signal-to-noise efficiency. Magn Reson Med 2014;71:477–85 doi:10.1002/mrm.25065 pmid:24347237

    CrossRefPubMed