Comparing Preliminary and Final Neuroradiology Reports: What Factors Determine the Differences?

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Babiarz LS,
   3. Yousem DM

   . Quality control in neuroradiology: discrepancies in image interpretation among academic neuroradiologists. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:37–42 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2704 pmid:22033725

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Viertel VG,
   3. Babiarz LS,
   4. Carone M, et al

   . Quality control in neuroradiology: impact of trainees on discrepancy rates. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1032–36 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2933 pmid:22300933

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Diagnostic Radiology. https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/420_diagnostic_radiology_2016.pdf. . Effective July 1, 2016Accessed July 14, 2016.
4. 4.↵
   2. Sharpe RE Jr.,
   3. Surrey D,
   4. Gorniak RJ, et al

   . Radiology report comparator: a novel method to augment resident education. J Digit Imaging 2012;25:330–36 doi:10.1007/s10278-011-9419-5 pmid:21956519

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Surrey D,
   3. Sharpe RE Jr.,
   4. Gorniak RJ, et al

   . QRSE: a novel metric for the evaluation of trainee radiologist reporting skills. J Digit Imaging 2013;26:678–82 doi:10.1007/s10278-013-9574-y pmid:23381098

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   R. The R Project for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed May 20, 2016.
7. 7.↵
   2. Kanal K,
   3. Hangiandreou N,
   4. Sykes A, et al

   . Initial evaluation of a continuous speech recognition program for radiology. J Digit Imaging 2001;14:30–37 doi:10.1007/s10278-001-0022-z pmid:11310913

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Sharpe RE,
   3. Pan K,
   4. Gorniak RJ, et al

   . Tracking reporting metrics over the course of a resident/fellow training period: an automated methodology to evaluate progress in the reporting process. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Society for Imaging Informatics, Dallas, Texas. June 6–9, 2013
9. 9.↵
   2. McGrath JR,
   3. Mitra S,
   4. Nicola R

   . The effect of overnight attending coverage on resident education at a large academic medical center. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association of University Radiologists, Baltimore, Maryland. April 1–4, 2014
10. 10.↵
    2. Friedman SM,
    3. Merman E,
    4. Chopra A

    . Clinical impact of diagnostic imaging discrepancy by radiology trainees in an urban teaching hospital emergency department. Int J Emerg Med 2013;6:24 doi:10.1186/1865-1380-6-24 pmid:23866048

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Ruchman RB,
    3. Jaeger J,
    4. Wiggins EF 3rd., et al

    . Preliminary radiology resident interpretations versus final attending radiologist interpretations and the impact on patient care in a community hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:523–26 doi:10.2214/AJR.07.2307 pmid:17715095

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Weinberg BD,
    3. Richter MD,
    4. Champine JG, et al

    . Radiology resident preliminary reporting in an independent call environment: multiyear assessment of volume, timeliness, and accuracy. J Am Coll Radiol 2015;12:95–100 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2014.08.005 pmid:25557573

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Huntley JH,
    3. Carone M,
    4. Yousem DM, et al

    . Opportunities for targeted education: critical neuroradiologic findings missed or misinterpreted by residents and fellows. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;205:1155–59 doi:10.2214/AJR.15.14905 pmid:26587919

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Surrey D,
    3. Sharpe RE,
    4. Gorniak RJ, et al

    . Variability in the extent of edits made by attending radiologists to trainee radiology reports. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association of University Radiologists, San Antonio, Texas. March 19–22, 2012