Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research Article

Radiation Dose Reduction in 4D Cerebral CT Angiography by Individualized Estimation of Cerebral Circulation Time

M.R. Radon, A. Chandran, M. Bhojak and K.V. Das
American Journal of Neuroradiology December 2016, 37 (12) 2189-2194; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4911
M.R. Radon
aFrom the Department of Neuroradiology, The Walton Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.R. Radon
A. Chandran
aFrom the Department of Neuroradiology, The Walton Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Chandran
M. Bhojak
aFrom the Department of Neuroradiology, The Walton Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Bhojak
K.V. Das
aFrom the Department of Neuroradiology, The Walton Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for K.V. Das
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Schematic representation showing typical time-attenuation curves for arterial (solid line) and venous (dotted line) profiles. The tOA was set to the nearest integer second in which the arterial attenuation crossed 100 HU (14 seconds in this figure, but note that measurements were only made on odd-numbered seconds). The tPA and tPV represent times of peak arterial and venous attenuation, respectively. The gray bar indicates the exposure time for the estimated duration protocol (16 seconds), and the black bar indicates the exposure time for the measured-duration protocol. Subtracted MIP images illustrate typical appearances of the acquisition at key phases.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Boxplot illustrating distribution of peak venous enhancement between the estimated- and measured-duration scan protocols. Two outliers are shown in the estimated-duration group, in which no venous enhancement was present due to inadequate time coverage, and 1 outlier with very poor venous enhancement is shown in the measured-duration group.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Scatterplots indicating exposure duration (A) and the number of nondiagnostic volumes due to the start of the acquisition before contrast arrival (B) and the end of the acquisition following contrast washout (C). Horizontal lines indicate the median.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Demographics and breakdown of indications for imaging

    Estimated Duration (n = 151)Measured Duration (n = 53)
    Demographics
        Age (yr)53.4 (19–87)51.8 (21–79)
        Sex (M/F)67:8425:28
    Indications (No.) (%)
        Intraparenchymal hemorrhage47 (31%)20 (38%)
        Suspected vascular lesion37 (25%)11 (21%)
        Tinnitus21 (14%)5 (9%)
        Tumor vascular assessment11 (7%)5 (9%)
        Subdural hemorrhage5 (3%)0 (0%)
        Subarachnoid hemorrhage4 (3%)0 (0%)
        Untreated AVM/F assessment7 (5%)5 (9%)
        Treated AVM/F assessment6 (4%)3 (6%)
        Venous stenosis/thrombosis (including assessment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension)8 (5%)3 (6%)
        Other5 (3%)1 (2%)
    • Note:—AVM/F indicates arteriovenous malformation or fistula.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Diagnostic performance of original and measured-duration protocolsa

    Estimated Duration (n = 151)Measured Duration (n = 53)P ValueAdjusted P Value
    Exposure and dose
        Exposure time (sec)15.75 (8.25–25.5)10.0 (8–12)<.001<.001b
        No. of volumes31 (26–36)19 (19–19)
        Dose-length product (mGy × cm)3021 (2536–3502)1473 (1459–1526)
        Volume CT dose index (mGy)185 (162–223)88.9 (88.9–88.9)
        Effective dose (mSv)6.9 (5.8–8.0)3.4 (3.4–3.5)
    Study quality
        Maximum venous enhancement (HU)372 (352–392)324 (294–353).019.076
        Adequate time coverage (No.)134 (88.7%)49 (92.5%).4441.00
        Quality score5 (5–5)5 (5–5).8371.00
        No. of prearterial volumes6 (4–10)0 (0–1)<.001c<.001b,c
        No. of postpeak venous volumes2 (0–6)0 (0–2)<.001c<.001b,c
    Diagnostic performance
        Positive findings (No.)58 (38.4%)21 (39.6%)
        No. having DSA56 (37.1%)22 (41.5%)
        Intermodality concordance between 4D-CTA and DSA (No.)51 (91.0%)22 (100.0%)
            Cohen κ statisticκ = 0.88κ = 1.0
    • ↵a Noncount values are shown as median (interquartile range), except for exposure time shown as median (range) and enhancement shown as mean (95% CI). Values for dose-length product include the entire examination, including test-bolus acquisition. CT dose index values include only whole-head acquisitions.

    • ↵b Significant at the 5% level after Bonferroni correction.

    • ↵c Post hoc test.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Comparison of the currently reported techniques with 4D-CTA techniques (excluding combined 4D-CTA/CTP techniques) reported by other groups

    ReportExposure Duration (sec)Rotation Time (ms)Exposure ParametersEffective Dose (mSv)
    Brouwer et al (2010)222NS80 kV, 120 mA5.1
    Hoogenboom et al (2012)111550080 kV, 240 mANS
    Fujiwara et al (2013)312a50080 kV, 200 mA5.2
    Willems et al (2011)1 and (2012)522100080 kV, 100 mA5.2
    D'Orazio et al (2014)101535080 kV, 120 mA5.62
    This study
        Estimated duration15.6 (16 with option to adjust)75080 kV, 150 mA6.9
        Measured exposure10.1 (mean)100080 kV, 100 mA3.4
    • Note:—NS indicates not stated.

    • ↵a Ten-second continuous exposure followed by 4 intermittent exposures.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 37 (12)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 37, Issue 12
1 Dec 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Radiation Dose Reduction in 4D Cerebral CT Angiography by Individualized Estimation of Cerebral Circulation Time
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
M.R. Radon, A. Chandran, M. Bhojak, K.V. Das
Radiation Dose Reduction in 4D Cerebral CT Angiography by Individualized Estimation of Cerebral Circulation Time
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2016, 37 (12) 2189-2194; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4911

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Radiation Dose Reduction in 4D Cerebral CT Angiography by Individualized Estimation of Cerebral Circulation Time
M.R. Radon, A. Chandran, M. Bhojak, K.V. Das
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2016, 37 (12) 2189-2194; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4911
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • 4D-DSA for Assessment of the Angioarchitecture and Grading of Cranial Dural AVF
  • 4D Flat Panel Conebeam CTA for In Vivo Imaging of the Microvasculature of the Human Cortex with a Novel Software Prototype
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire