Comparison of Quantitative Cerebral Blood Flow Measurements Performed by Bookend Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast and Arterial Spin-Labeling MRI in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Goldenberg MM

   . Multiple sclerosis review. P T 2012;37:175–84 pmid:22605909

   PubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Rao SM,
   3. Leo GJ,
   4. Bernardin L, et al

   . Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis, I: frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology 1991;41:685–91 doi:10.1212/WNL.41.5.685 pmid:2027484

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Sun X,
   3. Tanaka M,
   4. Kondo S, et al

   . Clinical significance of reduced cerebral metabolism in multiple sclerosis: a combined PET and MRI study. Ann Nucl Med 1998;12:89–94 doi:10.1007/BF03164835 pmid:9637279

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Swank RL,
   3. Roth JG,
   4. Woody DC Jr.

   . Cerebral blood flow and red cell delivery in normal subjects and in multiple sclerosis. Neurol Res 1983;5:37–59 doi:10.1080/01616412.1983.11739631 pmid:6140655

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Lycke J,
   3. Wikkelsö C,
   4. Bergh AC, et al

   . Regional cerebral blood flow in multiple sclerosis measured by single photon emission tomography with technetium-99m hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime. Eur Neurol 1993;33:163–67 pmid:8467826

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Brooks DJ,
   3. Leenders KL,
   4. Head G, et al

   . Studies on regional cerebral oxygen utilisation and cognitive function in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984;47:1182–91 doi:10.1136/jnnp.47.11.1182 pmid:6334132

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. D'Haeseleer M,
   3. Cambron M,
   4. Vanopdenbosch L, et al

   . Vascular aspects of multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2011;10:657–66 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70105-3 pmid:21683931

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. De Keyser J,
   3. Steen C,
   4. Mostert JP, et al

   . Hypoperfusion of the cerebral white matter in multiple sclerosis: possible mechanisms and pathophysiological significance. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2008;28:1645–51 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2008.72 pmid:18594554

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Debernard L,
   3. Melzer TR,
   4. Van Stockum S, et al

   . Reduced grey matter perfusion without volume loss in early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014;85:544–51 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2013-305612 pmid:24039024

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Hojjat SP,
    3. Cantrell CG,
    4. Vitorino R, et al

    . Regional reduction in cortical blood flow among cognitively impaired adults with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler 2016 Jan 11. [Epub ahead of print] pmid:26754799
11. 11.↵
    2. Hojjat S,
    3. Cantrell C,
    4. Carroll T, et al

    . Perfusion reduction in the absence of structural differences in cognitively impaired versus unimpaired RRMS patients. Mult Scler 2016 Feb 4. [Epub ahead of print] pmid:26846987

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Aviv RI,
    3. Francis PL,
    4. Tenenbein R, et al

    . Decreased frontal lobe gray matter perfusion in cognitively impaired patients with secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis detected by the bookend technique. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1779–85 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3060 pmid:22538071

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Francis PL,
    3. Jakubovic R,
    4. O'Connor P, et al

    . Robust perfusion deficits in cognitively impaired patients with secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:62–67 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3148 pmid:22700746

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Inglese M,
    3. Adhya S,
    4. Johnson G, et al

    . Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging correlates of neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2008;28:164–71 doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600504 pmid:17473851

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Shin W,
    3. Cashen TA,
    4. Horowitz SW, et al

    . Quantitative CBV measurement from static T1 changes in tissue and correction for intravascular water exchange. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:138–45 doi:10.1002/mrm.20937 pmid:16767742

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Shin W,
    3. Horowitz S,
    4. Ragin A, et al

    . Quantitative cerebral perfusion using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: evaluation of reproducibility and age- and gender-dependence with fully automatic image postprocessing algorithm. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:1232–41 doi:10.1002/mrm.21420 pmid:17969025

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Carroll TJ,
    3. Horowitz S,
    4. Shin W, et al

    . Quantification of cerebral perfusion using the “bookend technique”: an evaluation in CNS tumors. Magn Reson Imaging 2008;26:1352–59 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2008.04.010 pmid:18538523

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Petersen ET,
    3. Zimine I,
    4. Ho YC, et al

    . Non-invasive measurement of perfusion: a critical review of arterial spin labelling techniques. Br J Radiol 2006;79:688–701 doi:10.1259/bjr/67705974 pmid:16861326

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Detre JA,
    3. Wang J,
    4. Wang Z, et al

    . Arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI in basic and clinical neuroscience. Corr Opin Neurol 2009;22:348–55 doi:10.1097/WCO.0b013e32832d9505 pmid:19491678

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Detre JA,
    3. Leigh JS,
    4. Williams DS, et al

    . Perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 1992;23:37–45 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910230106

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Chen Y,
    3. Wang DJ,
    4. Detre JA

    . Test-retest reliability of arterial spin labeling with common labeling strategies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;33:940–49 doi:10.1002/jmri.22345 pmid:21448961

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Wu WC,
    3. Jiang SF,
    4. Yang SC, et al

    . Pseudocontinuous arterial spin-labeling perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a normative study of reproducibility in the human brain. Neuroimage 2011;56:1244–50 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.080 pmid:21385620

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Jain V,
    3. Duda J,
    4. Avants B, et al

    . Longitudinal reproducibility and accuracy of pseudo-continuous arterial spin-labeled perfusion MR imaging in typically developing children. Radiology 2012;263:527–36 doi:10.1148/radiol.12111509 pmid:22517961

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Adams CW,
    3. Poston RN,
    4. Buk SJ, et al

    . Inflammatory vasculitis in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 1985;69:269–83 doi:10.1016/0022-510X(85)90139-X pmid:4031947

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Nasreddine ZS,
    3. Phillips NA,
    4. Bédirian V, et al

    . The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:695–99 doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x pmid:15817019

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Benedict RH,
    3. Fischer JS,
    4. Archibald CJ, et al

    . Minimal neuropsychological assessment of MS patients: a consensus approach. Clin Neuropsychol 2002;16:381–97 doi:10.1076/clin.16.3.381.13859 pmid:12607150

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Shirzadi Z,
    3. Crane DE,
    4. Robertson AD, et al

    . Automated removal of spurious intermediate cerebral blood flow volumes improves image quality among older patients: a clinical arterial spin labeling investigation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;42:1377–85 doi:10.1002/jmri.24918 pmid:25873287

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Alsop DC,
    3. Detre JA,
    4. Golay X, et al

    . Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: a consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med 2015;73:102–16 doi:10.1002/mrm.25197 pmid:24715426

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Vakil P,
    3. Lee JJ,
    4. Mouannes-Srour JJ, et al

    . Cerebrovascular occlusive disease: quantitative cerebral blood flow using dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging correlates with quantitative H2[15O] PET. Radiology 2013;266:879–86 doi:10.1148/radiol.12120756 pmid:23297337

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Srour JM,
    3. Shin W,
    4. Shah S, et al

    . SCALE-PWI: a pulse sequence for absolute quantitative cerebral perfusion imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2011;31:1272–82 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2010.215 pmid:21157469

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Brady M,
    4. Smith S

    . Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20:45–57 doi:10.1109/42.906424 pmid:11293691

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    2. Cha YH,
    3. Jog MA,
    4. Kim YC, et al

    . Regional correlation between resting state FDG PET and pCASL perfusion MRI. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2013;33:1909–14 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2013.147 pmid:23963370

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    2. Bland JM,
    3. Altman DG

    . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–10 pmid:2868172

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    2. Constantinides CD,
    3. Atalar E,
    4. McVeigh ER

    . Signal-to-noise measurements in magnitude images from NMR phased arrays. Magnetic Reson Med 1997;38:852–57 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910380524 pmid:9358462

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Amato MP,
    3. Zipoli V,
    4. Portaccio E

    . Multiple sclerosis-related cognitive changes: a review of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. J Neurol Sci 2006;245:41–46 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2005.08.019 pmid:16643953

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    2. Roosendaal SD,
    3. Moraal B,
    4. Pouwels PJ, et al

    . Accumulation of cortical lesions in MS: relation with cognitive impairment. Mult Scler 2009;15:708–14 doi:10.1177/1352458509102907 pmid:19435749

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    2. van Gelderen P,
    3. de Zwart JA,
    4. Duyn JH

    . Pittfalls of MRI measurement of white matter perfusion based on arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 2008;59:788–95 doi:10.1002/mrm.21515 pmid:18383289

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    2. van Osch MJ,
    3. Teeuwisse WM,
    4. van Walderveen MA, et al

    . Can arterial spin labeling detect white matter perfusion signal? Magn Reson Med 2009;62:165–73 doi:10.1002/mrm.22002 pmid:19365865

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    2. Hojjat SP,
    3. Kincal M,
    4. Vitorino R, et al

    . Cortical perfusion alteration in normal-appearing gray matter is most sensitive to disease progression in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016 Mar 24. [Epub ahead of print] pmid:27012299
40. 40.↵
    2. Chalela JA,
    3. Alsop DC,
    4. Gonzalez-Atavales JB, et al

    . Magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in acute ischemic stroke using continuous arterial spin labeling. Stroke 2000;31:680–87 doi:10.1161/01.STR.31.3.680 pmid:10700504

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
41. 41.↵
    2. Zhang K,
    3. Herzog H,
    4. Mauler J, et al

    . Comparison of cerebral blood flow acquired by simultaneous [15O]water positron emission tomography and arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2014;34:1373–80 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2014.92 pmid:24849665

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
42. 42.↵
    2. Lindgren E,
    3. Wirestam R,
    4. Markenroth Bloch K, et al

    . Absolute quantification of perfusion by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI using bookend and VASO steady-state CBV calibration: a comparison with pseudo-continuous ASL. MAGMA 2014;27:487–99 doi:10.1007/s10334-014-0431-x pmid:24570336

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    2. Mutsaerts HJ,
    3. van Osch MJ,
    4. Zelaya FO, et al

    . Multi-vendor reliability of arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI using a near-identical sequence: implications for multi-center studies. Neuroimage 2015;113:143–52 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.043 pmid:25818685

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    2. Carroll TJ,
    3. Teneggi V,
    4. Jobin M, et al

    . Absolute quantification of cerebral blood flow with magnetic resonance, reproducibility of the method, and comparison with H2(15)O positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2002;22:1149–56 pmid:12218421

    Abstract/FREE Full Text