Does Arterial Flow Rate Affect the Assessment of Flow-Diverter Stent Performance?

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Durso PI,
   3. Lanzino G,
   4. Cloft HJ, et al

   . Flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms: a review. Stroke 2011;42:2363–68 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.620328 pmid:21737793

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Pierot L

   . flow diverter stents in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: where are we? J Neuroradiol 2011;38:40–46 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2010.12.002 pmid:21257202

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Byrne JV,
   3. Beltechi R,
   4. Yarnold JA, et al

   . Early experience in the treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: a multicentre prospective study. PLoS One 2010;5:1–8 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012492 pmid:20824070

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Szikora I,
   3. Berentei Z,
   4. Kulcsar Z, et al

   . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1139–47 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2023 pmid:20150304

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Lylyk P,
   3. Miranda C,
   4. Ceratto R, et al

   . Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 2009;64:632–42; discussion 642–43; quiz N6 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000339109.98070.65 pmid:19349825

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Grunwald IQ,
   3. Kamran M,
   4. Corkill RA, et al

   . Simple measurement of aneurysm residual after treatment: the SMART scale for evaluation of intracranial aneurysms treated with flow diverters. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012;154:21–26; discussion 26 doi:10.1007/s00701-011-1177-0 pmid:22002552

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Ionita CN,
   3. Paciorek AM,
   4. Dohatcu A, et al

   . The asymmetric vascular stent efficacy in a rabbit aneurysm model. Stroke 2009;40:959–65 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.524124 pmid:19131663

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Benz T,
   3. Kowarschik M,
   4. Endres J, et al

   . A Fourier-based approach to the angiographic assessment of flow diverter efficacy in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2014;33:1788–802 doi:10.1109/TMI.2014.2320602 pmid:24801649

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Mut F,
   3. Ruijters D,
   4. Babic D, et al

   . Effects of changing physiologic conditions on the in vivo quantification of hemodynamic variables in cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverting devices. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 2014;30:135–42 doi:10.1002/cnm.2594 pmid:24039143

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Morales HG,
    3. Bonnefous O

    . Peak systolic or maximum intra-aneurysmal hemodynamic condition? Implications on normalized flow variables. J Biomech 2014;47:2362–70 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.04.025 pmid:24861633

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Morales HG,
    3. Bonnefous O

    . Modeling hemodynamics after flow diverter with a porous medium. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, Beijing, China. April 29 to May 2, 2014
12. 12.↵
    2. Morales HG,
    3. Bonnefous O

    . Unraveling the relationship between arterial flow and intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics. J Biomech 2015;48:585–91 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.01.016 pmid:25638035

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Morales HG,
    3. Larrabide I,
    4. Geers AJ, et al

    . Newtonian and non-Newtonian blood flow in coiled cerebral aneurysms. J Biomech 2013;46:2158–64 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.06.034 pmid:23891312

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Bonnefous O,
    3. Pereira VM,
    4. Ouared R, et al

    . Quantification of arterial flow using digital subtraction angiography. Med Phys 2012;39:6264–75 doi:10.1118/1.4754299 pmid:23039662

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Pereira VM,
    3. Bonnefous O,
    4. Ouared R, et al

    . A DSA-based method using contrast-motion estimation for the assessment of the intra-aneurysmal flow changes induced by flow diverter stents. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:808–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3322 pmid:23124641

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Pereira VM,
    3. Ouared R,
    4. Brina O, et al

    . Quantification of internal carotid artery flow with digital subtraction angiography: validation of an optical flow approach with Doppler ultrasound. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:156–63 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3662 pmid:23928145

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Ford MD,
    3. Alperin N,
    4. Lee SH, et al

    . Characterization of volumetric flow rate waveforms in the normal internal carotid and vertebral arteries. Physiol Meas 2005;26:477–88 doi:10.1088/0967-3334/26/4/013 pmid:15886442

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Hoi Y,
    3. Wasserman BA,
    4. Xie YJ, et al

    . Characterization of volumetric flow rate waveforms at the carotid bifurcations of older adults. Physiol Meas 2010;31:291–302 doi:10.1088/0967-3334/31/3/002 pmid:20086276

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Castro MA,
    4. Putman CM, et al

    . Flow-area relationship in internal carotid and vertebral arteries. Physiol Meas 2008;29:585–94 doi:10.1088/0967-3334/29/5/005 pmid:18460763

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Fernández MA,
    3. Gerbeau J,
    4. Martin V

    . Numerical simulation of blood flows through a porous interface. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis 2008;42:961–90 doi:10.1051/m2an:2008031

    CrossRef
21. 21.↵
    2. Augsburger L,
    3. Reymond P,
    4. Rufenacht DA, et al

    . Intracranial stents being modeled as a porous medium: flow simulation in stented cerebral aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng 2011;39:850–63 doi:10.1007/s10439-010-0200-6 pmid:21042856

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Chong W,
    4. Qian Y

    . Investigation of intracranial aneurysm hemodynamics following flow diverter stent treatment. Med Eng Phys 2013;35:608–15 doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.07.005 pmid:22884174

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Levitt MR,
    3. McGah PM,
    4. Aliseda A, et al

    . Cerebral aneurysms treated with flow-diverting stents: computational models with intravascular blood flow measurements. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:143–48 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3624 pmid:23868162

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Geers AJ,
    3. Larrabide I,
    4. Morales HG, et al

    . Approximating hemodynamics of cerebral aneurysms with steady flow simulations. J Biomech 2014;47:178–85 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.09.033 pmid:24262847

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Kim M,
    3. Taulbee DB,
    4. Tremmel M, et al

    . Comparison of two stents in modifying cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics. Ann Biomed Eng 2008;36:726–41 doi:10.1007/s10439-008-9449-4 pmid:18264766

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Larrabide I,
    3. Geers AJ,
    4. Morales HG, et al

    . Change in aneurysmal flow pulsatility after flow diverter treatment. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2016;50:2–8 doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2015.01.008 pmid:25704859

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Peach TW,
    3. Ngoepe M,
    4. Spranger K, et al

    . Personalizing flow diverter intervention for cerebral aneurysms: from computational hemodynamics to biochemical modeling. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 2014;30:1387–407 doi:10.1002/cnm.2663 pmid:25045060

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Dempere-Marco L,
    3. Oubel E,
    4. Castro MA, et al

    . CFD analysis incorporating the influence of wall motion: application to intracranial aneurysms. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2006;9(pt 2):438–45 pmid:17354802

    PubMed