Radiation Doses in Patient Eye Lenses during Interventional Neuroradiology Procedures

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Stewart FA,
   3. Akleyev AV,
   4. Hauer-Jensen M, et al

   ; ICRP. ICRP Publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions/early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs: threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP 2012;41:1–322 doi:10.1016/j.icrp.2012.02.001 pmid:22925378

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007;37:1–332 doi:10.1016/j.icrp.2007.11.001 pmid:180882557

   FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Nakashima E,
   3. Neriishi K,
   4. Minamoto A

   . A reanalysis of atomic-bomb cataract data, 2000–2002: a threshold analysis. Health Phys 2006;90:154–60 doi:10.1097/01.HP.0000175442.03596.63 pmid:16404173

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Neriishi K,
   3. Nakashima E,
   4. Minamoto A, et al

   . Postoperative cataract cases among atomic bomb survivors: radiation dose response and threshold. Radiat Res 2007;168:404–08 doi:10.1667/RR0928.1 pmid:17903036

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources. International basic safety standards: IAEA Safety Standards Series. GSR part 3. Vienna IAEA, July 21, 2014. http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1578_web-57265295.pdf. Accessed October 2, 2015.
6. 6.↵
   Council Directive 2013/59/EURATOM of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation. Official journal of the European Union 17.1.2014, L13, chapter VIIAccessed October 2, 2015 pp. 25–28. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32013L0059&from=EN. Accessed October 2, 2015.
7. 7.↵
   2. Moritake T,
   3. Matsumaru Y,
   4. Takigawa T, et al

   . Dose measurement on both patients and operators during neurointerventional procedures using photoluminiscence glass dosimeters. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1910–17 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1235 pmid:18719037

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Sandborg M,
   3. Rossitti S,
   4. Pettersson H

   . Local skin and eye lens equivalent doses in interventional neuroradiology. Eur Radiol 2010;20:725–33 doi:10.1007/s00330-009-1598-9 pmid:19727739

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Spetzler R,
   3. Martin N

   . A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations: 1986. J Neurosurg 2008;108:186–93 doi:10.3171/JNS/2008/108/01/0186 pmid:18173333

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Al-Senan RM,
    3. Hatab MR

    . Characteristics of an OSLD in the diagnostic energy range. Med Phys 2011;38:4396 doi:10.1118/1.3602456 pmid:21859040

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Jursinic PA

    . Characterization of optically stimulated luminescents, OSLDs, for clinical dosimetric measurements. Med Phys 2007;34:4594–604 doi:10.1118/1.2804555 pmid:18196786

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Yukihara EG,
    3. McKeever SW

    . Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimetry in medicine. Phys Med Biol 2008;53:R351–79 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/53/20/R01 pmid:18799833

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. ICRU report 74: patient dosimetry for x rays used in medical imaging. J ICRU 2005;5(2, theme issue):29
14. 14.↵
    International Electrotechnical Commission. Medical electrical equipment. Part 2–43: particular requirements for the safety of x-ray equipment for interventional procedures. Report IEC 60601-2-43. Geneva, Switzerland: International Electrotechnical Commission; 2010:25–26
15. 15.↵
    2. Koyama S,
    3. Aoyama T,
    4. Oda N, et al

    . Radiation dose evaluation in tomosynthesis and C-arm cone-beam CT examinations with an anthropomorphic phantom. Med Phys 2010;37:4298–306 doi:10.1118/1.3465045 pmid:20879590

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. D'Ercole L,
    3. Thyrion FZ,
    4. Bocchiola M, et al

    . Proposed local diagnostic reference levels in angiography and interventional neuroradiology and a preliminary analysis according to the complexity of the procedures. Phys Med 2012;28:61–70 doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2010.10.008 pmid:21074469

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Miller DL,
    3. Kwon D,
    4. Bonavia GH

    . Reference levels for patient radiation doses in interventional radiology: proposed initial values for U.S. practice. Radiology 2009;253:753–64 doi:10.1148/radiol.2533090354 pmid:19789226

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Verdun FR,
    3. Aroua A,
    4. Trueb R, et al

    . Diagnostic and interventional radiology: a strategy to introduce reference dose level taking into account the national practice. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005;114:188–91 doi:10.1093/rpd/nch547 pmid:15933106

    Abstract/FREE Full Text