Automated Hippocampal Subfield Segmentation at 7T MRI

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Small SA,
   3. Schobel SA,
   4. Buxton RB, et al

   . A pathophysiological framework of hippocampal dysfunction in ageing and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 2011;12:585–601 doi:10.1038/nrn3085 pmid:21897434

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Yushkevich PA,
   3. Amaral RS,
   4. Augustinack JC, et al

   ; Hippocampal Subfields Group (HSG). Quantitative comparison of 21 protocols for labeling hippocampal subfields and parahippocampal subregions in in vivo MRI: towards a harmonized segmentation protocol. Neuroimage 2015;111:526–41 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.004 pmid:25596463

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Mueller SG,
   3. Stables L,
   4. Du AT, et al

   . Measurement of hippocampal subfields and age-related changes with high resolution MRI at 4T. Neurobiol Aging 2007;28:719–26 doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.03.007 pmid:16713659

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Malykhin NV,
   3. Lebel RM,
   4. Coupland NJ, et al

   . In vivo quantification of hippocampal subfields using 4.7T fast spin echo imaging. Neuroimage 2010;49:1224–30 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.042 pmid:19786104

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Wisse LE,
   3. Gerritsen L,
   4. Zwanenburg JJ, et al

   . Subfields of the hippocampal formation at 7T MRI: in vivo volumetric assessment. Neuroimage 2012;61:1043–49 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.023 pmid:22440643

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. La Joie R,
   3. Fouquet M,
   4. Mézenge F, et al

   . Differential effect of age on hippocampal subfields assessed using a new high-resolution 3T MR sequence. Neuroimage 2010;53:506–14 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.024 pmid:20600996

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Kerchner GA,
   3. Hess CP,
   4. Hammond-Rosenbluth KE, et al

   . Hippocampal CA1 apical neuropil atrophy in mild Alzheimer disease visualized with 7-T MRI. Neurology 2010;75:1381–87 doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181f736a1 pmid:20938031

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Raz N,
   3. Daugherty AM,
   4. Bender AR, et al

   . Volume of the hippocampal subfields in healthy adults: differential associations with age and a pro-inflammatory genetic variant. Brain Struct Funct 2015;220:2663–74 doi:10.1007/s00429-014-0817-6 pmid:24947882

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Winterburn JL,
   3. Pruessner JC,
   4. Chavez S, et al

   . A novel in vivo atlas of human hippocampal subfields using high-resolution 3 T magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 2013;74:254–65 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.003 pmid:23415948

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Van Leemput K,
    3. Bakkour A,
    4. Benner T, et al

    . Automated segmentation of hippocampal subfields from ultra-high resolution in vivo MRI. Hippocampus 2009;19:549–57 doi:10.1002/hipo.20615 pmid:19405131

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Pipitone J,
    3. Park MT,
    4. Winterburn J, et al

    ; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Multi-atlas segmentation of the whole hippocampus and subfields using multiple automatically generated templates. Neuroimage 2014;101:494–512 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.054 pmid:24784800

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Yushkevich PA,
    3. Pluta JB,
    4. Wang H, et al

    . Automated volumetry and regional thickness analysis of hippocampal subfields and medial temporal cortical structures in mild cognitive impairment. Hum Brain Mapp 2015;36:258–87 doi:10.1002/hbm.22627 pmid:25181316

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Iglesias JE,
    3. Augustinack JC,
    4. Nguyen K, et al

    ; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. A computational atlas of the hippocampal formation using ex vivo, ultra-high resolution MRI: application to adaptive segmentation of in vivo MRI. Neuroimage 2015;115:117–37 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.042 pmid:25936807

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Cho ZH,
    3. Han JY,
    4. Hwang SI, et al

    . Quantitative analysis of the hippocampus using images obtained from 7.0 T MRI. Neuroimage 2010;49:2134–40 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.002 pmid:19909820

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Thomas BP,
    3. Welch EB,
    4. Niederhauser BD, et al

    . High-resolution 7T MRI of the human hippocampus in vivo. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:1266–72 doi:10.1002/jmri.21576 pmid:18972336

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Wisse LE,
    3. Biessels GJ,
    4. Heringa SM, et al

    ; Utrecht Vascular Cognitive Impairment (VCI) Study Group. Hippocampal subfield volumes at 7T in early Alzheimer's disease and normal aging. Neurobiol Aging 2014;35:2039–45 doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.02.021 pmid:24684788

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Boutet C,
    3. Chupin M,
    4. Lehéricy S, et al

    . Detection of volume loss in hippocampal layers in Alzheimer's disease using 7T MRI: a feasibility study. Neuroimage Clin 2014;5:341–48 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2014.07.011 pmid:25161900

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Kerchner GA,
    3. Deutsch GK,
    4. Zeineh M, et al

    . Hippocampal CA1 apical neuropil atrophy and memory performance in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage 2012;63:194–202 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.048 pmid:22766164

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Yushkevich PA,
    3. Wang H,
    4. Pluta J, et al

    . Nearly automatic segmentation of hippocampal subfields in in vivo focal T2-weighted MRI. Neuroimage 2010;53:1208–24 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.040 pmid:20600984

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Stegenga BT,
    3. Kamphuis MH,
    4. King M, et al

    . The natural course and outcome of major depressive disorder in primary care: the PREDICT-NL study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2012;47:87–95 doi:10.1007/s00127-010-0317-9 pmid:21057769

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Folstein MF,
    3. Folstein SE,
    4. McHugh PR

    . “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–98 doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 pmid:1202204

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Kuijf HJ

    . Image Processing Techniques for Quantification and Assessment of Brain MRI [dissertation]. Utrecht: Utrecht University Repository; 2013
23. 23.↵
    2. Ritter F,
    3. Boskamp T,
    4. Homeyer A, et al

    . Medical image analysis. IEEE Pulse 2011;2:60–70 doi:10.1109/MPUL.2011.942929 pmid:22147070

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Goncharova II,
    3. Dickerson BC,
    4. Stoub TR, et al

    . MRI of human entorhinal cortex: a reliable protocol for volumetric measurement. Neurobiol Aging 2001;22:737–45 doi:10.1016/S0197-4580(01)00270-6 pmid:11705633

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Insausti R,
    3. Juottonen K,
    4. Soininen H, et al

    . MR volumetric analysis of the human entorhinal, perirhinal, and temporopolar cortices. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:659–71 pmid:9576651

    Abstract
26. 26.↵
    2. Avants BB,
    3. Epstein CL,
    4. Grossman M, et al

    . Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain. Med Image Anal 2008;12:26–41 doi:10.1016/j.media.2007.06.004 pmid:17659998

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Wang H,
    3. Suh JW,
    4. Das SR, et al

    . Multi-atlas segmentation with joint label fusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2013;35:611–23 doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2012.143 pmid:22732662

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Wang H,
    3. Das SR,
    4. Suh JW, et al

    ; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. A learning-based wrapper method to correct systematic errors in automatic image segmentation: consistently improved performance in hippocampus, cortex and brain segmentation. Neuroimage 2011;55:968–85 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.006 pmid:21237273

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Dice LR

    . Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 1945;26:297–302 doi:10.2307/1932409

    CrossRefWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. Crum WR,
    3. Camara O,
    4. Hill DL

    . Generalized overlap measures for evaluation and validation in medical image analysis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006;25:1451–61 doi:10.1109/TMI.2006.880587 pmid:17117774

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    2. Kerchner GA,
    3. Boxer AL

    . Bapineuzumab. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2010;10:1121–30 doi:10.1517/14712598.2010.493872 pmid:20497044

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    2. Wang H,
    3. Yushkevich PA

    . Spatial bias in multi-atlas based segmentation. Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit Workshops 2012;2012:909–16 pmid:23476901

    PubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Flores GS,
    3. de Haan G,
    4. Jasinschi R, et al

    . Automatic Segmentation of Hippocampal Substructures [master's thesis]. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven; 2012
34. 34.↵
    2. de Flores R,
    3. La Joie R,
    4. Landeau B, et al

    . Effects of age and Alzheimer's disease on hippocampal subfields: comparison between manual and FreeSurfer volumetry. Hum Brain Mapp 2015;36:463–74 doi:10.1002/hbm.22640 pmid:25231681

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Wisse LE,
    3. Biessels GJ,
    4. Geerlings MI

    . A critical appraisal of the hippocampal subfield segmentation package in FreeSurfer. Front Aging Neurosci 2014;6:261 doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00261 pmid:25309437

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Desikan RS,
    3. Ségonne F,
    4. Fischl B, et al

    . An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage 2006;31:968–80 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 pmid:16530430

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    2. Klein A,
    3. Tourville J

    . 101 labeled brain images and a consistent human cortical labeling protocol. Front Neurosci 2012;6:171 doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00171 pmid:23227001

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    2. Pluta J,
    3. Yushkevich P,
    4. Das S, et al

    . In vivo analysis of hippocampal subfield atrophy in mild cognitive impairment via semi-automatic segmentation of T2-weighted MRI. J Alzheimers Dis 2012;31:85–99 doi:10.3233/JAD-2012-111931 pmid:22504319

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    2. Mueller S,
    3. Yushkevich P,
    4. Wang L, et al

    . Collaboration for a systematic comparison of different techniques to measure subfield volumes: announcement and first results. Alzheimer's & Dementia 2013;9:P51