Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

  • Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
  • Getting new auth cookie, if you see this message a lot, tell someone!
Research ArticleNeurointervention

Endovascular Treatment versus Best Medical Treatment in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

A.I. Qureshi, M.F. Ishfaq, H.A. Rahman and A.P. Thomas
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2016, 37 (6) 1068-1073; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4775
A.I. Qureshi
aFrom the Zeenat Qureshi Stroke Institute (A.I.Q., M.F.I.), St. Cloud, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A.I. Qureshi
M.F. Ishfaq
aFrom the Zeenat Qureshi Stroke Institute (A.I.Q., M.F.I.), St. Cloud, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.F. Ishfaq
H.A. Rahman
bDepartment of Neurology (H.A.R., A.P.T.), Houston Methodist Hospital–Texas Medical Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for H.A. Rahman
A.P. Thomas
bDepartment of Neurology (H.A.R., A.P.T.), Houston Methodist Hospital–Texas Medical Center, Houston, Texas.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A.P. Thomas
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Hassan AE,
    2. Chaudhry SA,
    3. Grigoryan M, et al
    . National trends in utilization and outcomes of endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke patients in the mechanical thrombectomy era. Stroke 2012;43:3012–17 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.658781 pmid:22968467
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Alberts MJ,
    2. Latchaw RE,
    3. Selman WR, et al
    ; Brain Attack Coalition. Recommendations for comprehensive stroke centers: a consensus statement from the Brain Attack Coalition. Stroke 2005;36:1597–616 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000170622.07210.b4 pmid:15961715
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Grigoryan M,
    2. Chaudhry SA,
    3. Hassan AE, et al
    . Neurointerventional procedural volume per hospital in United States: implications for comprehensive stroke center designation. Stroke 2012;43:1309–14 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.636076 pmid:22382160
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Qureshi AI,
    2. Abd-Allah F,
    3. Aleu A, et al
    . Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke patients: implications and interpretation of IMS III, MR RESCUE, and SYNTHESIS EXPANSION trials—a report from the Working Group of International Congress of Interventional Neurology. J Vasc Interv Neurol 2014;7:56–75 pmid:24920991
    PubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Patil CG,
    2. Long EF,
    3. Lansberg MG
    . Cost-effectiveness analysis of mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurosurg 2009;110:508–13 doi:10.3171/2008.8.JNS08133 pmid:19025358
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Chimowitz MI
    . Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke–still unproven. N Engl J Med 2013;368:952–55 doi:10.1056/NEJMe1215730 pmid:23394477
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Blackham KA,
    2. Meyers PM,
    3. Abruzzo TA, et al
    ; Society for NeuroInterventional Surgery. Endovascular therapy of acute ischemic stroke: report of the Standards of Practice Committee of the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery. J Neurointerv Surg 2012;4:87–93 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010243 pmid:22278933
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Quinn TJ,
    2. Dawson J,
    3. Walters MR, et al
    . Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale: a systematic review. Stroke 2009;40:3393–95 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.557256 pmid:19679846
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. DerSimonian R,
    2. Laird N
    . Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177–88 doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 pmid:3802833
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Cavender MA,
    2. Sabatine MS
    . Bivalirudin versus heparin in patients planned for percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lancet 2014;384:599–606 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61216-2 pmid:25131979
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Jovin TG,
    2. Chamorro A,
    3. Cobo E, et al
    ; REVASCAT Trial Investigators. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2296–306 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1503780 pmid:25882510
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Saver JL,
    2. Goyal M,
    3. Bonafe A, et al
    ; SWIFT PRIME Investigators. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2285–95 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1415061 pmid:25882376
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Goyal M,
    2. Demchuk AM,
    3. Menon BK, et al
    ; ESCAPE Trial Investigators. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1019–30 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414905 pmid:25671798
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Berkhemer OA,
    2. Fransen PS,
    3. Beumer D, et al
    . A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:11–20 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1411587 pmid:25517348
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Campbell BC,
    2. Mitchell PJ,
    3. Kleinig TJ, et al
    ; EXTEND-IA Investigators. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1009–18 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414792 pmid:25671797
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kidwell CS,
    2. Jahan R,
    3. Gornbein J, et al
    ; MR RESCUE Investigators. A trial of imaging selection and endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:914–23 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1212793 pmid:23394476
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Ciccone A,
    2. Valvassori L,
    3. Nichelatti M, et al
    ; SYNTHESIS Expansion Investigators. Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:904–13 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1213701 pmid:23387822
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Broderick JP,
    2. Palesch YY,
    3. Demchuk AM, et al
    ; Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III Investigators. Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:893–903 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1214300 pmid:23390923
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Roubec M,
    2. Kuliha M,
    3. Procházka V, et al
    . A controlled trial of revascularization in acute stroke. Radiology 2013;266:871–78 doi:10.1148/radiol.12120798 pmid:23232292
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Ciccone A,
    2. Valvassori L,
    3. Ponzio M, et al
    ; SYNTHESIS Investigators. Intra-arterial or intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke? The SYNTHESIS pilot trial. J Neurointerv Surg 2010;2:74–79 doi:10.1136/jnis.2009.001388 pmid:21990564
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Ogawa A,
    2. Mori E,
    3. Minematsu K, et al
    ; MELT Japan Study Group. Randomized trial of intraarterial infusion of urokinase within 6 hours of middle cerebral artery stroke: the middle cerebral artery embolism local fibrinolytic intervention trial (MELT) Japan. Stroke 2007;38:2633–39 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.488551 pmid:17702958
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Macleod MR,
    2. Davis SM,
    3. Mitchell PJ, et al
    . Results of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial of intra-arterial urokinase in the treatment of acute posterior circulation ischemic stroke. Cerebrovas Dis 2005;20:12–17 doi:10.1159/000086121 pmid:15925877
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Ducrocq X,
    2. Bracard S,
    3. Taillandier L, et al
    . Comparison of intravenous and intra-arterial urokinase thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. J Neuroradiol 2005;32:26–32 doi:10.1016/S0150-9861(05)83018-4 pmid:15798610
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Furlan A,
    2. Higashida R,
    3. Wechsler L, et al
    . Intra-arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke: the PROACT II study—a randomized controlled trial, Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism. JAMA 1999;282:2003–11 doi:10.1001/jama.282.21.2003 pmid:10591382
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. del Zoppo GJ,
    2. Higashida RT,
    3. Furlan AJ, et al
    . PROACT: a phase II randomized trial of recombinant pro-urokinase by direct arterial delivery in acute middle cerebral artery stroke: PROACT Investigators—Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism. Stroke 1998;29:4–11 doi:10.1161/01.STR.29.1.4 pmid:9445320
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Lewandowski CA,
    2. Frankel M,
    3. Tomsick TA, et al
    . Combined intravenous and intra-arterial r-TPA versus intra-arterial therapy of acute ischemic stroke: Emergency Management of Stroke (EMS) Bridging Trial. Stroke 1999;30:2598–605 doi:10.1161/01.STR.30.12.2598 pmid:10582984
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Keris V,
    2. Rudnicka S,
    3. Vorona V, et al
    . Combined intraarterial/intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:352–58 pmid:11156782
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Sen S,
    2. Huang DY,
    3. Akhavan O, et al
    . IV vs. IA TPA in acute ischemic stroke with CT angiographic evidence of major vessel occlusion: a feasibility study. Neurocrit Care 2009;11:76–81 doi:10.1007/s12028-009-9204-1 pmid:19277904
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Fargen KM,
    2. Neal D,
    3. Fiorella DJ, et al
    . Meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials evaluating endovascular therapies for acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:84–89 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011543 pmid:25432979
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Fields JD,
    2. Khatri P,
    3. Nesbit GM, et al
    . Meta-analysis of randomized intra-arterial thrombolytic trials for the treatment of acute stroke due to middle cerebral artery occlusion. J Neurointerv Surg 2011;3:151–55 doi:10.1136/jnis.2010.002766 pmid:21990808
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Demchuk AM,
    2. Goyal M,
    3. Yeatts SD, et al
    ; IMS III Investigators. Recanalization and clinical outcome of occlusion sites at baseline CT angiography in the Interventional Management of Stroke III trial. Radiology 2014;273:202–10 doi:10.1148/radiol.14132649 pmid:24895878
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Higgins J,
    2. Thompson S,
    3. Deeks J, et al
    . Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practice. J Health Serv Res Policy 2002;7:51–61 doi:10.1258/1355819021927674 pmid:11822262
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Hedges LV,
    2. Vevea JL
    . Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods 1998;3:486–504 doi:10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.486
    CrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    1. Field AP
    . The problems in using fixed-effects models of meta-analysis on real-world data. Understanding Statistics 2003;2:105–24 doi:10.1207/S15328031US0202_02
    CrossRef
  35. 35.↵
    1. Owen C,
    2. Whincup PH,
    3. Gilg JA, et al
    . Effect of breast feeding in infancy on blood pressure in later life: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2003;327:1189–95 doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1189 pmid:14630752
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Thompson SG
    . Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated. BMJ 1994;309:1351–55 doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6965.1351 pmid:7866085
    FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Reid EK,
    2. Tejani AM,
    3. Huan LN, et al
    . Managing the incidence of selective reporting bias: a survey of Cochrane review groups. Syst Rev 2015;4:85 doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0070-y pmid:26071043
    CrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Garg AX,
    2. Hackam D,
    3. Tonelli M
    . Systematic review and meta-analysis: when one study is just not enough. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2008;3:253–60 doi:10.2215/CJN.01430307 pmid:18178786
    FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Powers WJ,
    2. Derdeyn CP,
    3. Biller J, et al
    ; American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2015 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Focused Update of the 2013 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Regarding Endovascular Treatment: a Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2015;46:3020–35 doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000074 pmid:26123479
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.
    1. Jadad AR,
    2. Moore RA,
    3. Carroll D, et al
    . Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996;17:1–12 doi:10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4 pmid:8721797
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 37 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 37, Issue 6
1 Jun 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Endovascular Treatment versus Best Medical Treatment in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
A.I. Qureshi, M.F. Ishfaq, H.A. Rahman, A.P. Thomas
Endovascular Treatment versus Best Medical Treatment in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2016, 37 (6) 1068-1073; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4775

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Endovascular Treatment versus Best Medical Treatment in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
A.I. Qureshi, M.F. Ishfaq, H.A. Rahman, A.P. Thomas
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2016, 37 (6) 1068-1073; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4775
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATION:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Effect of the interaction between atrial fibrillation and rt-PA dose on the prognosis of acute ischaemic stroke with intravenous thrombolysis
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

Neurointervention

  • A Retrospective Study in Tentorial DAVFs
  • Proximal Protection Devices for Carotid Stenting
  • Rescue Reentry in Carotid Near-Occlusion
Show more Neurointervention

Adult Brain

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology of Monoclonal Antibodies
  • Clinical Outcomes After Chiari I Decompression
  • Segmentation of Brain Metastases with BLAST
Show more Adult Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire