Current Trends and Results of Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms at a Single Institution in the Flow-Diverter Era

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Yu SC,
   3. Kwok CK,
   4. Cheng PW, et al

   . Intracranial aneurysms: midterm outcome of Pipeline embolization device—a prospective study in 143 patients with 178 aneurysms. Radiology 2012;265:893–901 doi:10.1148/radiol.12120422 pmid:22996749

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Saatci I,
   3. Yavuz K,
   4. Ozer C, et al

   . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the Pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1436–46 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3246 pmid:22821921

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Deutschmann HA,
   3. Wehrschuetz M,
   4. Augustin M, et al

   . Long-term follow-up after treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: results from a single center. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:481–86 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2790 pmid:22158922

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Maimon S,
   3. Gonen L,
   4. Nossek E, et al

   . Treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms with the SILK flow diverter: 2 years' experience with 28 patients at a single center. Acta Neurochir 2012;154:979–87 doi:10.1007/s00701-012-1316-2 pmid:22402875

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Chiu AH,
   3. Cheung AK,
   4. Wenderoth JD, et al

   . Long-term follow-up results following elective treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1728–34 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4329 pmid:25999412

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. McAuliffe W,
   3. Wycoco V,
   4. Rice H, et al

   . Immediate and midterm results following treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:164–70 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2727 pmid:21979492

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Lanzino G

   . Editorial: flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2013;118:405–06; discussion 406–07 doi:10.3171/2012.7.JNS12593 pmid:23176330

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. McDonald RJ,
   3. McDonald JS,
   4. Kallmes DF, et al

   . Periprocedural safety of Pipeline therapy for unruptured cerebral aneurysms: analysis of 279 patients in a multihospital database. Interv Neuroradiol 2015;21:6–10 doi:10.1177/1591019915576289 pmid:25934768

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Burrows AM,
   3. Cloft H,
   4. Kallmes DF, et al

   . Periprocedural and mid-term technical and clinical events after flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:646–51 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011184 pmid:25082803

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Cruz JP,
    3. Chow M,
    4. O'Kelly C, et al

    . Delayed ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage following flow diversion for the treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:603–08 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3065 pmid:22403783

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Crobeddu E,
    3. Lanzino G,
    4. Kallmes DF, et al

    . Marked decrease in coil and stent utilization following introduction of flow diversion technology. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5:351–53 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010320 pmid:22544822

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. de Barros Faria M,
    3. Castro RN,
    4. Lundquist J, et al

    . The role of the Pipeline embolization device for the treatment of dissecting intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:2192–95 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2671 pmid:21885721

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Kulcsár Z,
    3. Ernemann U,
    4. Wetzel SG, et al

    . High-profile flow diverter (Silk) implantation in the basilar artery: efficacy in the treatment of aneurysms and the role of the perforators. Stroke 2010;41:1690–96 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.580308 pmid:20616327

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Pistocchi S,
    3. Blanc R,
    4. Bartolini B, et al

    . Flow diverters at and beyond the level of the circle of Willis for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2012;43:1032–38 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.636019 pmid:22282890

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Lanzino G,
    3. Crobeddu E,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al

    . Efficacy and safety of flow diversion for paraclinoid aneurysms: a matched-pair analysis compared with standard endovascular approaches. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:2158–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3207 pmid:22790243

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Shigematsu T,
    3. Fujinaka T,
    4. Yoshimine T, et al

    ; JR-NET Investigators. Endovascular therapy for asymptomatic unruptured intracranial aneurysms: JR-NET and JR-NET2 findings. Stroke 2013;44:2735–42 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000609 pmid:23899916

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Pierot L,
    3. Spelle L,
    4. Vitry F

    . Immediate anatomic results after the endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: analysis of the ATENA series. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:140–44 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1745 pmid:19729540

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Oishi H,
    3. Yamamoto M,
    4. Shimizu T, et al

    . Endovascular therapy of 500 small asymptomatic unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:958–64 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2858 pmid:22241382

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Gonzalez N,
    3. Murayama Y,
    4. Nien YL, et al

    . Treatment of unruptured aneurysms with GDCs: clinical experience with 247 aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:577–83 pmid:15090345

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. van Rooij WJ,
    3. Sluzewski M

    . Durability of treatment of intracranial aneurysms with Hydrocoils is not different from standard platinum coils. Stroke 2006;37:2874; author reply 2875 pmid:17053187

    FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Yue W

    . Endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 2011;17:420–24 doi:10.1177/159101991101700404 pmid:22192544

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Song JH,
    3. Chang IB,
    4. Ahn JH, et al

    . Angiographic results of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms treated with coil embolization: a single center experience. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2015;57:250–57 doi:10.3340/jkns.2015.57.4.250 pmid:25932291

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Raymond J,
    3. Guilbert F,
    4. Weill A, et al

    . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000073841.88563.E9 pmid:12775880

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Becske T,
    3. Kallmes DF,
    4. Saatci I, et al

    . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Lylyk P,
    3. Miranda C,
    4. Ceratto R, et al

    . Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 2009;64:632–42; discussion 642–43; quiz N6 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000339109.98070.65 pmid:19349825

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Zanaty M,
    4. Whiting A, et al

    . Safety and efficacy of the Pipeline embolization device in 100 small intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2015;122:1498–502 doi:10.3171/2014.12.JNS14411 pmid:25635478

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Starke RM,
    4. Yang S, et al

    . Extending the indications of flow diversion to small, unruptured, saccular aneurysms of the anterior circulation. Stroke 2014;45:54–58 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003038 pmid:24253543

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Zanaty M,
    3. Chalouhi N,
    4. Starke RM, et al

    . Flow diversion versus conventional treatment for carotid cavernous aneurysms. Stroke 2014;45:2656–61 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006247 pmid:25052318

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Hanel R,
    4. Lopes D, et al

    . International retrospective study of the Pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:108–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4111 pmid:25355814

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    2. Briganti F,
    3. Napoli M,
    4. Tortora F, et al

    . Italian multicenter experience with flow-diverter devices for intracranial unruptured aneurysm treatment with periprocedural complications–a retrospective data analysis. Neuroradiology 2012;54:1145–52 doi:10.1007/s00234-012-1047-3 pmid:22569955

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Murad MH,
    4. Lanzino G, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:442–47 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.678151 pmid:23321438

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. Berge J,
    3. Biondi A,
    4. Machi P, et al

    . Flow-diverter Silk stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 1-year follow-up in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1150–55 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2907 pmid:22300924

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    2. Leonardi M,
    3. Cirillo L,
    4. Toni F, et al

    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using flow-diverting Silk stents (BALT): a single centre experience. Interv Neuroradiol 2011;17:306–15 pmid:22005692

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    2. Velioglu M,
    3. Kizilkilic O,
    4. Selcuk H, et al

    . Early and midterm results of complex cerebral aneurysms treated with Silk stent. Neuroradiology 2012;54:1355–65 doi:10.1007/s00234-012-1051-7 pmid:22695740

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Arias EJ,
    3. Patel B,
    4. Cross DT 3rd., et al

    . Timing and nature of in-house postoperative events following uncomplicated elective endovascular aneurysm treatment. J Neurosurg 2014;121:1063–70 doi:10.3171/2014.7.JNS132676 pmid:25170666

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Eisen SH,
    3. Hindman BJ,
    4. Bayman EO, et al

    . Elective endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a management case series of patient outcomes after institutional change to admit patients principally to postanesthesia care unit rather than to intensive care. Anesth Analg 2015;121:188–97 doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000000699 pmid:25806401

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    2. Burrows AM,
    3. Rabinstein AA,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al

    . Are routine intensive care admissions needed after endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:2199–201 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3566 pmid:23744695

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    2. Molyneux A,
    3. Kerr R,
    4. Stratton I, et al

    ; International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–74 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11314-6 pmid:12414200

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science