Geometric Parameter Analysis of Ruptured and Unruptured Aneurysms in Patients with Symmetric Bilateral Intracranial Aneurysms: A Multicenter CT Angiography Study

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Vlak MH,
   3. Algra A,
   4. Brandenburg R, et al

   . Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2011;10:626–36 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70109-0 pmid:21641282

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Li MH,
   3. Chen SW,
   4. Li YD, et al

   . Prevalence of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in Chinese adults aged 35 to 75 years: a cross-sectional study. Ann Intern Med 2013;159:514–21 doi:10.7326/0003-4819-159-8-201310150-00004 pmid:24126645

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Van Gijn J,
   3. Kerr RS,
   4. Rinkel GJ

   . Subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet 2007;369:306–18 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60153-6 pmid:17258671

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Ingall T,
   3. Asplund K,
   4. Mähönen M, et al

   . A multinational comparison of subarachnoid hemorrhage epidemiology in the WHO MONICA stroke study. Stroke 2000;31:1054–61 doi:10.1161/01.STR.31.5.1054 pmid:10797165

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Baharoglu MI,
   3. Schirmer CM,
   4. Hoit DA, et al

   . Aneurysm inflow-angle as a discriminant for rupture in sidewall cerebral aneurysms: morphometric and computational fluid dynamic analysis. Stroke 2010;41:1423–30 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.570770 pmid:20508183

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Dhar S,
   3. Tremmel M,
   4. Mocco J, et al

   . Morphology parameters for intracranial aneurysm rupture risk assessment. Neurosurgery 2008;63:185–96; discussion 196–97 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000316847.64140.81 pmid:18797347

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Tremmel M,
   3. Dhar S,
   4. Levy EI, et al

   . Influence of intracranial aneurysm-to-parent vessel size ratio on hemodynamics and implication for rupture: results from a virtual experimental study. Neurosurgery 2009;64:622–30; discussion 630–31 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000341529.11231.69 pmid:19349824

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Jeon JS,
   3. Ahn JH,
   4. Huh W, et al

   . A retrospective analysis on the natural history of incidental small paraclinoid unruptured aneurysm. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014;85:289–94 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2013-305019 pmid:23781005

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Greving JP,
   3. Wermer MJ,
   4. Brown RD JR., et al

   . Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:59–66 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70263-1 pmid:24290159

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Wiebers DO,
    3. Whisnant JP,
    4. Huston J III., et al

    ; International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003;362:103–10 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13860-3 pmid:12867109

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Lubicz B,
    3. Levivier M,
    4. François O, et al

    . Sixty-four-row multisection CT angiography for detection and evaluation of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: interobserver and intertechnique reproducibility. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1949–55 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0699 pmid:17898200

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Forbes G,
    3. Fox AJ,
    4. Huston J 3rd., et al

    . Interobserver variability in angiographic measurement and morphologic characterization of intracranial aneurysms: a report from the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:1407–15 pmid:8883634

    Abstract
13. 13.↵
    2. Lin N,
    3. Ho A,
    4. Gross BA, et al

    . Differences in simple morphological variables in ruptured and unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2012;117:913–19 doi:10.3171/2012.7.JNS111766 pmid:22957531

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Morita A,
    3. Kirino T,
    4. Hashi K, et al

    ; UCAS Japan Investigators. The natural course of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. N Engl J Med 2012;366:2474–82 doi:10.1056/NEJMoal113260 pmid:22738097

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1725–33 doi:10.1056/NEJM199812103392401 pmid:9867550

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Baharoglu MI,
    3. Lauric A,
    4. Gao BL, et al

    . Identification of a dichotomy in morphological predictors of rupture status between sidewall- and bifurcation-type intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2012;116:871–81 doi:10.3171/2011.11.JNS11311 pmid:22242668

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Flores BC,
    3. Scott WW,
    4. Eddleman CS, et al

    . The A1–A2 diameter ratio may influence formation and rupture potential of anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2013;73:845–53; discussion 852–53 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000125 pmid:23921706

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Rahman M,
    3. Ogilvy CS,
    4. Zipfel GJ, et al

    . Unruptured cerebral aneurysms do not shrink when they rupture: multicenter collaborative aneurysm study group. Neurosurgery 2011;68:155–60; discussion 160–61 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181ff357c pmid:21150760

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Beck J,
    3. Rohde S,
    4. el Beltagy M, et al

    . Difference in configuration of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms determined by biplanar digital subtraction angiography. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2003;145:861–65; discussion 865 doi:10.1007/s00701-003-0124-0 pmid:14577007

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. de Rooij NK,
    3. Velthuis BK,
    4. Algra A, et al

    . Configuration of the circle of Willis, direction of flow, and shape of the aneurysm as risk factors for rupture of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurol 2009;256:45–50 doi:10.1007/s00415-009-0028-x pmid:19221852

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Rohde S,
    3. Lahmann K,
    4. Beck J, et al

    . Fourier analysis of intracranial aneurysms: towards an objective and quantitative evaluation of the shape of aneurysms. Neuroradiology 2005;47:121–26 pmid:15688203

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Backes D,
    3. Vergouwen MD,
    4. Velthuis BK, et al

    . Difference in aneurysm characteristics between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms in patients with multiple intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2014;45:1299–303 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.004421 pmid:24652309

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Amenta PS,
    3. Yadla S,
    4. Campbell PG, et al

    . Analysis of nonmodifiable risk factors for intracranial aneurysm rupture in a large, retrospective cohort. Neurosurgery 2012;70:693–99; discussion 699–701 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182354d68 pmid:21904261

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Ujiie H,
    3. Tamano Y,
    4. Sasaki K, et al

    . Is the aspect ratio a reliable index for predicting the rupture of a saccular aneurysm? Neurosurgery 2001;48:495–502; discussion 502–03 doi:10.1097/00006123-200103000-00007 pmid:11270538

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Nader-Sepahi A,
    3. Casimiro M,
    4. Sen J, et al

    . Is aspect ratio a reliable predictor of intracranial aneurysm rupture? Neurosurgery 2004;54:1343–47; discussion 1347–48 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000124482.03676.8B pmid:15157290

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Weir B,
    3. Amidei C,
    4. Kongable G, et al

    . The aspect ratio (dome/neck) of ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2003;99:447–51 doi:10.3171/jns.2003.99.3.0447 pmid:12959428

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Lauric A,
    3. Baharoglu MI,
    4. Malek AM

    . Ruptured status discrimination performance of aspect ratio, height/width, and bottleneck factor is highly dependent on aneurysm sizing methodology. Neurosurgery 2012;71:38–45 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182503bf9 pmid:22353797

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Ryu CW,
    3. Kwon OK,
    4. Koh JS, et al

    . Analysis of aneurysm rupture in relation to the geometric indices: aspect ratio, volume, and volume-to-neck ratio. Neuroradiology 2011;53:883–89 doi:10.1007/s00234-010-0804-4 pmid:21107548

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Sadatomo T,
    3. Yuki K,
    4. Migita K, et al

    . Morphological differences between ruptured and unruptured cases in middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2008;62:602–09; discussion 602–09 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000311347.35583.0C pmid:18301349

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Xiang J,
    3. Natarajan SK,
    4. Tremmel M, et al

    . Hemodynamic-morphologic discriminants for intracranial aneurysm rupture. Stroke 2011;42:144–52 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.592923 pmid:21106956

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Hoh BL,
    3. Sistrom CL,
    4. Firment CS, et al

    . Bottleneck factor and height-width ratio: association with ruptured aneurysms in patients with multiple cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2007;61:716–22 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000298899.77097.BF pmid:17986932

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. You SH,
    3. Kong DS,
    4. Kim JS, et al

    . Characteristic features of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: predictive risk factors for aneurysm rupture. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2010;81:479–84 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2008.169573 pmid:19726404

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    2. Jiang Y,
    3. Lan Q,
    4. Wang Q, et al

    . Correlation between the rupture risk and 3D geometric parameters of saccular intracranial aneurysms. Cell Biochem Biophys 2014;70:1417–20 doi:10.1007/s12013-014-0074-6 pmid:24938901

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Takao H,
    3. Murayama Y,
    4. Otsuka S, et al

    . Hemodynamic differences between unruptured and ruptured intracranial aneurysms during observation. Stroke 2012;43:1436–39 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.640995 pmid:22363053

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    2. Tateshima S,
    3. Chien A,
    4. Sayre J, et al

    . The effect of aneurysm geometry on the intra-aneurysmal flow condition. Neuroradiology 2010;52:1135–41 doi:10.1007/s00234-010-0687-4 pmid:20373097

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    2. Lauric A,
    3. Hippelheuser J,
    4. Cohen AD, et al

    . Wall shear stress association with rupture status in volume matched sidewall aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6:466–73 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010871 pmid:23929550

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    2. Goubergrits L,
    3. Schaller J,
    4. Kertzscher U, et al

    . Statistical wall shear stress maps of ruptured and unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms. J R Soc Interface 2012;9:677–88 doi:10.1098/rsif.2011.0490 pmid:21957117

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    2. Jou LD,
    3. Lee DH,
    4. Morsi H, et al

    . Wall shear stress on ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms at the internal carotid artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1761–67 doi:10.3174/ajnr.AL180 pmid:18599576

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    2. McKinney AM,
    3. Palmer CS,
    4. Truwit CL, et al

    . Detection of aneurysms by 64-section multidetector CT angiography in patients acutely suspected of having an intracranial aneurysm and comparison with digital subtraction and 3D rotational angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:594–602 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0848 pmid:18065510

    Abstract/FREE Full Text