Advertisement

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurointervention

Fate of Coiled Aneurysms with Minor Recanalization at 6 Months: Rate of Progression to Further Recanalization and Related Risk Factors

J.P. Jeon, Y.D. Cho, J.K. Rhim, D.H. Yoo, W.-S. Cho, H.-S. Kang, J.E. Kim and M.H. Han
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2016, 37 (8) 1490-1495; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4763

References

  1. 1.↵
    2. Kwon SC,
    3. Kwon OK
    ; Korean Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm Coiling (KUCAC) Investigators. Endovascular coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a Korean multicenter study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014;156:847–54 doi:10.1007/s00701-014-2033-9 pmid:24610449
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    2. Raymond J,
    3. Guilbert F,
    4. Weill A, et al
    . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000073841.88563.E9 pmid:12775880
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    2. Ries T,
    3. Siemonsen S,
    4. Thomalla G, et al
    . Long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms after endovascular therapy—prediction and outcome of retreatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1755–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0649 pmid:17885238
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    2. Lejeune JP,
    3. Thines L,
    4. Taschner C, et al
    . Neurosurgical treatment for aneurysm remnants or recurrences after coil occlusion. Neurosurgery 2008;63:684–91; discussion 691–92 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000325499.82876.6D pmid:18981879
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    2. Lin T,
    3. Fox AJ,
    4. Drake CG
    . Regrowth of aneurysm sacs from residual neck following aneurysm clipping. J Neurosurg 1989;70:556–60 doi:10.3171/jns.1989.70.4.0556 pmid:2926496
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    2. Cho YD,
    3. Jeon JP,
    4. Rhim JK, et al
    . Progressive thrombosis of small saccular aneurysms filled with contrast immediately after coil embolization: analysis of related factors and long-term follow-up. Neuroradiology 2015;57:615–23 doi:10.1007/s00234-015-1514-8 pmid:25808124
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    2. White PM,
    3. Lewis SC,
    4. Nahser H, et al
    ; HELPS Trial Collaboration. HydroCoil Endovascular Aneurysm Occlusion and Packing Study (HELPS trial): procedural safety and operator-assessed efficacy results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:217–23 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0936 pmid:18184832
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    2. Cho YD,
    3. Lee WJ,
    4. Kim KM, et al
    . Stent-assisted coil embolization of posterior communicating artery aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:2171–76 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3541 pmid:23660292
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    2. Cognard C,
    3. Weill A,
    4. Spelle L, et al
    . Long-term angiographic follow-up of 169 intracranial berry aneurysms occluded with detachable coils. Radiology 1999;212:348–56 doi:10.1148/radiology.212.2.r99jl47348 pmid:10429689
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    2. Sluzewski M,
    3. van Rooij WJ,
    4. Slob MJ, et al
    . Relation between aneurysm volume, packing, and compaction in 145 cerebral aneurysms treated with coils. Radiology 2004;231:653–58 doi:10.1148/radiol.2313030460 pmid:15118115
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    2. Morales HG,
    3. Kim M,
    4. Vivas EE, et al
    . How do coil configuration and packing density influence intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1935–41 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2635 pmid:21885712
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    2. van Rooij WJ,
    3. Sprengers ME,
    4. Sluzewski M, et al
    . Intracranial aneurysms that repeatedly reopen over time after coiling: imaging characteristics and treatment outcome. Neuroradiology 2007;49:343–49 doi:10.1007/s00234-006-0200-2 pmid:17216264
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    2. Niimi Y,
    3. Song J,
    4. Madrid M, et al
    . Endosaccular treatment of intracranial aneurysms using Matrix coils: early experience and midterm follow-up. Stroke 2006;37:1028–32 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000206459.73897.a3 pmid:16514098
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    2. Hetts SW,
    3. Turk A,
    4. English JD, et al
    ; Matrix and Platinum Science Trial Investigators. Stent-assisted coiling versus coiling alone in unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the Matrix and Platinum Science trial: safety, efficacy, and mid-term outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:698–705 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3755 pmid:24184523
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    2. McDougall CG,
    3. Johnston SC,
    4. Gholkar A, et al
    ; MAPS Investigators. Bioactive versus bare platinum coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: the MAPS (Matrix and Platinum Science) trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:935–42 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3857 pmid:24481333
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    2. Ogilvy CS,
    3. Chua MH,
    4. Fusco MR, et al
    . Validation of a system to predict recanalization after endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2015;77:168–73; discussion 173–74 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000744 pmid:25850603
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    2. Luo B,
    3. Yang X,
    4. Wang S, et al
    . High shear stress and flow velocity in partially occluded aneurysms prone to recanalization. Stroke 2011;42:745–53 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.593517 pmid:21233477
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    2. Irie K,
    3. Anzai H,
    4. Kojima M, et al
    . Computational fluid dynamic analysis following recurrence of cerebral aneurysm after coil embolization. Asian J Neurosurg 2012;7:109–15 doi:10.4103/1793-5482.103706 pmid:23293665
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    2. Li C,
    3. Wang S,
    4. Chen J, et al
    . Influence of hemodynamics on recanalization of totally occluded intracranial aneurysms: a patient-specific computational fluid dynamic simulation study. J Neurosurg 2012;117:276–83 doi:10.3171/2012.5.JNS111558 pmid:22680247
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    2. Ortega J,
    3. Hartman J,
    4. Rodriguez J, et al
    . Post-treatment hemodynamics of a basilar aneurysm and bifurcation. Ann Biomed Eng 2008;36:1531–46 doi:10.1007/s10439-008-9535-7 pmid:18629647
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    2. Lawson MF,
    3. Newman WC,
    4. Chi YY, et al
    . Stent-associated flow remodeling causes further occlusion of incompletely coiled aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2011;69:598–603; discussion 603–04 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182181c2b pmid:21430583
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Jabbour P,
    4. Singhal S, et al
    . Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: predictors of complications, recanalization, and outcome in 508 cases. Stroke 2013;44:1348–53 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000641 pmid:23512976
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    2. Hwang SK,
    3. Hwang G,
    4. Bang JS, et al
    . Endovascular Enterprise stent-assisted coil embolization for wide-necked unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Clin Neurosci 2013;20:1276–79 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2012.11.010 pmid:23830596
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    2. Luo CB,
    3. Teng MM,
    4. Chang FC, et al
    . Stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms: a single center experience. J Chin Med Assoc 2012;75:322–28 doi:10.1016/j.jcma.2012.05.003 pmid:22824046
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    2. Cho WS,
    3. Hong HS,
    4. Kang HS, et al
    . Stability of cerebral aneurysms after stent-assisted coil embolization: a propensity score-matched analysis. Neurosurgery 2015;77:208–16; discussion 216–17 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000759 pmid:25839376
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    2. Cho YD,
    3. Lee JY,
    4. Seo JH, et al
    . Does stent implantation improve the result of repeat embolization in recanalized aneurysms? Neurosurgery 2012;71(2 suppl operative):ons253–59; discussion ons259 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182647a97 pmid:23160430
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    2. Jeon JP,
    3. Cho YD,
    4. Rhim JK, et al
    . Effect of stenting on progressive occlusion of small unruptured saccular intracranial aneurysms with residual sac immediately after coil embolization: a propensity score analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2015 Oct 27. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011947 pmid:26508130
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    2. Cho YD,
    3. Kim KM,
    4. Lee WJ, et al
    . Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for follow-up of coil embolization with Enterprise stent for intracranial aneurysm: usefulness of source images. Korean J Radiol 2014;15:161–68 doi:10.3348/kjr.2014.15.1.161 pmid:24497808
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    2. Choi JW,
    3. Roh HG,
    4. Moon WJ, et al
    . Optimization of MR parameters of 3D TOF-MRA for various intracranial stents at 3.0T MRI. Neurointervention 2011;6:71–77 doi:10.5469/neuroint.2011.6.2.71 pmid:22125752
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    2. van Amerongen MJ,
    3. Boogaarts HD,
    4. de Vries J, et al
    . MRA versus DSA for follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1655–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3700 pmid:24008171
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article
Cite this article
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Bookmark this article
Fate of Coiled Aneurysms with Minor Recanalization at 6 Months: Rate of Progression to Further Recanalization and Related Risk Factors
J.P. Jeon, Y.D. Cho, J.K. Rhim, D.H. Yoo, W.-S. Cho, H.-S. Kang, J.E. Kim, M.H. Han
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2016, 37 (8) 1490-1495; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4763
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Purchase

Jump to section

Advertisement