The Effects of Acetazolamide on the Evaluation of Cerebral Hemodynamics and Functional Connectivity Using Blood Oxygen Level–Dependent MR Imaging in Patients with Chronic Steno-Occlusive Disease of the Anterior Circulation

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Merino JG,
   3. Warach S

   . Imaging of acute stroke. Nat Rev Neurol 2010;6:560–71 doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2010.129 pmid:20842186

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Dani KA,
   3. Thomas RGR,
   4. Chappell FM, et al

   ; Translational Medicine Research Collaboration Multicentre Acute Stroke Imaging Study. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in ischemic stroke: definitions and thresholds. Ann Neurol 2011;70:384–401 doi:10.1002/ana.22500 pmid:21796665

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Latchaw RE,
   3. Yonas H,
   4. Hunter GJ, et al

   ; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology of the American Heart Association. Guidelines and recommendations for perfusion imaging in cerebral ischemia: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals by the writing group on perfusion imaging, from the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology of the American Heart Association. Stroke 2003;34:1084–104 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000064840.99271.9E pmid:12677088

   FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Marks MP,
   3. Lansberg MG,
   4. Mlynash M, et al

   ; DEFUSE Investigators. Angiographic outcome of endovascular stroke therapy correlated with MR findings, infarct growth, and clinical outcome in the DEFUSE 2 trial. Int J Stroke 2014;9:860–65 doi:10.1111/ijs.12271 pmid:24684804

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Lansberg MG,
   3. Straka M,
   4. Kemp S, et al

   ; DEFUSE 2 study investigators. MRI profile and response to endovascular reperfusion after stroke (DEFUSE 2): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:860–67 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70203-X pmid:22954705

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Saver JL,
   3. Goyal M,
   4. Bonafe A, et al

   ; SWIFT PRIME Investigators. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2285–95 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1415061 pmid:25882376

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Jovin TG,
   3. Chamorro A,
   4. Cobo E, et al

   ; REVASCAT Trial Investigators. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2296–306 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1503780 pmid:25882510

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Campbell BCV,
   3. Christensen S,
   4. Levi CR, et al

   . Comparison of computed tomography perfusion and magnetic resonance imaging perfusion-diffusion mismatch in ischemic stroke. Stroke 2012;43:2648–53 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.660548 pmid:22858726

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Saver JL,
   3. Goyal M,
   4. Bonafe A, et al

   ; SWIFT PRIME Investigators. Solitaire™ with the Intention for Thrombectomy as Primary Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke (SWIFT PRIME) trial: protocol for a randomized, controlled, multicenter study comparing the Solitaire revascularization device with IV tPA with IV tPA alone in acute ischemic stroke. Int J Stroke 2015;10:439–48 doi:10.1111/ijs.12459 pmid:25777831

   FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Østergaard L

    . Principles of cerebral perfusion imaging by bolus tracking. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:710–17 doi:10.1002/jmri.20460 pmid:16261573

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. McDonald RJ,
    3. McDonald JS,
    4. Kallmes DF, et al

    . Intracranial gadolinium deposition after contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2015;275:772–82 doi:10.1148/radiol.15150025 pmid:25742194

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Ovadia-Caro S,
    3. Margulies DS,
    4. Villringer A

    . The value of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging in stroke. Stroke 2014;45:2818–24 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.003689 pmid:25013022

    FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Petersen ET,
    3. Zimine I,
    4. Ho YC, et al

    . Non-invasive measurement of perfusion: a critical review of arterial spin labelling techniques. Br J Radiol 2006;79:688–701 doi:10.1259/bjr/67705974 pmid:16861326

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Bokkers RP,
    3. Hernandez DA,
    4. Merino JG, et al

    ; National Institutes of Health Stroke Natural History Investigators. Whole-brain arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI in patients with acute stroke. Stroke 2012;43:1290–94 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.589234 pmid:22426319

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Villringer A,
    3. Dirnagl U

    . Coupling of brain activity and cerebral blood flow: basis of functional neuroimaging. Cerebrovasc Brain Metab Rev 1995;7:240–76 pmid:8519605

    PubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Christen T,
    3. Jahanian H,
    4. Ni WW, et al

    . Noncontrast mapping of arterial delay and functional connectivity using resting-state functional MRI: a study in Moyamoya patients. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;41:424–30 doi:10.1002/jmri.24558 pmid:24419985

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Amemiya S,
    3. Kunimatsu A,
    4. Saito N, et al

    . Cerebral hemodynamic impairment: assessment with resting-state functional MR imaging. Radiology 2014;270:548–55 doi:10.1148/radiol.13130982 pmid:24072777

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Lv Y,
    3. Margulies DS,
    4. Cameron Craddock R, et al

    . Identifying the perfusion deficit in acute stroke with resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 2013;73:136–40 doi:10.1002/ana.23763 pmid:23378326

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Fox MD,
    3. Raichle ME

    . Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007;8:700–11 doi:10.1038/nrn2201 pmid:17704812

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Smith SM,
    3. Fox PT,
    4. Miller KL, et al

    . Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:13040–45 doi:10.1073/pnas.0905267106 pmid:19620724

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. van den Heuvel MP,
    3. Hulshoff Pol HE

    . Exploring the brain network: a review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2010;20:519–34 doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2010.03.008 pmid:20471808

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Chang TY,
    3. Huang KL,
    4. Ho MY, et al

    . Graph theoretical analysis of functional networks and its relationship to cognitive decline in patients with carotid stenosis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2016;36:808–18 pmid:26661184

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Cheng HL,
    3. Lin CJ,
    4. Soong BW, et al

    . Impairments in cognitive function and brain connectivity in severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke 2012;43:2567–73 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.645614 pmid:22935402

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Gupta A,
    3. Chazen JL,
    4. Hartman M, et al

    . Cerebrovascular reserve and stroke risk in patients with carotid stenosis or occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2012;43:2884–91 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.663716 pmid:23091119

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Vagal AS,
    3. Leach JL,
    4. Fernandez-Ulloa M, et al

    . The acetazolamide challenge: techniques and applications in the evaluation of chronic cerebral ischemia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:876–84 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1538 pmid:19246526

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Siero JC,
    3. Hartkamp NS,
    4. Donahue MJ, et al

    . Neuronal activation induced BOLD and CBF responses upon acetazolamide administration in patients with steno-occlusive artery disease. Neuroimage 2015;105:276–85 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.033 pmid:25261002

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Straka M,
    3. Albers GW,
    4. Bammer R

    . Real-time diffusion-perfusion mismatch analysis in acute stroke. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;32:1024–37 doi:10.1002/jmri.22338 pmid:21031505

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Biswal B,
    3. Yetkin FZ,
    4. Haughton VM, et al

    . Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:537–41 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910340409 pmid:8524021

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Shirer WR,
    3. Ryali S,
    4. Rykhlevskaia E, et al

    . Decoding subject-driven cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns. Cereb Cortex 2012;22:158–65 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr099 pmid:21616982

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    2. Albers GW,
    3. Thijs VN,
    4. Wechsler L, et al

    ; DEFUSE Investigators. Magnetic resonance imaging profiles predict clinical response to early reperfusion: the diffusion and perfusion imaging evaluation for understanding stroke evolution (DEFUSE) study. Ann Neurol 2006;60:508–17 doi:10.1002/ana.20976 pmid:17066483

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    2. Amemiya S,
    3. Takao H,
    4. Hanaoka S, et al

    . Global and structured waves of rs-fMRI signal identified as putative propagation of spontaneous neural activity. Neuroimage 2016;133:331–40 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.033 pmid:27012499

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Blicher JU,
    3. Stagg CJ,
    4. O'Shea J, et al

    . Visualization of altered neurovascular coupling in chronic stroke patients using multimodal functional MRI. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2012;32:2044–54 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2012.105 pmid:22828998

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    2. Brown GG,
    3. Eyler Zorrilla LT,
    4. Georgy B, et al

    . BOLD and perfusion response to finger-thumb apposition after acetazolamide administration: differential relationship to global perfusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2003;23:829–37 pmid:12843786

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    2. Preibisch C,
    3. Castrillón G JG,
    4. Bührer M, et al

    . Evaluation of multiband EPI acquisitions for resting state fMRI. PLoS One 2015;10:e0136961 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136961 pmid:26375666

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Feinberg DA,
    3. Moeller S,
    4. Smith SM, et al

    . Multiplexed echo planar imaging for sub-second whole brain FMRI and fast diffusion imaging. PLoS One 2010;5:e15710 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015710 pmid:21187930

    CrossRefPubMed