First-Pass Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography in Evaluation of Treated Spinal Arteriovenous Fistulas: Is Catheter Angiography Necessary?

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Bakker NA,
   3. Uyttenboogaart M,
   4. Luijckx GJ, et al

   . Recurrence rates after surgical or endovascular treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. Neurosurgery 2015;77:137–44; discussion 144 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000727 pmid:25790071

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Mascalchi M,
   3. Ferrito G,
   4. Quilici N, et al

   . Spinal vascular malformations: MR angiography after treatment. Radiology 2001;219:346–53 doi:10.1148/radiology.219.2.r01ap26346 pmid:11323455

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Ali S,
   3. Cashen TA,
   4. Carroll TJ, et al

   . Time-resolved spinal MR angiography: initial clinical experience in the evaluation of spinal arteriovenous shunts. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1806–10 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0639 pmid:17885246

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Brinjikji W,
   3. Nasr DM,
   4. Morris JM, et al

   . Clinical outcomes of patients with delayed diagnosis of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:380–86 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4504 pmid:26338916

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Forbes G,
   3. Nichols DA,
   4. Jack CR Jr., et al

   . Complications of spinal cord arteriography: prospective assessment of risk for diagnostic procedures. Radiology 1988;169:479–84 doi:10.1148/radiology.169.2.3174997 pmid:3174997

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Willinsky RA,
   3. terBrugge K,
   4. Montanera W, et al

   . Posttreatment MR findings in spinal dural arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:2063–71 pmid:8585495

   Abstract
7. 7.↵
   2. Kaufmann TJ,
   3. Morris JM,
   4. Saladino A, et al

   . Magnetic resonance imaging findings in treated spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: lack of correlation with clinical outcomes. J Neurosurg Spine 2011;14:548–54 doi:10.3171/2010.11.SPINE10178 pmid:21275553

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Condette-Auliac S,
   3. Boulin A,
   4. Roccatagliata L, et al

   . MRI and MRA of spinal cord arteriovenous shunts. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;40:1253–66 doi:10.1002/jmri.24591 pmid:24591106

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Amarouche M,
   3. Hart JL,
   4. Siddiqui A, et al

   . Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography of spinal vascular malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:417–22 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4164 pmid:25395661

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Lindenholz A,
    3. TerBrugge KG,
    4. van Dijk JM, et al

    . The accuracy and utility of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for localization of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: the Toronto experience. Eur Radiol 2014;24:2885–94 doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3307-6 pmid:25015136

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Song JK,
    3. Viñuela F,
    4. Gobin YP, et al

    . Surgical and endovascular treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: long-term disability assessment and prognostic factors. J Neurosurg Spine 2001;94:199–204 doi:10.3171/spi.2001.94.2.0199

    CrossRef
12. 12.↵
    2. Horikoshi T,
    3. Hida K,
    4. Iwasaki Y, et al

    . Chronological changes in MRI findings of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula. Surg Neurol 2000;53:243–49 doi:10.1016/S0090-3019(99)00168-8 pmid:10773256

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Morris JM

    . Imaging of dural arteriovenous fistula. Radiol Clin North Am 2012;50:823–39 doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2012.04.011 pmid:22643397

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Luetmer PH,
    3. Lane JI,
    4. Gilbertson JR, et al

    . Preangiographic evaluation of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas with elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and effect on radiation dose and volume of iodinated contrast material. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:711–18 pmid:15814910

    Abstract/FREE Full Text