Comparison of Time-Resolved and First-Pass Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography in Pretherapeutic Evaluation of Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Hurst RW,
   3. Kenyon LC,
   4. Lavi E, et al

   . Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula: the pathology of venous hypertensive myelopathy. Neurology 1995;45:1309–13 doi:10.1212/WNL.45.7.1309 pmid:7617189

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Atkinson JL,
   3. Miller GM,
   4. Krauss WE, et al

   . Clinical and radiographic features of dural arteriovenous fistula, a treatable cause of myelopathy. Mayo Clin Proc 2001;76:1120–30 doi:10.4065/76.11.1120 pmid:11702900

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Brinjikji W,
   3. Nasr DM,
   4. Morris JM, et al

   . Clinical outcomes of patients with delayed diagnosis of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:380–86 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4504 pmid:26338916

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Luetmer PH,
   3. Lane JI,
   4. Gilbertson JR, et al

   . Preangiographic evaluation of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas with elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and effect on radiation dose and volume of iodinated contrast material. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:711–18 pmid:15814910

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Saindane AM,
   3. Boddu SR,
   4. Tong FC, et al

   . Contrast-enhanced time-resolved MRA for pre-angiographic evaluation of suspected spinal dural arterial venous fistulas. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;7:135–40 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010981 pmid:24463440

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Willinsky RA,
   3. Taylor SM,
   4. TerBrugge K, et al

   . Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003;227:522–28 doi:10.1148/radiol.2272012071 pmid:12637677

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Geibprasert S,
   3. Pongpech S,
   4. Jiarakongmun P, et al

   . Cervical spine dural arteriovenous fistula presenting with congestive myelopathy of the conus. J Neurosurg Spine 2009;11:427–31 doi:10.3171/2009.4.SPINE08118 pmid:19929339

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Saraf-Lavi E,
   3. Bowen BC,
   4. Quencer RM, et al

   . Detection of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae with MR imaging and contrast-enhanced MR angiography: sensitivity, specificity, and prediction of vertebral level. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:858–67 pmid:12006294

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Lim RP,
   3. Shapiro M,
   4. Wang EY, et al

   . 3D time-resolved MR angiography (MRA) of the carotid arteries with time-resolved imaging with stochastic trajectories: comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced bolus-chase MRA and 3D time-of-flight MRA. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1847–54 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1252 pmid:18768727

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Farb RI,
    3. Kim JK,
    4. Willinsky RA, et al

    . Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula localization with a technique of first-pass gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography: initial experience. Radiology 2002;222:843–50 doi:10.1148/radiol.2223010826 pmid:11867811

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Sandhu GS,
    3. Rezaee RP,
    4. Wright K, et al

    . Time-resolved and bolus-chase MR angiography of the leg: branching pattern analysis and identification of septocutaneous perforators. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:858–64 doi:10.2214/AJR.09.3766 pmid:20858810

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Oda S,
    3. Utsunomiya D,
    4. Hirai T, et al

    . Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced 3T MR and 64-row multidetector CT angiography for the localization of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:407–12 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3660 pmid:23907244

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Ali S,
    3. Cashen TA,
    4. Carroll TJ, et al

    . Time-resolved spinal MR angiography: initial clinical experience in the evaluation of spinal arteriovenous shunts. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1806–10 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0639 pmid:17885246

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Amarouche M,
    3. Hart JL,
    4. Siddiqui A, et al

    . Time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography of spinal vascular malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:417–22 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4164 pmid:25395661

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Mull M,
    3. Nijenhuis RJ,
    4. Backes WH, et al

    . Value and limitations of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in spinal arteriovenous malformations and dural arteriovenous fistulas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1249–58 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0612 pmid:17698524

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Lindenholz A,
    3. TerBrugge KG,
    4. van Dijk JMC, et al

    . The accuracy and utility of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for localization of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: the Toronto experience. Eur Radiol 2014;24:2885–94 doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3307-6 pmid:25015136

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Vargas MI,
    3. Nguyen D,
    4. Viallon M, et al

    . Dynamic MR angiography (MRA) of spinal vascular diseases at 3T. Eur Radiol 2010;20:2491–95 doi:10.1007/s00330-010-1815-6 pmid:20473612

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science