Advertisement

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleAdult Brain

Intracranial Arteriovenous Shunting: Detection with Arterial Spin-Labeling and Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging Combined

J. Hodel, X. Leclerc, E. Kalsoum, M. Zuber, R. Tamazyan, M.A. Benadjaoud, J.-P. Pruvo, M. Piotin, H. Baharvahdat, M. Zins and R. Blanc
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2017, 38 (1) 71-76; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4961

References

  1. 1.↵
    2. Hofmeister C,
    3. Stapf C,
    4. Hartmann A, et al
    . Demographic, morphological, and clinical characteristics of 1289 patients with brain arteriovenous malformation. Stroke 2000;31:1307–10 doi:10.1161/01.STR.31.6.1307 pmid:10835449
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    2. Gandhi D,
    3. Chen J,
    4. Pearl M, et al
    . Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: classification, imaging findings, and treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1007–13 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2798 pmid:22241393
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    2. Alexander MD,
    3. Cooke DL,
    4. Nelson J, et al
    . Association between venous angioarchitectural features of sporadic brain arteriovenous malformations and intracranial hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:949–52 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4224 pmid:25634722
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    2. Hadizadeh DR,
    3. von Falkenhausen M,
    4. Gieseke J, et al
    . Cerebral arteriovenous malformation: Spetzler-Martin classification at subsecond-temporal-resolution four-dimensional MR angiography compared with that at DSA. Radiology 2008;246:205–13 doi:10.1148/radiol.2453061684 pmid:17951352
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    2. Taschner CA,
    3. Gieseke J,
    4. Le Thuc V, et al
    . Intracranial arteriovenous malformation: time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography with combination of parallel imaging, keyhole acquisition, and k-space sampling techniques at 1.5 T. Radiology 2008;246:871–79 doi:10.1148/radiol.2463070293 pmid:18195381
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    2. Nishimura S,
    3. Hirai T,
    4. Sasao A, et al
    . Evaluation of dural arteriovenous fistulas with 4D contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:80–85 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1898 pmid:19833802
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    2. Eddleman CS,
    3. Jeong HJ,
    4. Hurley MC, et al
    . 4D radial acquisition contrast-enhanced MR angiography and intracranial arteriovenous malformations: quickly approaching digital subtraction angiography. Stroke 2009;40:2749–53 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.546663 pmid:19478223
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    2. Hodel J,
    3. Blanc R,
    4. Rodallec M, et al
    . Susceptibility-weighted angiography for the detection of high-flow intracranial vascular lesions: preliminary study. Eur Radiol 2013;23:1122–30 doi:10.1007/s00330-012-2690-0 pmid:23111817
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    2. Jagadeesan BD,
    3. Cross DT 3rd.,
    4. Delgado Almandoz JE, et al
    . Susceptibility-weighted imaging: a new tool in the diagnosis and evaluation of abnormalities of the vein of Galen in children. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1747–51 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3058 pmid:22517286
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    2. Jagadeesan BD,
    3. Delgado Almandoz JE,
    4. Moran CJ, et al
    . Accuracy of susceptibility-weighted imaging for the detection of arteriovenous shunting in vascular malformations of the brain. Stroke 2011;42:87–92 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.584862 pmid:21088245
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    2. Letourneau-Guillon L,
    3. Krings T
    . Simultaneous arteriovenous shunting and venous congestion identification in dural arteriovenous fistulas using susceptibility-weighted imaging: initial experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:301–07 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2777 pmid:22051813
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    2. Le TT,
    3. Fischbein NJ,
    4. André JB, et al
    . Identification of venous signal on arterial spin labeling improves diagnosis of dural arteriovenous fistulas and small arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:61–68 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2761 pmid:22158927
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    2. Wolf RL,
    3. Wang J,
    4. Detre JA, et al
    . Arteriovenous shunt visualization in arteriovenous malformations with arterial spin-labeling MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:681–87 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0901 pmid:18397967
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    2. Yu SL,
    3. Wang R,
    4. Wang R, et al
    . Accuracy of vessel-encoded pseudocontinuous arterial spin-labeling in identification of feeding arteries in patients with intracranial arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:65–71 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3638 pmid:23868147
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    2. Nabavizadeh SA,
    3. Edgar JC,
    4. Vossough A
    . Utility of susceptibility-weighted imaging and arterial spin perfusion imaging in pediatric brain arteriovenous shunting. Neuroradiology 2014;56:877–84 doi:10.1007/s00234-014-1408-1 pmid:25063989
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    2. Lüdemann L,
    3. Jedrzejewski G,
    4. Heidenreich J, et al
    . Perfusion imaging of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a study comparing quantitative continuous arterial spin labeling and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T. Magn Reson Imaging 2011;29:1157–64 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2011.07.026 pmid:21920687
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    2. Ramalho J,
    3. Semelka RC,
    4. Ramalho M, et al
    . Gadolinium-based contrast agent accumulation and toxicity: an update. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1192–98 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4615 pmid:26659341
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    2. Adin ME,
    3. Kleinberg L,
    4. Vaidya D, et al
    . Hyperintense dentate nuclei on T1-weighted MRI: relation to repeat gadolinium administration. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1859–65 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4378 pmid:26294649
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    2. Kanda T,
    3. Ishii K,
    4. Kawaguchi H, et al
    . High signal intensity in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images: relationship with increasing cumulative dose of a gadolinium-based contrast material. Radiology 2014;270:834–41 doi:10.1148/radiol.13131669 pmid:24475844
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    2. Cashen TA,
    3. Carr JC,
    4. Shin W, et al
    . Intracranial time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:822–29 pmid:16611772
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    2. Yamamoto M,
    3. Ide M,
    4. Jimbo M, et al
    . Neuroimaging studies of postobliteration nidus changes in cerebral arteriovenous malformations treated by gamma knife radiosurgery. Surg Neurol 1996;45:110–19; discussion 119–22 doi:10.1016/S0090-3019(96)80003-6 pmid:8607060
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    2. Deibler AR,
    3. Pollock JM,
    4. Kraft RA, et al
    . Arterial spin-labeling in routine clinical practice, part 3: hyperperfusion patterns. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1428–35 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1034 pmid:18356466
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article
Cite this article
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Bookmark this article
Intracranial Arteriovenous Shunting: Detection with Arterial Spin-Labeling and Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging Combined
J. Hodel, X. Leclerc, E. Kalsoum, M. Zuber, R. Tamazyan, M.A. Benadjaoud, J.-P. Pruvo, M. Piotin, H. Baharvahdat, M. Zins, R. Blanc
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2017, 38 (1) 71-76; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4961
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Purchase

Jump to section

Advertisement