Wide Variability in Prethrombectomy Workflow Practices in the United States: A Multicenter Survey

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Berkhemer OA,
   3. Fransen PS,
   4. Beumer D, et al

   . A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:11–20 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1411587 pmid:25517348

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Campbell BC,
   3. Mitchell PJ,
   4. Kleinig TJ, et al

   . Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1009–18 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414792 pmid:25671797

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Goyal M,
   3. Demchuk AM,
   4. Menon BK, et al

   . Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1019–30 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414905 pmid:25671798

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Jovin TG,
   3. Chamorro A,
   4. Cobo E, et al

   . Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2296–306 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1503780 pmid:25882510

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Saver JL,
   3. Goyal M,
   4. Bonafe A, et al

   . Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2285–95 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1415061 pmid:25882376

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Fransen PS,
   3. Berkhemer OA,
   4. Lingsma HF, et al

   . Time to reperfusion and treatment effect for acute ischemic stroke: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol 2016;73:190–96 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.3886 pmid:26716735

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Goyal M,
   3. Jadhav AP,
   4. Bonafe A, et al

   . Analysis of workflow and time to treatment and the effects on outcome in endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: results from the SWIFT PRIME randomized controlled trial. Radiology 2016;279:888–97 doi:10.1148/radiol.2016160204 pmid:27092472

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Khatri P,
   3. Yeatts SD,
   4. Mazighi M, et al

   . Time to angiographic reperfusion and clinical outcome after acute ischaemic stroke: an analysis of data from the Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS III) phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:567–74 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70066-3 pmid:24784550

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Mazighi M,
   3. Chaudhry SA,
   4. Ribo M, et al

   . Impact of onset-to-reperfusion time on stroke mortality: a collaborative pooled analysis. Circulation 2013;127:1980–85 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000311 pmid:23671178

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Menon BK,
    3. Sajobi TT,
    4. Zhang Y, et al

    . Analysis of workflow and time to treatment on thrombectomy outcome in the endovascular treatment for small core and proximal occlusion ischemic stroke (ESCAPE) randomized, controlled trial. Circulation 2016;133:2279–86 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019983 pmid:27076599

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Sheth SA,
    3. Jahan R,
    4. Gralla J, et al

    . Time to endovascular reperfusion and degree of disability in acute stroke. Ann Neurol 2015;78:584–93 doi:10.1002/ana.24474 pmid:26153450

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Broderick JP,
    3. Palesch YY,
    4. Demchuk AM, et al

    . Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:893–903 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1214300 pmid:23390923

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Ciccone A,
    3. Valvassori L,
    4. Nichelatti M, et al

    . Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:904–13 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1213701 pmid:23387822

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Kidwell CS,
    3. Jahan R,
    4. Gornbein J, et al

    . A trial of imaging selection and endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:914–23 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1212793 pmid:23394476

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Goyal M,
    3. Almekhlafi M,
    4. Menon B, et al

    . Challenges of acute endovascular stroke trials. Stroke 2014;45:3116–22 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006288 pmid:25169945

    FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Goyal M,
    3. Menon BK,
    4. Hill MD, et al

    . Consistently achieving computed tomography to endovascular recanalization <90 minutes: solutions and innovations. Stroke 2014;45:e252–256 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007366 pmid:25352482

    FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Qureshi AI,
    3. Abd-Allah F,
    4. Aleu A, et al

    . Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke patients: implications and interpretation of IMS III, MR RESCUE, and SYNTHESIS EXPANSION trials: a report from the Working Group of International Congress of Interventional Neurology. J Vasc Interv Neurol 2014;7:56–75 pmid:24920991

    PubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Aghaebrahim A,
    3. Streib C,
    4. Rangaraju S, et al

    . Streamlining door to recanalization processes in endovascular stroke therapy. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:340–45 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012324 pmid:27048957

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Asif KS,
    3. Lazzaro MA,
    4. Zaidat O

    . Identifying delays to mechanical thrombectomy for acute stroke: onset to door and door to clot times. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6:505–10 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010792 pmid:24052495

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Mehta BP,
    3. Leslie-Mazwi TM,
    4. Chandra RV, et al

    . Reducing door-to-puncture times for intra-arterial stroke therapy: a pilot quality improvement project. J Am Heart Assoc 2014;3:e000963 doi:10.1161/JAHA.114.000963 pmid:25389281

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Eesa M,
    3. Menon BK,
    4. Hill MD, et al

    . Achieving faster recanalization times by IA thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: where should we direct our efforts? Interv Neuroradiol 2011;17:228–34 doi:10.1177/159101991101700215 pmid:21696664

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Menon BK,
    3. Almekhlafi MA,
    4. Pereira VM, et al

    . Optimal workflow and process-based performance measures for endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke: analysis of the Solitaire FR thrombectomy for acute revascularization study. Stroke 2014;45:2024–29 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005050 pmid:24876244

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Rai AT,
    3. Smith MS,
    4. Boo S, et al

    . The ‘pit-crew’ model for improving door-to-needle times in endovascular stroke therapy: a Six-Sigma project. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:447–52 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012219 pmid:26863106

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Zerna C,
    3. Assis Z,
    4. d'Esterre CD, et al

    . Imaging, intervention, and workflow in acute ischemic stroke: the Calgary approach. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:978–84 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4610 pmid:26659339

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. van Heerden J,
    3. Yan B,
    4. Churilov L, et al

    . Picture-to-puncture time in acute stroke endovascular intervention: are we getting faster? J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:564–68 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011177 pmid:24968880

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Murad MH,
    4. Rabinstein AA, et al

    . Conscious sedation versus general anesthesia during endovascular acute ischemic stroke treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:525–29 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4159 pmid:25395655

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Jumaa MA,
    3. Zhang F,
    4. Ruiz-Ares G, et al

    . Comparison of safety and clinical and radiographic outcomes in endovascular acute stroke therapy for proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion with intubation and general anesthesia versus the nonintubated state. Stroke 2010;41:1180–84 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.574194 pmid:20431082

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Takahashi C,
    3. Liang CW,
    4. Liebeskind DS, et al

    . To tube or not to tube? The role of intubation during stroke thrombectomy. Front Neurol 2014;5:170 doi:10.3389/fneur.2014.00170 pmid:25295027

    CrossRefPubMed