Treatment of Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms with Flow-Diverter Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Brinjikji W,
   3. Lanzino G,
   4. Cloft HJ, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a systematic review and single-center series. Neurosurgery 2011;68:397–402; discussion 402 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318201d7f4 pmid:21135730

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Pierot L,
   3. Spelle L,
   4. Vitry F, et al

   ; ATENA Investigators. Immediate clinical outcome of patients harboring unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated by endovascular approach: results of the ATENA study. Stroke 2008;39:2497–504 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.512756 pmid:18617659

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Kallmes DF,
   3. Brinjikji W,
   4. Boccardi E, et al

   . Aneurysm Study of Pipeline in an Observational Registry (ASPIRe). Interv Neurol 2016;5:89–99 doi:10.1159/000446503 pmid:27610126

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Rodriguez-Hernandez A,
   3. Sughrue ME,
   4. Akhavan S, et al

   . Current management of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: surgical results with a “clip first” policy. Neurosurgery 2013;72:415–27 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182804aa2 pmid:23208060

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Bhogal P,
   3. AlMatter M,
   4. Bäzner H, et al

   . Flow diversion for the treatment of MCA bifurcation aneurysms: a single centre experience. Front Neurol 2017;8:20 doi:10.3389/fneur.2017.00020 pmid:28210239

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Bhogal P,
   3. Martinez R,
   4. Gansladt O, et al

   . Management of unruptured saccular aneurysms of the M1 segment with flow diversion: a single centre experience. Clin Neuroradiol 2016 Dec 11. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1007/s00062-016-0553-9 pmid:27942770

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Briganti F,
   3. Napoli M,
   4. Leone G, et al

   . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by flow diverter devices: long-term results from a single center. Eur J Radiol 2014;83:1683–90 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.05.029 pmid:24985339

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Caroff J,
   3. Neki H,
   4. Mihalea C, et al

   . Flow-diverter stents for the treatment of saccular middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:279–84 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4540 pmid:26405085

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Iosif C,
   3. Mounayer C,
   4. Yavuz K, et al

   . Middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms treated by extrasaccular flow diverters: midterm angiographic evolution and clinical outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:310–16 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5022 pmid:27979794

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Lin N,
    3. Lanzino G,
    4. Lopes DK, et al

    . Treatment of distal anterior circulation aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device: a US multicenter experience. Neurosurgery 2016;79:14–22 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000001117 pmid:26579967

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Pistocchi S,
    3. Blanc R,
    4. Bartolini B, et al

    . Flow diverters at and beyond the level of the circle of Willis for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2012;43:1032–38 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.636019 pmid:22282890

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Topcuoglu OM,
    3. Akgul E,
    4. Daglioglu E, et al

    . Flow diversion in middle cerebral artery aneurysms: is it really an all-purpose treatment? World Neurosurg 2016;87:317–27 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2015.11.073 pmid:26723288

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Yavuz K,
    3. Geyik S,
    4. Saatci I, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms with flow modification with the use of the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:529–35 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3692 pmid:24072620

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Zanaty M,
    3. Chalouhi N,
    4. Tjoumakaris SI, et al

    . Flow diversion for complex middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Neuroradiology 2014;56:381–87 doi:10.1007/s00234-014-1339-x pmid:24535072

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Moher D,
    3. Liberati A,
    4. Tetzlaff J, et al

    . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2010;8:336–41 doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007 pmid:20171303

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Elsharkawy A,
    3. Lehecka M,
    4. Niemela M, et al

    . A new, more accurate classification of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: computed tomography angiographic study of 1,009 consecutive cases with 1,309 middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2013;73:94–102; discussion 102 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000429842.61213.d5 pmid:23615110

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Wells G,
    3. Shea B,
    4. O'Connell D, et al

    . The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonradomized studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa, Ontario: Ottawal Hospital Research Institute. 2011 http://www.evidencebasedpublichealth.de/download/Newcastle_Ottowa_Scale_Pope_Bruce.pdf. Accessed May 2, 2017.
18. 18.↵
    2. DerSimonian R,
    3. Laird N

    . Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177–88 doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 pmid:3802833

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Higgins JP,
    3. Thompson SG,
    4. Deeks JJ, et al

    . Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557–60 doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 pmid:12958120

    FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Gawlitza M,
    3. Januel AC,
    4. Tall P, et al

    . Flow diversion treatment of complex bifurcation aneurysms beyond the circle of Willis: a single-center series with special emphasis on covered cortical branches and perforating arteries. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:481–87 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011682 pmid:25878068

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Murad MH,
    4. Lanzino G, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:442–47 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.678151 pmid:23321438

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Rouchaud A,
    3. Brinjikji W,
    4. Lanzino G, et al

    . Delayed hemorrhagic complications after flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms: a literature overview. Neuroradiology 2016;58:171–77 doi:10.1007/s00234-015-1615-4 pmid:26553302

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Berge J,
    3. Biondi A,
    4. Machi P, et al

    . Flow-diverter Silk stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 1-year follow-up in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1150–55 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2907 pmid:22300924

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Hanel R,
    4. Lopes D, et al

    . International retrospective study of the Pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:108–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4111 pmid:25355814

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Cloft H,
    4. Cekirge S, et al

    . Lack of association between statin use and angiographic and clinical outcomes after Pipeline embolization for intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:753–58 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5078 pmid:28154128

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Briganti F,
    3. Leone G,
    4. Marseglia M, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms using flow-diverter devices: a systematic review. Neuroradiol J 2015;28:365–75 doi:10.1177/1971400915602803 pmid:26314872

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Cruz JP,
    3. Marotta T,
    4. O'Kelly C, et al

    . Enhancing brain lesions after endovascular treatment of aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1954–58 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3976 pmid:24874528

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Tan LA,
    3. Keigher KM,
    4. Munich SA, et al

    . Thromboembolic complications with Pipeline Embolization Device placement: impact of procedure time, number of stents and pre-procedure P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:217–21 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011111 pmid:24553344

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. Briganti F,
    3. Delehaye L,
    4. Leone G, et al

    . Flow diverter device for the treatment of small middle cerebral artery aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:287–94 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011460 pmid:25603808

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    2. Kim B,
    3. Kim K,
    4. Jeon P, et al

    . Thromboembolic complications in patients with clopidogrel resistance after coil embolization for unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1786–92 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3955 pmid:24831597

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Berg P,
    3. Iosif C,
    4. Ponsonnard S, et al

    . Endothelialization of over- and undersized flow-diverter stents at covered vessel side branches: an in vivo and in silico study. J Biomech 2016;49:4–12 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.10.047 pmid:26607220

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Bartolini B,
    3. Blanc R,
    4. Pistocchi S, et al

    . “Y” and “X” stent-assisted coiling of complex and wide-neck intracranial bifurcation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2153–58 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4060 pmid:25059700

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    2. Hong Y,
    3. Wang YJ,
    4. Deng Z, et al

    . Stent-assisted coiling versus coiling in treatment of intracranial aneurysm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014;9:e82311 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082311 pmid:24454690

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Saleme S,
    3. Iosif C,
    4. Ponomarjova S, et al

    . Flow-diverting stents for intracranial bifurcation aneurysm treatment. Neurosurgery 2014;75:623–31; quiz 631 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000522 pmid:25121791

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Lanzino G,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al

    . Patency of the posterior communicating artery after flow diversion treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014;120:84–88 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.02.018 pmid:24731582

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Daou B,
    3. Valle-Giler EP,
    4. Chalouhi N, et al

    . Patency of the posterior communicating artery following treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device. J Neurosurg 2017;126:564–69 doi:10.3171/2016.2.JNS152544 pmid:27153163

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    2. Vedantam A,
    3. Rao VY,
    4. Shaltoni HM, et al

    . Incidence and clinical implications of carotid branch occlusion following treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 2015;76:173–78; discussion 178 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000595 pmid:25549190

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    2. Rangel-Castilla L,
    3. Munich SA,
    4. Jaleel N, et al

    . Patency of anterior circulation branch vessels after Pipeline embolization: longer-term results from 82 aneurysm cases. J Neurosurg 2017;126:1064–69 doi:10.3171/2016.4.JNS16147 pmid:27285547

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    2. Neki H,
    3. Caroff J,
    4. Jittapiromsak P, et al

    . Patency of the anterior choroidal artery covered with a flow-diverter stent. J Neurosurg 2015;123:1540–45 doi:10.3171/2014.11.JNS141603 pmid:26047410

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    2. Rouchaud A,
    3. Leclerc O,
    4. Benayoun Y, et al

    . Visual outcomes with flow-diverter stents covering the ophthalmic artery for treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:330–36 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4129 pmid:25339649

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
41. 41.↵
    2. Griessenauer CJ,
    3. Ogilvy CS,
    4. Foreman PM, et al

    . Pipeline Embolization Device for small paraophthalmic artery aneurysms with an emphasis on the anatomical relationship of ophthalmic artery origin and aneurysm. J Neurosurg 2016;125:1352–59 doi:10.3171/2015.12.JNS152499 pmid:26943842

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Daou B,
    4. Kung D, et al

    . Fate of the ophthalmic artery after treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device. Neurosurgery 2015;77:581–84; discussion 584 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000887 pmid:26191974

    CrossRefPubMed