Efficacy of Double-Blind Peer Review in an Imaging Subspecialty Journal

E.E. O'Connor; M. Cousar; J.A. Lentini; M. Castillo; K. Halm; T.A. Zeffiro

doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5017

Research Article

Efficacy of Double-Blind Peer Review in an Imaging Subspecialty Journal

E.E. O'Connor, M. Cousar, J.A. Lentini, M. Castillo, K. Halm and T.A. Zeffiro

American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2017, 38 (2) 230-235; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5017

E.E. O'Connor

aFrom the Department of Radiology (E.E.O., M.C., J.A.L.), Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site
ORCID record for E.E. O'Connor

M. Cousar

aFrom the Department of Radiology (E.E.O., M.C., J.A.L.), Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

bDepartment of Radiology (M.C.), University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site
ORCID record for M. Cousar

J.A. Lentini

aFrom the Department of Radiology (E.E.O., M.C., J.A.L.), Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site
ORCID record for J.A. Lentini

M. Castillo

aFrom the Department of Radiology (E.E.O., M.C., J.A.L.), Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site
ORCID record for M. Castillo

K. Halm

cAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology (K.H.), Oak Brook, Illinois

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site
ORCID record for K. Halm

T.A. Zeffiro

dNeurometrika (T.A.Z.), Potomac, Maryland.

Find this author on Google Scholar
Find this author on PubMed
Search for this author on this site
ORCID record for T.A. Zeffiro

Article
Figures & Data
Info & Metrics
Responses
References
PDF

Article Information

vol. 38 no. 2 230-235

DOI

https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5017

PubMed

27856433

Published By

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Print ISSN

0195-6108

Online ISSN

1936-959X

History

Received June 12, 2016
Accepted after revision September 26, 2016
Published online February 13, 2017.

Author Information

E.E. O'Connora,
M. Cousara,b,
J.A. Lentinia,
M. Castilloa,
K. Halmc and
T.A. Zeffirod

^aFrom the Department of Radiology (E.E.O., M.C., J.A.L.), Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
^bDepartment of Radiology (M.C.), University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
^cAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology (K.H.), Oak Brook, Illinois
^dNeurometrika (T.A.Z.), Potomac, Maryland.

Please address correspondence to Erin E. O'Connor, MD, Department of Radiology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, 3401 N Broad St, Philadelphia, PA 19140; e-mail: erin.oconnor{at}umm.edu; @LanternLab

View Full Text

Altmetrics

Cited By...

21 Citations
31 Citations
Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review

Samir Haffar, Fateh Bazerbachi, M. Hassan Murad

Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2019 94 4
Double‐blind peer review affects reviewer ratings and editor decisions at an ecology journal

Charles W. Fox, Jennifer Meyer, Emilie Aimé

Functional Ecology 2023 37 5
Gender Trends in Academic Radiology Publication in the United States Revisited

Erin E. O'Connor, Pauline Chen, Brian Weston, Redmond Anderson, Timothy Zeffiro, Awad Ahmed, Thomas A. Zeffiro

Academic Radiology 2018 25 8
Open versus blind peer review: is anonymity better than transparency?

Natalie Shoham, Alexandra Pitman

BJPsych Advances 2021 27 4
Reglas y consejos para ser un buen revisor por pares de manuscritos científicos

Javier P. Gisbert, María Chaparro

Gastroenterología y Hepatología 2023 46 3
Peer review

Ken Hyland

Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 2020 1 1
Triple-blind review as a solution to gender bias in academic publishing, a theoretical approach

Michael Conklin, Satvir Singh

Studies in Higher Education 2022 47 12
Peer review practices by medical imaging journals

Thomas C. Kwee, Hugo J. A. Adams, Robert M. Kwee

Insights into Imaging 2020 11 1
An overview of the peer review process in biomedical sciences

Edward Miller, Michael James Weightman, Ashna Basu, Andrew Amos, Vlasios Brakoulias

Australasian Psychiatry 2024 32 3
Impact of institutional affiliation bias on editorial publication decisions: A bibliometric analysis of three ophthalmology journals

I. Sverdlichenko, S. Xie, E. Margolin

Ethics, Medicine and Public Health 2022 21
Nudging Science Towards Fairer Evaluations: Evidence From Peer Review

Inna Smirnova, Daniel M. Romero, Misha Teplitskiy

SSRN Electronic Journal 2022
Editorial: Double‐blind review, the ‘Matthew effect’, equality and diversity at ESPL

Stuart Nicholas Lane

Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 2023 48 1
Peer review blinding practices of highly ranked dental journals: analysis and discussion

Clovis Mariano Faggion Jr

British Dental Journal 2021
Inequities in Academic Publishing: Where Is the Evidence and What Can Be Done?

Meredith Loui, Steven C. Fiala

American Journal of Public Health 2024 114 4
Reviewing articles as a way of professional evaluation of scientific texts: organizational and ethical aspects

Svitlana Fiialka, Olga Trishchuk, Nadija Figol

Knowledge and Performance Management 2020 4 1
A Comparison of Plastic Surgery Authorship Trends Under Single Versus Double-Blinded Review

Shyamala Subramanian, Rose S. Maisner, Nikita Patel, Amy Song, Laura Yuan, Dhrumi Mistry, Kailash Kapadia, Edward S. Lee

Journal of Surgical Research 2024 298
A gender gap in the manuscript review time of Turkish national journals?

Lokman Tutuncu, Rahman Dag

Scientometrics 2024 129 12
Lifting the lid on impact and peer review

Joseph Clift, Anne Cooke, Anthony R. Isles, Jeffrey W. Dalley, Richard N. Henson

Brain and Neuroscience Advances 2021 5
Reducing bias in the peer‐review process

Jacqueline L. Frair

The Journal of Wildlife Management 2025 89 4
A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of Publication Bias in the Plastic Surgery Literature

Shannon S. Wu, Leila Katabi, Robert DeSimone, Emily Borsting, Mona Ascha

Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery 2024 153 5
Bridging the gap: promoting equity and diversity in global oncology research within Sub-Saharan Africa

Dang Nguyen, Saloni Patel, Nityanand Jain, Simar S Bajaj, Twalib Ngoma, Wilfred Ngwa

BMJ Oncology 2023 2 1
Dermatoethics

Michael A. Renzi,, Warren R. Heymann

2021
Double Standard or Double Blinded? An Argument for All Peer-Reviewed Scientific Journals

Gaby Moawad, Paul Tyan, Sara Rahman

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2019 26 5
Estimating the Causal Effect of Double-Blind Peer Review for a Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine Journal

Hayley B. Gershengorn, Kelly C. Vranas, Colin R. Cooke, Christopher G. Slatore, Stephanie M. Levine

CHEST 2025
Ethical implications of double-blinding peer review in academic publishing

Ayushya Ajmani, Timothy Klufas, Albert E. Zhou, Brett Sloan, Jane M. Grant-Kels

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2025
Failure to deanonymize information in biomedical academic papers

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

Nurse Author & Editor 2024 34 3
Glass Half Full

J.S. Ross

American Journal of Neuroradiology 2017 38 2
Impact of author characteristics on outcomes of single- versus double-blind peer review: a systematic review of comparative studies in scientific abstracts and publications

Vasiliki P. Giannakakos, Troy S. Karanfilian, Antonios D. Dimopoulos, Anne Barmettler

Scientometrics 2025 130 1
Tips and guidelines for being a good peer reviewer

Javier P. Gisbert, María Chaparro

Gastroenterología y Hepatología (English Edition) 2023 46 3
Types, limitations, and possible alternatives of peer review based on the literature and surgeons’ opinions via Twitter: a narrative review

Sameh Hany Emile, Hytham K. S. Hamid, Semra Demirli Atici, Doga Nur Kosker, Mario Virgilio Papa, Hossam Elfeki, Chee Yang Tan, Alaa El-Hussuna, Steven D. Wexner

Science Editing 2022 9 1
Working against bias: double blind peer review at Journal of Osteopathic Medicine

Ross D. Zafonte, Melissa B. Schmidt

Journal of Osteopathic Medicine 2021 121 5

PreviousNext

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Vol. 38, Issue 2

1 Feb 2017

Table of Contents
Index by author
Complete Issue (PDF)

Download PDF

Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Your Email *

Your Name *

Send To *

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.

You are going to email the following Efficacy of Double-Blind Peer Review in an Imaging Subspecialty Journal

Message Subject (Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology

Message Body (Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.

Your Personal Message

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Cite this article

E.E. O'Connor, M. Cousar, J.A. Lentini, M. Castillo, K. Halm, T.A. Zeffiro

Efficacy of Double-Blind Peer Review in an Imaging Subspecialty Journal

American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2017, 38 (2) 230-235; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5017

Citation Manager Formats

BibTeX
Bookends
EasyBib
EndNote (tagged)
EndNote 8 (xml)
Medlars
Mendeley
Papers
RefWorks Tagged
Ref Manager
RIS
Zotero

0 Responses

Respond to this article

Bookmark this article

User Name *

Password *

Remember my user name & password.

Efficacy of Double-Blind Peer Review in an Imaging Subspecialty Journal

E.E. O'Connor, M. Cousar, J.A. Lentini, M. Castillo, K. Halm, T.A. Zeffiro

American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 2017, 38 (2) 230-235; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5017

Share This Article:

Tweet Widget
Facebook Like
Google Plus One

Purchase

Jump to section

Article
Figures & Data
Info & Metrics
Responses
References
PDF

No related articles found.

PubMed
Google Scholar

Cited By...

Bridging the gap: promoting equity and diversity in global oncology research within Sub-Saharan Africa

Crossref (31)
Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review

Samir Haffar, Fateh Bazerbachi, M. Hassan Murad

Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2019 94 4
Double‐blind peer review affects reviewer ratings and editor decisions at an ecology journal

Charles W. Fox, Jennifer Meyer, Emilie Aimé

Functional Ecology 2023 37 5
Gender Trends in Academic Radiology Publication in the United States Revisited

Erin E. O'Connor, Pauline Chen, Brian Weston, Redmond Anderson, Timothy Zeffiro, Awad Ahmed, Thomas A. Zeffiro

Academic Radiology 2018 25 8
Open versus blind peer review: is anonymity better than transparency?

Natalie Shoham, Alexandra Pitman

BJPsych Advances 2021 27 4
Reglas y consejos para ser un buen revisor por pares de manuscritos científicos

Javier P. Gisbert, María Chaparro

Gastroenterología y Hepatología 2023 46 3
Peer review

Ken Hyland

Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 2020 1 1
Triple-blind review as a solution to gender bias in academic publishing, a theoretical approach

Michael Conklin, Satvir Singh

Studies in Higher Education 2022 47 12
Peer review practices by medical imaging journals

Thomas C. Kwee, Hugo J. A. Adams, Robert M. Kwee

Insights into Imaging 2020 11 1
An overview of the peer review process in biomedical sciences

Edward Miller, Michael James Weightman, Ashna Basu, Andrew Amos, Vlasios Brakoulias

Australasian Psychiatry 2024 32 3
Impact of institutional affiliation bias on editorial publication decisions: A bibliometric analysis of three ophthalmology journals

I. Sverdlichenko, S. Xie, E. Margolin

Ethics, Medicine and Public Health 2022 21

Main menu

User menu

Search

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Efficacy of Double-Blind Peer Review in an Imaging Subspecialty Journal

Article Information

Author Information

Altmetrics

Cited By...

In this issue

Citation Manager Formats

Related Articles

Cited By...

Similar Articles

Indexed Content

Cases

Special Collections

Resources

Multimedia

About Us

American Society of Neuroradiology