Structural Connectivity Analysis in Children with Segmental Callosal Agenesis

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Raybaud C,
   3. Girard N

   . Anatomic MRI study of commissural agenesis and dysplasia of the telencephalon (agenesis of the corpus callosum and related anomalies): clinical correlations and morphogenetic interpretation [in French]. Neurochirurgie 1998;44(suppl 1):38–60 pmid:9757324

   PubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Raybaud C

   . The corpus callosum, the other great forebrain commissures, and the septum pellucidum: anatomy, development, and malformation. Neuroradiology 2010;52:447–77 doi:10.1007/s00234-010-0696-3 pmid:20422408

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Barkovich AJ,
   3. Kjos BO

   . Normal postnatal development of the corpus callosum as demonstrated by MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1988;9:487–91 pmid:3132822

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Lee SK,
   3. Mori S,
   4. Kim DJ, et al

   . Diffusion tensor MR imaging visualizes the altered hemispheric fiber connection in callosal dysgenesis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:25–28 pmid:14729523

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Tovar-Moll F,
   3. Moll J,
   4. de Oliveira-Souza R, et al

   . Neuroplasticity in human callosal dysgenesis: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Cereb Cortex 2007;17:531–41 pmid:16627861

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Wahl M,
   3. Strominger Z,
   4. Jeremy RJ, et al

   . Variability of homotopic and heterotopic callosal connectivity in partial agenesis of the corpus callosum: a 3T diffusion tensor imaging and Q-ball tractography study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:282–89 pmid:19001538

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Sporns O,
   3. Tononi G,
   4. Kötter R

   . The human connectome: a structural description of the human brain. PLoS Comput Biol 2005;1:e42 doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010042 pmid:16201007

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Rubinov M,
   3. Sporns O

   . Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage 2010;52:1059–69 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003 pmid:19819337

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Owen JP,
   3. Li YO,
   4. Ziv E, et al

   . The structural connectome of the human brain in agenesis of the corpus callosum. Neuroimage 2013;70:340–55 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.031 pmid:23268782

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Meoded A,
    3. Katipally R,
    4. Bosemani T, et al

    . Structural connectivity analysis reveals abnormal brain connections in agenesis of the corpus callosum in children. Eur Radiol 2015;25:1471–78 doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3541-y pmid:25477275

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Jakab A,
    3. Kasprian G,
    4. Schwartz E, et al

    . Disrupted developmental organization of the structural connectome in fetuses with corpus callosum agenesis. Neuroimage 2015;111:277–88 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.038 pmid:25725467

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Hagmann P,
    3. Sporns O,
    4. Madan N, et al

    . White matter maturation reshapes structural connectivity in the late developing human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:19067–72 doi:10.1073/pnas.1009073107 pmid:20956328

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Tournier JD,
    3. Calamante F,
    4. Gadian DG, et al

    . Direct estimation of the fiber orientation density function from diffusion-weighted MRI data using spherical deconvolution. Neuroimage 2004;23:1176–85 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.037 pmid:15528117

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Smith RE,
    3. Tournier JD,
    4. Calamante F, et al

    . Anatomically-constrained tractography: improved diffusion MRI streamlines tractography through effective use of anatomical information. Neuroimage 2012;62:1924–38 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.005 pmid:22705374

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Smith RE,
    3. Tournier JD,
    4. Calamante F, et al

    . SIFT: spherical-deconvolution informed filtering of tractograms. Neuroimage 2013;67:298–312 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.049 pmid:23238430

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Fischl B,
    3. Salat DH,
    4. van der Kouwe AJ, et al

    . Sequence-independent segmentation of magnetic resonance images. Neuroimage 2004;23:S69–84 pmid:15501102

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Hubert LJ,
    3. Baker FB

    . Comparisons and fitting of given classification schemes. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1977;16:233–53 doi:10.1016/0022-2496(77)90054-2

    CrossRef
18. 18.↵
    2. Zalesky A,
    3. Fornito A,
    4. Bullmore ET

    . Network-based statistic: identifying differences in brain networks. Neuroimage 2010;53:1197–207 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.041 pmid:20600983

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Edwards TJ,
    3. Sherr EH,
    4. Barkovich AJ, et al

    . Clinical, genetic and imaging findings identify new causes for corpus callosum development syndromes. Brain 2014;137:1579–613 doi:10.1093/brain/awt358 pmid:24477430

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Rakic P,
    3. Yakovlev PI

    . Development of the corpus callosum and cavum septi in man. J Comp Neurol 1968;132:45–72 doi:10.1002/cne.901320103 pmid:5293999

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Lindwall C,
    3. Fothergill T,
    4. Richards L

    . Commissure formation in the mammalian forebrain. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2007;17:3–14 doi:10.1016/j.conb.2007.01.008 pmid:17275286

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Richards LJ,
    3. Plachez C,
    4. Ren T

    . Mechanisms regulating the development of the corpus callosum and its agenesis in mouse and human. Clin Genet 2004;66:276–89 doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.2004.00354.x pmid:15355427

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Rash BG,
    3. Richards LJ

    . A role for cingulate pioneering axons in the development of the corpus callosum. J Comp Neurol 2001;434:147–57 doi:10.1002/cne.1170 pmid:11331522

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Livy DJ,
    3. Wahlsten D

    . Retarded formation of the hippocampal commissure in embryos from mouse strains lacking a corpus callosum. Hippocampus 1997;7:2–14 pmid:9138666

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Paul LK,
    3. Brown WS,
    4. Adolphs R, et al

    . Agenesis of the corpus callosum: genetic, developmental and functional aspects of connectivity. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007;8:287–99 doi:10.1038/nrn2107 pmid:17375041

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Tovar-Moll F,
    3. Monteiro M,
    4. Andrade J, et al

    . Structural and functional brain rewiring clarifies preserved interhemispheric transfer in humans born without the corpus callosum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014;111:7843–48 doi:10.1073/pnas.1400806111 pmid:24821757

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Hagmann P,
    3. Cammoun L,
    4. Gigandet X, et al

    . Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex. PLoS Biol 2008;6:e159 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060159 pmid:18597554

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Tournier JD,
    3. Calamante F,
    4. Connelly A

    . Determination of the appropriate b-value and number of gradient directions for high-angular-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging. NMR Biomed 2013;26:1775–86 doi:10.1002/nbm.3017 pmid:24038308

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Fiori S,
    3. Poretti A,
    4. Pannek K, et al

    . Diffusion tractography biomarkers of pediatric cerebellar hypoplasia/atrophy: preliminary results using constrained spherical deconvolution. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:917–23 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4607 pmid:26659337

    Abstract/FREE Full Text