Feasibility of Flat Panel Detector CT in Perfusion Assessment of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: Initial Clinical Experience

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Taylor CL,
   3. Selman WR,
   4. Ratcheson RA

   . Steal affecting the central nervous system. Neurosurgery 2002;50:679–88; discussion 688–89 doi:10.1097/00006123-200204000-00002 pmid:11904017

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Van Roost D,
   3. Schramm J

   . What factors are related to impairment of cerebrovascular reserve before and after arteriovenous malformation resection? A cerebral blood flow study using xenon-enhanced computed tomography. Neurosurgery 2001;48:709–16; discussion 716–17 pmid:11322430

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Young WL,
   3. Pile-Spellman J,
   4. Prohovnik I, et al

   . Evidence for adaptive autoregulatory displacement in hypotensive cortical territories adjacent to arteriovenous malformations: Columbia University AVM Study Project. Neurosurgery 1994;34:601–10; discussion 610–11 doi:10.1227/00006123-199404000-00006 pmid:8008157

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Kim DJ,
   3. Krings T

   . Whole-brain perfusion CT patterns of brain arteriovenous malformations: a pilot study in 18 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:2061–66 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2659 pmid:21885720

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Fink GR

   . Effects of cerebral angiomas on perifocal and remote tissue: a multivariate positron emission tomography study. Stroke 1992;23:1099–105 doi:10.1161/01.STR.23.8.1099 pmid:1636185

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Tyler JL,
   3. Leblanc R,
   4. Meyer E, et al

   . Hemodynamic and metabolic effects of cerebral arteriovenous malformations studied by positron emission tomography. Stroke 1989;20:890–98 doi:10.1161/01.STR.20.7.890 pmid:2787547

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Ueda M,
   3. Kamiya T,
   4. Sakamoto S, et al

   . Abnormally distributed regional cerebral blood flow in brain malformations detected by single photon emission computed tomography [in Japanese]. Rinsho Shinkeigaku 1997;37:99–105 pmid:9164139

   PubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Guo WY,
   3. Wu YT,
   4. Wu HM, et al

   . Toward normal perfusion after radiosurgery: perfusion MR imaging with independent component analysis of brain arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1636–44 pmid:15569724

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Fiehler J,
   3. Illies T,
   4. Piening M, et al

   . Territorial and microvascular perfusion impairment in brain arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:356–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1351 pmid:19001537

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Wolf RL,
    3. Wang J,
    4. Detre JA, et al

    . Arteriovenous shunt visualization in arteriovenous malformations with arterial spin-labeling MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:681–87 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0901 pmid:18397967

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Kamran M,
    3. Nagaraja S,
    4. Byrne JV

    . C-arm flat detector computed tomography: the technique and its application in interventional neuro-radiology. Neuroradiology 2010;52:319–27 doi:10.1007/s00234-009-0609-5 pmid:19859702

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Mordasini P,
    3. El-Koussy M,
    4. Brekenfeld C, et al

    . Applicability of tableside flat panel detector CT parenchymal cerebral blood volume measurement in neurovascular interventions: preliminary clinical experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:154–58 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2715 pmid:21960501

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Struffert T,
    3. Deuerling-Zheng Y,
    4. Kloska S, et al

    . Cerebral blood volume imaging by flat detector computed tomography in comparison to conventional multislice perfusion CT. Eur Radiol 2011;21:882–89 doi:10.1007/s00330-010-1957-6 pmid:20857117

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Struffert T,
    3. Deuerling-Zheng Y,
    4. Engelhorn T, et al

    . Feasibility of cerebral blood volume mapping by flat panel detector CT in the angiography suite: first experience in patients with acute middle cerebral artery occlusions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:618–25 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2839 pmid:22207301

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Blanc R,
    3. Pistocchi S,
    4. Babic D, et al

    . Intravenous flat-detector CT angiography in acute ischemic stroke management. Neuroradiology 2012;54:383–91 doi:10.1007/s00234-011-0893-8 pmid:21625990

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Fiorella D,
    3. Turk A,
    4. Chaudry I, et al

    . A prospective, multicenter pilot study investigating the utility of flat detector derived parenchymal blood volume maps to estimate cerebral blood volume in stroke patients. J Neurointerv Surg 2014;6:451–56 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010840 pmid:23943817

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Kamran M,
    3. Downer J,
    4. Corkill R, et al

    . Non-invasive assessment of vasospasm following aneurysmal SAH using C-arm FDCT parenchymal blood volume measurement in the neuro-interventional suite: technical feasibility. Interv Neuroradiol 2015;21:479–89 doi:10.1177/1591019915582376 pmid:26017197

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Kamran M,
    3. Byrne JV

    . C-arm flat detector computed tomography parenchymal blood volume imaging: the nature of parenchymal blood volume parameter and the feasibility of parenchymal blood volume imaging in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage patients. Neuradiology 2015;57:937–49 doi:10.1007/s00234-015-1545-1 pmid:26022353

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Okell TW,
    3. Chappell MA,
    4. Kelly ME, et al

    . Cerebral blood flow quantification using vessel-encoded arterial spin labeling. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2013;33:1716–24 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2013.129 pmid:23921895

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Wong EC

    . Vessel-encoded arterial spin-labeling using pseudocontinuous tagging. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:1086–91 doi:10.1002/mrm.21293 pmid:17969084

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Chappell MA,
    3. Okell TW,
    4. Jezzard P, et al

    . Vascular territory image analysis using vessel encoded arterial spin labeling. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2009;12(pt 2):514–21 pmid:20426151

    PubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Chappell MA,
    3. Okell TW,
    4. Payne SJ, et al

    . A fast analysis method for non-invasive imaging of blood flow in individual cerebral arteries using vessel-encoded arterial spin labelling angiography. Med Image Anal 2012;16:831–39 doi:10.1016/j.media.2011.12.004 pmid:22322066

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Sharma M,
    3. Fox AJ,
    4. Symons S, et al

    . CT angiographic source images: flow- or volume-weighted? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:359–64 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2282 pmid:21051518

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Dorn F,
    3. Liebig T,
    4. Muenzel D, et al

    . Order of CT stroke protocol (CTA before or after CTP): impact on image quality. Neuroradiology 2012;54:105–12 doi:10.1007/s00234-011-0840-8 pmid:21344216

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Fierstra J,
    3. Spieth S,
    4. Tran L, et al

    . Severely impaired cerebrovascular reserve in patients with cerebral proliferative angiopathy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2011;8:310–15 doi:10.3171/2011.6.PEDS1170 pmid:21882924

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Kloska SP

    . CT angiography source images with modern multisection CT scanners: attention to technical principles is crucial. Cerebrovasc Dis 2011;32:94 doi:10.1159/000327042 pmid:21709405

    CrossRefPubMed