Detection of Focal Longitudinal Changes in the Brain by Subtraction of MR Images

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Longstreth WT Jr.,
   3. Arnold AM,
   4. Kuller LH, et al

   . Progression of magnetic resonance imaging-defined brain vascular disease predicts vascular events in elderly: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Stroke 2011;42:2970–72 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.622977 pmid:21817135

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Rovira A,
   3. Auger C,
   4. Alonso J

   . Magnetic resonance monitoring of lesion evolution in multiple sclerosis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2013;6:298–310 doi:10.1177/1756285613484079 pmid:23997815

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Alpert NM,
   3. Berdichevsky D,
   4. Levin Z, et al

   . Performance evaluation of an automated system for registration and postprocessing of CT scans. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001;25:747–52 doi:10.1097/00004728-200109000-00013 pmid:11584235

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Castellino RA

   . Computer aided detection (CAD): an overview. 2005;23;5:17–19 pmid:16154813
5. 5.↵
   2. Vovk U,
   3. Pernus F,
   4. Likar B

   . A review of methods for correction of intensity inhomogeneity in MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2007;26:405–21 doi:10.1109/TMI.2006.891486 pmid:17354645

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Roemer PB,
   3. Edelstein WA,
   4. Hayes CE, et al

   . The NMR phased array. Magn Reson Med 1990;16:192–225 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910160203 pmid:2266841

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Vemuri P,
   3. Kholmovski EG,
   4. Parker DL, et al

   . Coil sensitivity estimation for optimal SNR reconstruction and intensity inhomogeneity correction in phased array MR imaging. Inf Process Med Imaging 2005;19:603–14 pmid:17354729

   PubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Wicks DA,
   3. Barker GJ,
   4. Tofts PS

   . Correction of intensity nonuniformity in MR images of any orientation. Magn Reson Imaging 1993;11:183–96 doi:10.1016/0730-725X(93)90023-7 pmid:8455430

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Sled JG,
   3. Zijdenbos AP,
   4. Evans AC

   . A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998;17:87–97 doi:10.1109/42.668698 pmid:9617910

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Patel N,
    3. Horsfield MA,
    4. Banahan C, et al

    . Impact of perioperative infarcts after cardiac surgery. Stroke 2015;46:680–86 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007533 pmid:25649804

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Horsfield MA,
    3. Rocca MA,
    4. Pagani E, et al

    . Estimating brain lesion volume change in multiple sclerosis by subtraction of magnetic resonance images. J Neuroimaging 2016;26:395–402 doi:10.1111/jon.12344 pmid:27019077

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Taoka T,
    3. Iwasaki S,
    4. Nakagawa H, et al

    . Fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FAST-FLAIR) of ischemic lesions in the brain: comparison with T2-weighted turbo SE. Radiat Med 1996;14:127–31 pmid:8827806

    PubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Bosc M,
    3. Heitz F,
    4. Armspach JP, et al

    . Automatic change detection in multimodal serial MRI: application to multiple sclerosis lesion evolution. Neuroimage 2003;20:643–56 doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00406-3 pmid:14568441

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Meier DS,
    3. Guttmann CR

    . Time-series analysis of MRI intensity patterns in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 2003;20:1193–209 doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00354-9 pmid:14568488

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Tan IL,
    3. van Schijndel RA,
    4. Fazekas F, et al

    . Image registration and subtraction to detect active T(2) lesions in MS: an interobserver study. J Neurol 2002;249:767–73 doi:10.1007/s00415-002-0712-6 pmid:12111312

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Duan Y,
    3. Hildenbrand PG,
    4. Sampat MP, et al

    . Segmentation of subtraction images for the measurement of lesion change in multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:340–46 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0795 pmid:18272569

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Ganiler O,
    3. Oliver A,
    4. Diez Y, et al

    . A subtraction pipeline for automatic detection of new appearing multiple sclerosis lesions in longitudinal studies. Neuroradiology 2014;56:363–74 doi:10.1007/s00234-014-1343-1 pmid:24590302

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Battaglini M,
    3. Rossi F,
    4. Grove RA, et al

    . Automated identification of brain new lesions in multiple sclerosis using subtraction images. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;39:1543–49 doi:10.1002/jmri.24293 pmid:24987754

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Fazekas F,
    3. Soelberg-Sorensen P,
    4. Comi G, et al

    . MRI to monitor treatment efficacy in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging 2007;17(suppl 1):50S–55S doi:10.1111/j.1552-6569.2007.00138.x pmid:17425736

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Sotiras A,
    3. Davatzikos C,
    4. Paragios N

    . Deformable medical image registration: a survey. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2013;32:1153–90 doi:10.1109/TMI.2013.2265603 pmid:23739795

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Mazziotta J,
    3. Toga A,
    4. Evans A, et al

    . A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2001;356:1293–322 doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.0915 pmid:11545704

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Xing W,
    3. Nan C,
    4. Zuo Z, et al

    . Probabilistic MRI brain anatomical atlases based on 1,000 Chinese subjects. PLoS One 2013;8:e50939 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050939 pmid:23341878

    CrossRefPubMed