Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Research ArticleHEAD & NECK
Open Access

MR Imaging Grading System for Skull Base Chordoma

K. Tian, L. Wang, J. Ma, K. Wang, D. Li, J. Du, G. Jia, Z. Wu and J. Zhang
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2017, 38 (6) 1206-1211; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5152
K. Tian
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
bChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing, China
cCenter of Brain Tumor (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China
dBeijing Key Laboratory of Brian Tumor (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for K. Tian
L. Wang
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
bChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing, China
cCenter of Brain Tumor (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China
dBeijing Key Laboratory of Brian Tumor (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for L. Wang
J. Ma
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
bChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing, China
cCenter of Brain Tumor (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China
dBeijing Key Laboratory of Brian Tumor (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Ma
K. Wang
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
bChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing, China
cCenter of Brain Tumor (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China
dBeijing Key Laboratory of Brian Tumor (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for K. Wang
D. Li
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
bChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing, China
cCenter of Brain Tumor (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China
dBeijing Key Laboratory of Brian Tumor (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D. Li
J. Du
eDepartment of Neuropathology (J.D), Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
fChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (J.D.), Center of Brain Tumor, Beijing, China
gInstitute for Brain Disorders (J.D.), Beijing Key Laboratory of Brain Tumor, Beijing, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Du
G. Jia
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
bChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing, China
cCenter of Brain Tumor (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China
dBeijing Key Laboratory of Brian Tumor (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for G. Jia
Z. Wu
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
bChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing, China
cCenter of Brain Tumor (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China
dBeijing Key Laboratory of Brian Tumor (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Z. Wu
J. Zhang
aFrom the Department of Neurosurgery (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
bChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing, China
cCenter of Brain Tumor (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Beijing, China
dBeijing Key Laboratory of Brian Tumor (K.T., L.W., J.M., K.W., D.L., G.J., Z.W., J.Z.), Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Zhang
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Skull base chordoma has been widely studied in recent years, however, imaging characteristics of this tumor have not been well elaborated. The purpose of this study was to establish an MR imaging grading system for skull base chordoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 156 patients with skull base chordomas were retrospectively assessed. Tumor-to-pons signal intensity ratios were calculated from pretreatment MR images RT1 (ratio of tumor to pons signal intensity in T1 FLAIR sequence), RT2 (ratio of tumor to pons signal intensity in T2 sequence) and REN (ratio of tumor to pons signal intensity in enhanced T1 FLAIR sequence), and significant ratios for overall survival and progression-free survival were selected to establish a grading system. Clinical variables among different MR imaging grades were then analyzed to evaluate the usefulness of the grading system.

RESULTS: RT2 (P < .001) and REN (P = .04) were identified as significant variables affecting progression-free survival. After analysis, the classification criteria were set as follows: MR grade I, RT2 > 2.49 and REN ≤ 0.77; MR grade II, RT2 > 2.49 and REN > 0.77, or RT2 ≤ 2.49 and REN ≤ 0.77; and MR grade III, RT2 ≤ 2.49 and REN > 0.77. MR grade III tumors had a more abundant tumor blood supply than MR grade I tumors (P < .001), and the intraoperative blood loss of MR grade III tumors was higher than that of MR grade I tumors (P = .002). Additionally, skull base chordoma progression risk increased by 2.071 times for every single MR grade increase (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS: A higher RT2 value was a negative indicator of tumor progression, whereas a higher REN value was a positive risk factor of tumor progression. MR grade III tumors showed a more abundant blood supply than MR grade I tumors, and the risk of skull base chordoma progression increased with every single MR grade increase.

ABBREVIATIONS:

OS
overall survival
PFS
progression-free survival
SBC
skull base chordoma
SI
signal intensity

Chordoma is a malignant tumor that originates from notochord remnants, and this tumor often exhibits mild-to-moderate enhancement. It comprises 1.8%–4.3% of bone tumors and 3.9%–6.1% of malignant bone tumors,1⇓–3 and it shows a marked predilection for the axial skeleton. Chordoma primarily occurs in the skull base (32%–42%) and sacrococcygeal region (29.2%).4,5 The prevalence of chordomas is 0.08–0.089 per 100,000, and males (0.01–0.016 per 100,000) have a higher incidence than females (0.06–0.066 per 100,000).4⇓–6 Chordoma is locally aggressive and may destroy surrounding bone. Skull base chordoma (SBC) often involves vital blood vessels, cranial nerves, and other important structures. Extensive resection of a skull base chordoma is difficult and may result in severe complications.7 Chemotherapy usually has a minimal effect on chordomas, and the current best treatment is radical resection plus postoperative radiation therapy.8,9 The median survival for patients with SBC is 151 months.10 In recent years, new technologies such as endoscopy, intraoperative navigation, and electrophysiologic monitoring have facilitated more radical resections.11 Although the proton beam, carbon ion, modulated and stereotactic techniques were applied in radiation therapy, the progression and mortality rates of skull base chordoma are still very high.11⇓⇓–14

The diagnosis and classification of chordoma primarily depend on histopathologic evaluation and preoperative imaging data. Chordoma has 3 histologic types: conventional, chondroid, and dedifferentiated.15 Conventional chordoma is the most common type, and patients with chondroid chordoma are reported to have the best prognoses.8 Chordoma often shows low density and bone destruction on CT.16 MR imaging is superior in detecting the tumor and delineating its extent.17 Chordomas have a highly heterogeneous appearance on MR imaging, demonstrating hypo- to isointensity on T1 sequences and moderate-to-very-high intensity on T2 sequences. The tumor may exhibit minimal-to-moderate enhancement on enhanced T1 sequences (Fig 1). The clinical significance of this MR imaging heterogeneity has not been discussed in the literature, to our knowledge.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

MR imaging of 2 patients with SBC. Patient 1 (A–C), 21-years of age. Pathologic findings were conventional chordoma. The patient underwent subtotal tumor resection with no progression at 48 months. A, Axial T2-weighted MR imaging. Tumor demonstrates homogeneous high signal intensity. B, Axial T1 FLAIR-weighted MR imaging. Tumor has relatively homogeneous hypointense signal compared with the pons. C, Enhanced T1 FLAIR MR imaging shows no enhancement of the lesion. Patient 2 (D–F), 25 years of age. Pathologic findings revealed conventional chordoma with necrosis and nuclear division. This patient underwent subtotal tumor resection with tumor progression at 8 months. D, Axial T2-weighted MR imaging demonstrates tumor heterogeneity. The signal intensity is relatively lower than that in patient 1. E, Axial T1 FLAIR MR imaging. The tumor is heterogeneous and hyperintense compared with the pons. F, Enhanced T1 FLAIR MR imaging. Tumor exhibits moderate enhancement.

We thought that the clinical features and prognosis of SBCs were associated with the characteristics on MR imaging (Figs 1 and 2). The purpose of this study was to explore the value of MR signal intensity (SI) in establishing a grading system for SBC.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Kaplan-Meier analysis illustrating survival (left) and progression-free survival (right) for different MR imaging grades. There were no differences in overall survival among the 3 MR grade groups (log-rank = 1.669, P = .43). Progression-free survival was different among the 3 MR grades (log-rank = 25.889, P < .001), with grade III tumors being associated with shorter progression-free survival than grade I (log-rank = 18.561, P < .001) and grade II (log-rank = 12.668, P < .001) tumors.

Materials and Methods

Overview

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, and informed consent was acquired from all patients. There were no financial conflicts of interest associated with this project. The method used in this study was similar to that in the study of Tian et al.14 All MR imaging data used in this study were acquired before any treatment, and all the enrolled patients underwent an operation in our hospital.

Patients

In this study, 242 patients underwent an operation for SBC from February 2005 to December 2014 in the skull base ward of our hospital. We developed inclusion and exclusion criteria as follows: The inclusion criteria were the following: 1) All patients had their primary operation at our institute, 2) no prior treatment (eg, biopsy, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy) had been attempted, and 3) there was availability of MR images before the operation (including T1 FLAIR, T2, and enhanced T1 FLAIR sequences). The exclusion criteria were lack of a complete MR imaging examination before treatment and the presence of other significant diseases that might affect survival.

Clinical Analysis

Demographic information for patients was obtained from medical records. The data included surgical approaches, tumor blood supply, tumor consistency, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative radiation therapy. The tumor blood supply was classified as either abundant or poor. Tumor consistency was recorded as either soft or hard (the latter included heterogeneous tumors with both soft and hard components). We followed patients in clinics or by telephone. Patients who were lost to follow-up were not included in the subsequent regression analyses. Tumor progression stands for tumor growth after operation.

Histopathologic Analysis

All histologic specimens were examined by 2 experienced pathologists with >10 years' experience in chordoma analysis. According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, the lesions include conventional, chondroid, and dedifferentiated types.15 No dedifferentiated chordomas were found; thus, the group included only conventional and chondroid chordomas.

MR Imaging Protocol

MR imaging examinations were performed by using a 3T Magnetom Tim Trio scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). T1 FLAIR, T2, and enhanced T1 FLAIR sequences were included in each patient's images. The TR/TE range was 1850–2500/9.4–19.8 ms for the T1 FLAIR sequence and 4500–6000/84–97 ms for the T2 sequence. Gadopentetate dimeglumine was injected at a concentration of 0.2 mL/kg (0.5 mol/L). Scanning was performed 2 minutes after the injection. The TR/TE ranges for the enhanced T1 FLAIR sequence were 1850–2500/9.4–19.8 ms. All MR imaging data were analyzed in the PACS.

MR Imaging Analysis

All MR imaging data were evaluated by 2 radiologists. MR image quality was evaluated first. For diagnosis, all tumor images were free of significant artifacts. The maximum diameters of the tumors in 3 perpendicular dimensions were measured, and the largest value was recorded as the “largest diameter.” Categories were defined as follows: morphology, with and without lobulation; location, occipitocervical and other types; and resection degree, aggressive (>90%) and nonaggressive (≤90%) resection.

Finally, tumor SI was measured in the PACS. Because image noise and other conditions might affect the SI in MR images, normalization was performed by selecting an area as a control. The pons was selected as our control. The SI of a small region in the pons was measured in each patient, and SI values of T1 FLAIR, T2, and enhanced T1 FLAIR sequences were obtained separately. The average tumor SI (STT1 FLAIR, STT2, and SItumor enhance [STEN]) and the pons SI (SPT1 FLAIR, SPT2, SIpons enhance [SPEN]) was calculated. Average SI ratios of tumor to pons (RT1 FLAIR, RT2, Ratioenhance [REN]) were then calculated, and RT1 FLAIR, RT2 and REN were used as the SI ratios of the tumor to the pons in the T1 FLAIR, T2, and enhanced T1 FLAIR sequences, respectively. We used the following formulas:

  • RT1 FLAIR = STT1 FLAIR/SPT1 FLAIR

  • RT2 = STT2/SPT2

  • REN = STEN/SPEN.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS software (SPSS Statistics 20.0; IBM, Armonk, New York). The effects of RT1 FLAIR, RT2, and REN on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed with the Cox model. Significant variables were then selected to establish the SBC MR imaging grading system. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to set cutoff values.

Rank sum and t tests were used in the analysis of the distributions of continuous variables among different MR imaging subgroups. A χ2 test was used in analyzing the distributions of categoric variables among different MR imaging subtypes. The Kaplan-Meier test was used in assessing OS and PFS among different MR imaging groups. In the OS and PFS analysis, all factors were first included in univariate analysis separately; then, multivariate analysis was conducted with the inclusion criterion of 0.1. A P value < .05 indicated statistical significance.

Results

Of the 242 patients with SBC, 183 individuals underwent a primary operation. For 21 of these patients, pretreatment MR images were not available. For the remaining 162 patients, enhanced T1 FLAIR sequences were not available for 3 patients, and the MR images of another 3 patients were unobtainable for review. Therefore, 156 patients were included in the final analysis.

There were 63 females and 93 males (1:1.5), and the patients' ages ranged from 5 to 67 years (median, 38 ± 14.6 years). No significant differences in age were found between sexes (P = .18). The median follow-up time was 42 months (range, 3–122 months); 3 patients were lost to follow-up, and 17 patients died (mortality rate of 11.1%). One died of a brain stem ischemic infarction, 2 died of tumor apoplexy, and the remaining 14 died from complications caused by tumor recurrence. Sixty-five (42.5%) patients experienced tumor progression. Other variables are listed in Tables 1 and 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Continuous variables for patients with SBCa

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Categoric variables for patients with SBCa

Univariate Cox regression analysis indicated that decreased RT2 (hazard ratio = 0.332; 95% CI, 0.201–0.548; P < .001) and increased REN (hazard ratio = 1.836; 95% CI, 1.032–3.264; P = .04) were significant adverse variables for PFS. Therefore, RT2 and REN values were included in the MR imaging classification. According to receiver operating characteristic analysis, the cutoff value for RT2 was 2.49, and it was 0.77 for REN. The following classification grades were established: MR grade I, RT2 > 2.49 and REN ≤ 0.77; MR grade II, RT2 > 2.49 and REN > 0.77, or RT2 ≤ 2.49 and REN ≤ 0.77; and MR grade III, RT2 ≤ 2.49 and REN > 0.77.

Analysis of the distributions of SBC characteristics among the different MR grades showed that MR grade III tumors had more abundant blood supply than MR grade I tumors (P < .001), as well as greater intraoperative blood loss (800 versus 500 mL, P = .002). The distribution of SBC pathologic types among the different MR grades was not significantly different (P = .56) (Table 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3:

The distributions of variables of patients with SBC in different MR imaging grades

Kaplan-Meier analysis of OS showed no significant differences among the different MR grades (Fig 2, left). However, in Kaplan-Meier analysis of tumor progression, MR grade III tumors were associated with shorter PFS than MR grade I (P < .001) and MR grade II tumors (P < .001) (Fig 2, right). Univariate analysis revealed that tumor blood supply, resection grade, tumor consistency, histopathology, tumor location, surgical approaches, and MR grades were potentially significant risk factors for tumor progression (P < .001). After including the above variables in multivariate analysis, tumor blood supply, resection grade, tumor consistency, histopathology, and MR grade were independent variables for PFS and the risk of SBC progression increased by 2.071 times for every single MR grade increase (95% CI: 1.376–3.118, P < .001) (Fig 3).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models for tumor progression risk. The black dots indicate odds ratio, and the horizontal line represents 95% confidence intervals. N indicates no; Y, yes; OC, occipitocervical; CO, conventional; CH, chondroid; HR, hazard ratio.

Discussion

In this retrospective study, the MR SI of patients with SBC was incorporated into statistical analyses, and SBCs were classified into 3 MR grades according to RT2 and REN values. It was found that MR grade III tumors had more abundant blood supply than MR grade I tumors. Furthermore, the risk of SBC progression increased by 2.071 times for every single MR grade increase in the MR classification system.

MR imaging is useful not only for diagnosing disease but also in predicting prognosis and tumor classification. The MR SI and SI ratio of a lesion have been considered important indicators in many studies.18⇓⇓–21 However, chordomas show substantial heterogeneity on MR images, and MR imaging has previously been used only to aid in the diagnosis of SBC. No previous studies have reported the relationships between MR imaging features and SBC outcomes.

In the present study, tumor and pons signal intensities were measured in the PACS with a straightforward measurement process that ensures the acquisition of accurate data.22 We calculated RT1 FLAIR, RT2, and REN values to represent the tumor SI in each sequence while eliminating confounding factors caused by MR imaging conditions among different patients. Although there was no evidence that the MR signal ratio is a risk factor for mortality in statistical analysis, our results showed that a higher RT2 value predicted diminished tumor progression and that a higher REN value predicted more rapid tumor progression. We therefore established MR grades on the basis of these values. Multivariate analysis of tumor progression indicated that MR grade was a significant risk factor and that the risk of SBC progression increased as the MR grade increased.

Chordomas can be classified into conventional, chondroid, and dedifferentiated types based on histopathologic manifestations. Conventional chordoma is the most common type, and chondroid and dedifferentiated chordomas exhibit the most favorable and worst outcomes, respectively.9,23,24 Our results are consistent with those in previous reports. Although pathologic confirmation is the criterion standard for the diagnosis of SBC and pathologic type is an independent variable in the PFS analysis, the MR grading method for SBC was more useful for predicting the prognosis of patients with SBC. This usefulness derived from the following: First, there was a relatively uniform distribution of the 3 MR grades of SBC; second, the MR grade can be immediately determined after an initial MR imaging examination, which is far earlier than a pathologic diagnosis; and third, the grading process is simple because the measurement of SI and the following calculation are both straightforward. This feature makes this technique more accessible to neurosurgeons and radiologists.

Prior studies have discussed the association between MR SI and lesion blood supply.25 They found that tumors with an abundant blood supply have lower RT2 values. We produced similar results in the present study, showing that MR grade III tumors (low RT2 and high REN) had a more abundant blood supply than MR grade I tumors (high RT2 and low REN) and that the former are associated with greater intraoperative blood loss than the latter. This finding is useful for preoperative evaluations of tumor blood supply and is of great significance for clinical practice. Prior knowledge of this factor may alter therapy, such as in preparing adequate quantities of blood, altering a planned operative approach, and in anticipating other measures for potentially significant hemorrhage.

In the present study, chondroid SBCs were associated with a longer PFS than conventional SBCs, and this finding is consistent with those in prior studies. However, SBC pathologic type is not significantly associated with MR grade. Indeed, MR SI did not differ between chondroid and conventional SBCs, and no other studies have reported differences in MR imaging features between different SBC pathologic types. This finding may be because differences in histopathologic levels are not necessarily reflected in imaging modalities. These results need to be confirmed in additional studies.

We enrolled 156 patients with primary SBC in this study, and to the best of our knowledge, this represents the largest primary SBC single-center study. The single-center source avoided the heterogeneity occasionally encountered in multicenter studies. Additionally, we demonstrated the utility of MR SI ratios for SBC grading and confirmed the validity of our MR grading system. We also have demonstrated that the simple ratio of the tumor to the pons allows easy determination of SBC MR grade. This grading system can be widely used. Additionally, the system was useful for predicting the progression of SBC in early tumor stages. Finally, these ratios can also be used to evaluate tumor blood supply, which is of therapeutic significance.

There were limitations to the current study. First, the relatively short follow-up was not sufficient for analyzing long-term outcomes; accordingly, the incidence of terminal events was relatively low for the OS and PFS. Second, the patients were grouped on the basis of retrospective assessments; therefore, further prospective studies are needed to validate the effectiveness of the grading system.

Conclusions

The tumor-to-pons SI ratio is of diagnostic and potential therapeutic significance for patients with SBC. A higher RT2 value predicted slow tumor progression, whereas a higher REN value was a risk factor for tumor progression. A grading system based on RT2 and REN was useful for predicting tumor blood supply and SBC progression. MR grade III tumors have a more abundant blood supply than MR grade I tumors, and the risk of SBC progression increases with each MR grade increase.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81472370 and 81541146), the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality, China (grant No. 7142052 and 7163212), and the National High Technology Research and Development Program 863 (grant no. 2014AA020610).

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Niu X,
    2. Xu H,
    3. Inwards CY, et al
    . Primary bone tumors: epidemiologic comparison of 9200 patients treated at Beijing Ji Shui Tan hospital, Beijing, China, with 10 165 patients at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2015;139:1149–55 doi:10.5858/arpa.2014-0432-OA pmid:25978765
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Salisbury JR
    . The pathology of the human notochord. J Pathol 1993;171:253–55 doi:10.1002/path.1711710404 pmid:8158454
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Ho KL
    . Ecchordosis physaliphora and chordoma: a comparative ultrastructural study. Clin Neuropathol 1985;4:77–86 pmid:3995810
    PubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Chambers KJ,
    2. Lin DT,
    3. Meier J, et al
    . Incidence and survival patterns of cranial chordoma in the United States. Laryngoscope 2014;124:1097–102 doi:10.1002/lary.24420 pmid:24122844
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. McMaster ML,
    2. Goldstein AM,
    3. Bromley CM, et al
    . Chordoma: incidence and survival patterns in the United States, 1973–1995. Cancer Causes Control 2001;12:1–11 doi:10.1023/A:1008947301735 pmid:11227920
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Smoll NR,
    2. Gautschi OP,
    3. Radovanovic I, et al
    . Incidence and relative survival of chordomas: the standardized mortality ratio and the impact of chordomas on a population. Cancer 2013;119:2029–37 doi:10.1002/cncr.28032 pmid:23504991
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Stüer C,
    2. Schramm J,
    3. Schaller C
    . Skull base chordomas: management and results. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2006;46:118–24; discussion 124–25 pmid:16565581
    PubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Jian BJ,
    2. Bloch OG,
    3. Yang I, et al
    . Adjuvant radiation therapy and chondroid chordoma subtype are associated with a lower tumor recurrence rate of cranial chordoma. J Neurooncol 2010;98:101–08 doi:10.1007/s11060-009-0068-1 pmid:19953297
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Amendola BE,
    2. Amendola MA,
    3. Oliver E, et al
    . Chordoma: role of radiation therapy. Radiology 1986;158:839–43 doi:10.1148/radiology.158.3.3945761 pmid:3945761
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Jones PS,
    2. Aghi MK,
    3. Muzikansky A, et al
    . Outcomes and patterns of care in adult skull base chordomas from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. J Clin Neurosci 2014;21:1490–96 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2014.02.008 pmid:24852903
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Walcott BP,
    2. Nahed BV,
    3. Mohyeldin A, et al
    . Chordoma: current concepts, management, and future directions. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:e69–76 doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70337-0 pmid:22300861
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Stacchiotti S,
    2. Sommer J
    . Building a global consensus approach to chordoma: a position paper from the medical and patient community. Lancet Oncol 2015;16:e71–83 doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71190-8 pmid:25638683
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Wang L,
    2. Tian K,
    3. Wang K, et al
    . Factors for tumor progression in patients with skull base chordoma. Cancer Med 2016;5:2368–77 doi:10.1002/cam4.834 pmid:27546605
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Tian K,
    2. Wang L,
    3. Wang K, et al
    . Analysis of clinical features and outcomes of skull base chordoma in different age-groups. World Neurosurg 2016;92:407–17 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2016.05.035 pmid:27237421
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Flanagan AM,
    2. Yamaguchi T
    . World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of Soft Tissue and Bone: Notochordal. Lyon: IARC Press; 2013:328–29
  16. 16.↵
    1. Meyer JE,
    2. Lepke RA,
    3. Lindfors KK, et al
    . Chordomas: their CT appearance in the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine. Radiology 1984;153:693–96 doi:10.1148/radiology.153.3.6494465 pmid:6494465
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Sze G,
    2. Uichanco LR 3rd.,
    3. Brant-Zawadzki MN, et al
    . Chordomas: MR imaging. Radiology 1988;166:187–91 doi:10.1148/radiology.166.1.3336677 pmid:3336677
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Nowak J,
    2. Seidel C,
    3. Pietsch T, et al
    . Systematic comparison of MRI findings in pediatric ependymoblastoma with ependymoma and CNS primitive neuroectodermal tumor not otherwise specified. Neuro Oncol 2015;17:1157–65 doi:10.1093/neuonc/nov063 pmid:25916887
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Takashima S,
    2. Sone S,
    3. Horii A, et al
    . Major salivary gland lesions: correlation of MR findings with flow cytometric DNA analysis and prognosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:1297–304 doi:10.2214/ajr.167.5.8911200 pmid:8911200
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Worthley SG,
    2. Reis ED,
    3. Helft G, et al
    . Serial magnetic resonance imaging correlates with neurological outcome in an experimental model of spinal cord ischemia. Spinal Cord 2008;46:222–27 doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3102108 pmid:17680014
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Massaro AN,
    2. Kadom N,
    3. Chang T, et al
    . Quantitative analysis of magnetic resonance images and neurological outcome in encephalopathic neonates treated with whole-body hypothermia. J Perinatol 2010;30:596–603 doi:10.1038/jp.2010.7 pmid:20182435
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. El Kady RM,
    2. Choudhary AK,
    3. Tappouni R
    . Accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient value measurement on PACS workstation: a comparative analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:W280–84 doi:10.2214/AJR.10.4706 pmid:21343475
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Makhdoomi R,
    2. Ramzan A,
    3. Khursheed N, et al
    . Clinicopathological characteristics of chordoma: an institutional experience and a review of the literature. Turk Neurosurg 2013;23:700–06 pmid:24310451
    PubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Wu Z,
    2. Zhang J,
    3. Zhang L, et al
    . Prognostic factors for long-term outcome of patients with surgical resection of skull base chordomas: 106 cases review in one institution. Neurosurg Rev 2010;33:451–56 doi:10.1007/s10143-010-0273-6 pmid:20668904
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Shinmura R,
    2. Matsui O,
    3. Kobayashi S, et al
    . Cirrhotic nodules: association between MR imaging signal intensity and intranodular blood supply. Radiology 2005;237:512–19 doi:10.1148/radiol.2372041389 pmid:16244260
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received October 14, 2016.
  • Accepted after revision January 22, 2017.
  • © 2017 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 38 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 38, Issue 6
1 Jun 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MR Imaging Grading System for Skull Base Chordoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
K. Tian, L. Wang, J. Ma, K. Wang, D. Li, J. Du, G. Jia, Z. Wu, J. Zhang
MR Imaging Grading System for Skull Base Chordoma
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2017, 38 (6) 1206-1211; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5152

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
MR Imaging Grading System for Skull Base Chordoma
K. Tian, L. Wang, J. Ma, K. Wang, D. Li, J. Du, G. Jia, Z. Wu, J. Zhang
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2017, 38 (6) 1206-1211; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5152
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • MRI Signal Intensity and Electron Ultrastructure Classification Predict the Long-Term Outcome of Skull Base Chordomas
  • Prognostic Implications of Gadolinium Enhancement of Skull Base Chordomas
  • Crossref (20)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Radiomic analysis of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating skull base chordoma and chondrosarcoma
    Longfei Li, Ke Wang, Xiujian Ma, Zhenyu Liu, Shuo Wang, Jiang Du, Kaibing Tian, Xuezhi Zhou, Wei wei, Kai Sun, Yusong Lin, Zhen Wu, Jie Tian
    European Journal of Radiology 2019 118
  • Radiomics and Dosiomics for Predicting Local Control after Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy in Skull-Base Chordoma
    Giulia Buizza, Chiara Paganelli, Emma D’Ippolito, Giulia Fontana, Silvia Molinelli, Lorenzo Preda, Giulia Riva, Alberto Iannalfi, Francesca Valvo, Ester Orlandi, Guido Baroni
    Cancers 2021 13 2
  • Radiomic signature: A novel magnetic resonance imaging-based prognostic biomarker in patients with skull base chordoma
    Wei Wei, Ke Wang, Zhenyu Liu, Kaibing Tian, Liang Wang, Jiang Du, Junpeng Ma, Shuo Wang, Longfei Li, Rui Zhao, Luo Cui, Zhen Wu, Jie Tian
    Radiotherapy and Oncology 2019 141
  • 5-Aminolevulinic acid-based photodynamic therapy of chordoma: In vitro experiments on a human tumor cell line
    Jan F. Cornelius, Lennert Eismann, Lara Ebbert, Brigitte Senger, Athanasios K. Petridis, Marcel Alexander Kamp, Rüdiger V. Sorg, Hans Jakob Steiger
    Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy 2017 20
  • Chordoma: To know means to recognize
    Emija Nikola Karele, Anda Nikola Paze
    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer 2022 1877 5
  • Long and Very-Long-Chain Ceramides Correlate with A More Aggressive Behavior in Skull Base Chordoma Patients
    Emanuele La Corte, Michele Dei Cas, Alberto Raggi, Monica Patanè, Morgan Broggi, Silvia Schiavolin, Chiara Calatozzolo, Bianca Pollo, Carlotta Pipolo, Maria Grazia Bruzzone, Giuseppe Campisi, Rita Paroni, Riccardo Ghidoni, Paolo Ferroli
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2019 20 18
  • Tumor Growth Rate as a New Predictor of Progression-Free Survival After Chordoma Surgery
    Thibault Passeri, Paolo di Russo, Pierre-Olivier Champagne, Anne-Laure Bernat, Jérome Cartailler, Jean Pierre Guichard, Hamid Mammar, Lorenzo Giammattei, Homa Adle-Biassette, Bernard George, Emmanuel Mandonnet, Sébastien Froelich
    Neurosurgery 2021 89 2
  • MRI enhancement patterns in 28 cases of clival chordomas
    Ian T. Mark, Jamie J. Van Gompel, Carrie Y. Inwards, Matthew K. Ball, Jonathan M. Morris, Carrie M. Carr
    Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 2022 99
  • The Human Hypothalamus: Anterior Region
    Milica Perosevic, Pamela S. Jones, Nicholas A. Tritos
    2021 179
  • High expression of survivin independently correlates with tumor progression and mortality in patients with skull base chordomas
    Junpeng Ma, Kaibing Tian, Jiang Du, Zhen Wu, Liang Wang, Junting Zhang
    Journal of Neurosurgery 2020 132 1

More in this TOC Section

  • NI-RADS for HEAD&NECK Cancer Recurrence
  • WHO Classification Update: Nasal&Skull Base Tumors
  • Peritumoral Signal in Vestibular Schwannomas
Show more HEAD & NECK

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire