Introduction of a Dedicated Emergency Department MR Imaging Scanner at the Barrow Neurological Institute

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Levin DC,
   3. Rao VM,
   4. Parker L, et al

   . Continued growth in emergency department imaging is bucking the overall trends. J Am Coll Radiol 2014;11:1044–47 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2014.07.008 pmid:25439619

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Rankey D,
   3. Leach JL,
   4. Leach SD

   . Emergency MRI utilization trends at a tertiary care academic medical center: baseline data. Acad Radiol 2008;15:438–43 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2008.01.003 pmid:18342768

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Arasu VA,
   3. Abujudeh HH,
   4. Biddinger PD, et al

   . Diagnostic emergency imaging utilization at an academic trauma center from 1996 to 2012. J Am Coll Radiol 2015;12:467–74 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2014.11.018 pmid:25622765

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Raja AS,
   3. Ip IK,
   4. Sodickson AD, et al

   . Radiology utilization in the emergency department: trends of the past 2 decades. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;203:355–60 doi:10.2214/AJR.13.11892 pmid:25055271

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Ahn S,
   3. Kim WY,
   4. Lim KS, et al

   . Advanced radiology utilization for a tertiary care emergency department from 2001 to 2010. PLoS One 2014;9:e112650 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112650 pmid:25406081

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Brenner DJ,
   3. Hall EJ

   . Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2277–84 doi:10.1056/NEJMra072149 pmid:18046031

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Smith-Bindman R,
   3. Lipson J,
   4. Marcus R, et al

   . Radiation dose associated with common computed tomographic examinations and the associated life-time attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:2078–86 doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.427 pmid:20008690

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Berrington de González A,
   3. Mahesh M,
   4. Kim KP, et al

   . Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:2071–77 doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.440 pmid:20008689

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Sodickson A,
   3. Baeyens PF,
   4. Andriole KP, et al

   . Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. Radiology 2009;251:175–84 doi:10.1148/radiol.2511081296 pmid:19332852

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Zhang WI,
    3. Li M,
    4. Zhang B, et al

    . CT angiography of the head-and-neck vessels acquired with low tube voltage, low iodine, and iterative image reconstruction: clinical evaluation of radiation dose and image quality. PLoS One 2013;8:e81486 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081486 pmid:24339936

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Reimann AJ,
    3. Davison C,
    4. Bjarnason T, et al

    . Organ-based computed tomographic (CT) radiation dose reduction to the lenses: impact on image quality for CT of the head. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2012;36:334–38 doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e318251ec61 pmid:22592620

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Ketelsen D,
    3. Buchgeister M,
    4. Fenchel M, et al

    . Automated computed tomography dose-saving algorithm to protect radiosensitive tissue: estimation of radiation exposure and image quality considerations. Invest Radiol 2012;47:148–52 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182311504 pmid:21934513

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    American College of Radiology: Appropriateness Criteria. https://acsearch.acr.org/list. Accessed December 27, 2016.
14. 14.↵
    2. Fiebach JB,
    3. Schellinger PD,
    4. Jansen O, et al

    . CT and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in randomized order: diffusion-weighted imaging results in higher accuracy and lower interrater variability in the diagnosis of hyperacute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2002;33:2206–10 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000026864.20339.CB pmid:12215588

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Chalela JA,
    3. Kidwell CS,
    4. Nentwich LM, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute stroke: a prospective comparison. Lancet 2007;369:293–98 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60151-2 pmid:17258669

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Kidwell CS,
    3. Chalela JA,
    4. Saver JL, et al

    . Comparison of MRI and CT for detection of acute intracerebral hemorrhage. JAMA 2004;292:1823–30 doi:10.1001/jama.292.15.1823 pmid:15494579

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Fiebach JB,
    3. Schellinger PD,
    4. Gass A, et al

    . Stroke magnetic resonance imaging is accurate in hyperacute intracerebral hemorrhage: a multicenter study on the validity of stroke imaging. Stroke 2004;35:502–06 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000114203.75678.88 pmid:14739410

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Dannenberg S,
    3. Scheitz JF,
    4. Rozanski M, et al

    . Number of cerebral microbleeds and risk of intracerebral hemorrhage after intravenous thrombolysis. Stroke 2014;45:2900–05 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006448 pmid:25116882

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Kidwell CS,
    3. Saver JL,
    4. Villablanca JP, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging detection of microbleeds before thrombolysis: an emerging application. Stroke 2002;33:95–98 doi:10.1161/hs0102.101792 pmid:11779895

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Thomalla G,
    3. Cheng B,
    4. Ebinger M, et al

    ; STIR and VISTA Imaging Investigators. DWI-FLAIR mismatch for the identification of patients with acute ischaemic stroke within 4 5 h of symptom onset (PRE-FLAIR): a multicenter observational study. Lancet Neurol 2011;10:978–86 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70192-2 pmid:21978972

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Thomalla G,
    3. Rossbach P,
    4. Rosenkranz M, et al

    . Negative fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging identifies acute ischemic stroke at 3 hours or less. Ann Neurol 2009;65:724–32 doi:10.1002/ana.21651 pmid:19557859

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Aoki J,
    3. Kimura K,
    4. Iguchi Y, et al

    . FLAIR can estimate the onset time in acute ischemic stroke patients. J Neurol Sci 2010;293:39–44 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2010.03.011 pmid:20416885

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Petkova M,
    3. Rodrigo S,
    4. Lamy C, et al

    . MR imaging helps predict time from symptom onset in patients with acute stroke: implications for patients with unknown onset time. Radiology 2010;257:782–92 doi:10.1148/radiol.10100461 pmid:21045177

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Schellinger PD,
    3. Thomalla G,
    4. Fiehler J, et al

    . MRI-based and CT-based thrombolytic therapy in acute stroke within and beyond established time windows: an analysis of 1210 patients. Stroke 2007;38:2640–45 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.483255 pmid:17702961

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Randoux B,
    3. Marro B,
    4. Koskas F, et al

    . Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. Radiology 2001;220:179–85 doi:10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl35179 pmid:11425993

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Yang CW,
    3. Carr JC,
    4. Futterer SF, et al

    . Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid and vertebrobasilar circulations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2095–101 pmid:16155164

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. U-King-Im JM,
    3. Trivedi RA,
    4. Cross JJ, et al

    . Measuring carotid stenosis on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: diagnostic performance and reproducibility of 3 different methods. Stroke 2004;35:2083–88 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000136722.30008.b1 pmid:15243149

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Nael K,
    3. Meshksar A,
    4. Ellingson B, et al

    . Combined low-dose contrast-enhanced MR angiography and perfusion for acute ischemic stroke at 3T: a more efficient stroke protocol. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1078–84 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3848 pmid:24503557

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. Alfke K,
    3. Jensen U,
    4. Pool C, et al

    . Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in stroke diagnostics: additional information compared with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography? Clin Neuroradiol 2011;21:5–10 doi:10.1007/s00062-010-0039-0 pmid:21109990

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Saager C,
    3. Fitting T,
    4. Goebell E, et al

    . Contrast-enhanced MR angiography improves detection of carotid T-occlusion by acute stroke MRI. Clin Neuroradiol 2008;18:163–67 doi:10.1007/s00062-008-8020-x

    CrossRef
31. 31.↵
    2. da Rocha AJ,
    3. da Silva CJ,
    4. Gama HP, et al

    . Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging sequences with computed tomography to detect low-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage: role of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2006;30:295–303 doi:10.1097/00004728-200603000-00025 pmid:16628051

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Yuan MK,
    3. Lai PH,
    4. Chen JY, et al

    . Detection of subarachnoid hemorrhage at acute and subacute/chronic stages: comparison of four magnetic resonance imaging pulse sequences and computed tomography. J Chin Med Assoc 2005;68:131–37 doi:10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70234-5 pmid:15813247

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Verma RK,
    3. Kottke R,
    4. Andereggen L, et al

    . Detecting subarachnoid hemorrhage: comparison of combined FLAIR/SWI versus CT. Eur J Radiol 2013;82:1539–45 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.03.021 pmid:23632159

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Paterakis K,
    3. Karantanas AH,
    4. Komnos A, et al

    . Outcome of patients with diffuse axonal injury: the significance and prognostic value of MRI in the acute phase. J Trauma 2000;49:1071–75 doi:10.1097/00005373-200012000-00016 pmid:11130491

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Lee H,
    3. Wintermark M,
    4. Gean AD, et al

    . Focal lesions in acute mild traumatic brain injury and neurocognitive outcome CT vs 3T MRI. J Neurotrauma 2008;25:1049–56 doi:10.1089/neu.2008.0566 pmid:18707244

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    2. Mittl RG,
    3. Grossman RI,
    4. Hiehle JF, et al

    . Prevalence of MR evidence of diffuse axonal injury in patients with mild head injury and normal head CT findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1583–89 pmid:7985582

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    2. Morais DF,
    3. de Melo Neto JS,
    4. Meguins LC, et al

    . Clinical applicability of magnetic resonance imaging in acute spinal cord trauma. Eur Spine J 2014;23:1457–63 doi:10.1007/s00586-013-3047-3 pmid:24091790

    CrossRefPubMed