Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Spinal CSF Leak Articles (Jan 2020-June 2024)
    • 2024 AJNR Journal Awards
    • Most Impactful AJNR Articles
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcast
    • AJNR Scantastics
    • Video Articles
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Policies
    • Fast publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Submit a Case for the Case Collection
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Welcome to the new AJNR, Updated Hall of Fame, and more. Read the full announcements.


AJNR is seeking candidates for the position of Associate Section Editor, AJNR Case Collection. Read the full announcement.

 

Letter

Regarding “What Is the Ideal Core Number for Ultrasonography-Guided Thyroid Biopsy of Cytologically Inconclusive Nodules?”

H.S. Park, J.H. Baek and N.D. Gyu
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2017, 38 (8) E53-E54; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5231
H.S. Park
aDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology University of Ulsan College of Medicine Asan Medical Center Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for H.S. Park
J.H. Baek
aDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology University of Ulsan College of Medicine Asan Medical Center Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.H. Baek
N.D. Gyu
bDepartment of Radiology GangNeung Asan Hospital Seoul, Korea
cDepartment of Radiology Human Medical Imaging and Intervention Center Seoul, Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for N.D. Gyu
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

We read with great interest the article “What Is the Ideal Core Number for Ultrasonography-Guided Thyroid Biopsy of Cytologically Inconclusive Nodules?” by Hahn et al.1 In that study, the authors evaluated the correct number of core-needle specimens for patients with previously inconclusive fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNA) results and suggested that at least 2 core specimens containing intranodular and capsular tissue are necessary for a proper diagnosis. In their results, the diagnostic ability of 2 specimens was found to be higher than that of 1 specimen and was similar to that of 3 specimens. This concept is concordant with that of the recent core-needle biopsy (CNB) guidelines published by the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology.2 Application of the results of Hahn et al1 will help patients to avoid repeated FNAs or diagnostic surgery. Thanks to the valuable results in CNB skills and pathologic evaluation of core specimens. This study explained comprehensive aspects of the number of core specimens, and this concept had not been reported to date. The authors revealed several important aspects of core biopsy after previously inconclusive FNA results: 1) CNB achieved no nondiagnostic results; 2) the rate of inconclusive results was just 6.7% (4 of 60); 3) the final surgical pathology was well correlated with the core biopsy results; and 4) CNB procedures were tolerable in all patients. Thus, CNB is an effective and safe procedure for patients with previously inconclusive results, and these findings are concordant with those of previous CNB studies.

Although the study of Hahn et al1 obtained informative results, there are 3 points to be considered. The first is the relationship between the number of core specimens and the size of the specimen notch of the core device. Second, capsule information is necessary, especially for diagnosing follicular neoplasm; however, a core technique including the capsule is not recommended in all patients, especially those with suspected papillary thyroid cancers. Finally, to justify 2 core specimens, the complications of the 3 groups should be compared. Regarding the relationship between the core specimen number and the size of the specimen notch of the core device, a core device with a large specimen notch requires fewer core specimens. The authors used a 1.1-cm excursion core device, which has a 0.7-cm specimen notch. This obtains a core specimen of approximately 0.7 cm in length. A 1.6-cm excursion core device can obtain a 1.2-cm specimen length, whereas a 2-cm excursion device can obtain a 1.6-cm specimen length. Therefore, 2 specimens obtained by a 1.1-cm device are similar to 1 specimen obtained by a 1.6- or 2-cm core device. In addition, an 18-gauge core device can obtain larger-bore tissue than a 20- or 21-gauge core device. However, complications should be compared among devices with different lengths or thicknesses. Regarding capsule information, capsules can help to diagnose follicular neoplasms. Current CNB guidelines recommend that a nodule capsule be obtained during core biopsy.2 However, capsule information is unnecessary for the diagnosis of papillary thyroid cancers. Therefore, the use of an extra core biopsy should be restricted to certain types of thyroid nodules. Suh et al3 performed less than 2 core biopsy, but inconclusive results is not high in their factor analysis. Multiple biopsies can cause more complications; this issue should be considered during CNB procedures. To minimize complications, the operators performing CNB should understand the basic techniques and perithyroidal structures.4

In conclusion, Hahn et al1 have reported valuable results on the number of core specimens needed for patients with previously inconclusive FNA results in thyroid biopsy. Although these data are practically important, knowledge of the core device, the relationship between specimen notch and specimen length, the type of thyroid nodule, and possible complications is essential for operators to perform thyroid CNB.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Jung Hwan Baek—UNRELATED: Consultancy: RFA Company, ATARmed and RF Medical, Comments: since 2017, $2700/year.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Hahn SY,
    2. Shin JH,
    3. Oh YL
    . What is the ideal core number for ultrasonography-guided thyroid biopsy of cytologically inconclusive nodules? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:777–81 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5075 pmid:28154123
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Na DG,
    2. Baek JH,
    3. Jung SL, et al
    . Core needle biopsy of the thyroid: 2016 consensus statement and recommendations from Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology. Korean J Radiol 2017;18:217–37 doi:10.3348/kjr.2017.18.1.217 pmid:28096731
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Suh CH,
    2. Baek JH,
    3. Lee JH, et al
    . The role of core-needle biopsy as a first-line diagnostic tool for initially detected thyroid nodules. Thyroid 2016;26:395–403 doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0404 pmid:26651390
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Ha EJ,
    2. Baek JH,
    3. Lee JH
    . Ultrasonography-based thyroidal and perithyroidal anatomy and its clinical significance. Korean J Radiol 2015;16:749–66 doi:10.3348/kjr.2015.16.4.749 pmid:26175574
    CrossRefPubMed
  • © 2017 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 38 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 38, Issue 8
1 Aug 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Regarding “What Is the Ideal Core Number for Ultrasonography-Guided Thyroid Biopsy of Cytologically Inconclusive Nodules?”
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
H.S. Park, J.H. Baek, N.D. Gyu
Regarding “What Is the Ideal Core Number for Ultrasonography-Guided Thyroid Biopsy of Cytologically Inconclusive Nodules?”
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2017, 38 (8) E53-E54; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5231

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Regarding “What Is the Ideal Core Number for Ultrasonography-Guided Thyroid Biopsy of Cytologically Inconclusive Nodules?”
H.S. Park, J.H. Baek, N.D. Gyu
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2017, 38 (8) E53-E54; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5231
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (1)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • 2019 Practice guidelines for thyroid core needle biopsy: a report of the Clinical Practice Guidelines Development Committee of the Korean Thyroid Association
    Chan Kwon Jung, Jung Hwan Baek, Dong Gyu Na, Young Lyun Oh, Ka Hee Yi, Ho-Cheol Kang
    Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine 2020 54 1

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editors Choice
  • Fellow Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

Special Collections

  • Special Collections

Resources

  • News and Updates
  • Turn around Times
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Policies
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Submit a Case
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcast
  • AJNR SCANtastic
  • Video Articles

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Alerts
  • Feedback
  • Advertise with us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Permissions
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire