Risk Factor Analysis of Recanalization Timing in Coiled Aneurysms: Early versus Late Recanalization

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Ries T,
   3. Siemonsen S,
   4. Thomalla G, et al

   . Long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms after endovascular therapy prediction and outcome of retreatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1755–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0649 pmid:17885238

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Park W,
   3. Song Y,
   4. Park KJ, et al

   . Hemodynamic characteristics regarding recanalization of completely coiled aneurysms: computational fluid dynamic analysis using virtual models comparison. Neurointervention 2016;11:30–36 doi:10.5469/neuroint.2016.11.1.30 pmid:26958410

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Raymond J,
   3. Guilbert F,
   4. Weill A, et al

   . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000073841.88563.E9 pmid:12775880

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Jeon JP,
   3. Cho YD,
   4. Rhim JK, et al

   . Fate of coiled aneurysms with minor recanalization at 6 months: rate of progression to further recanalization and related risk factors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1490–95 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4763 pmid:26965468

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Jeon JP,
   3. Cho YD,
   4. Rhim JK, et al

   . Extended monitoring of coiled aneurysms completely occluded at 6-month follow-up: late recanalization rate and related risk factors. Eur Radiol 2016;26:3319–26 doi:10.1007/s00330-015-4176-3 pmid:26747259

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Cho YD,
   3. Jeon JP,
   4. Rhim JK, et al

   . Progressive thrombosis of small saccular aneurysms filled with contrast immediately after coil embolization: analysis of related factors and long-term follow-up. Neuroradiology 2015;57:615–23 doi:10.1007/s00234-015-1514-8 pmid:25808124

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Cho YD,
   3. Lee WJ,
   4. Kim KM, et al

   . Stent-assisted coil embolization of posterior communicating artery aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:2171–76 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3541 pmid:23660292

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Cognard C,
   3. Weill A,
   4. Spelle L, et al

   . Long-term angiographic follow-up of 169 intracranial berry aneurysms occluded with detachable coils. Radiology 1999;212:348–56 doi:10.1148/radiology.212.2.r99jl47348 pmid:10429689

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Wardlaw JM,
   3. Cannon JC

   . Color transcranial “power” Doppler ultrasound of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1996;84:459–61 doi:10.3171/jns.1996.84.3.0459 pmid:8609558

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Wardlaw JM,
    3. Cannon J,
    4. Statham PF, et al

    . Does the size of intracranial aneurysms change with intracranial pressure? Observations based on color “power” transcranial Doppler ultrasound. J Neurosurg 1998;88:846–50 doi:10.3171/jns.1998.88.5.0846 pmid:9576252

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Kataoka K,
    3. Taneda M,
    4. Asai T, et al

    . Structural fragility and inflammatory response of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. A comparative study between ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Stroke 1999;30:1396–401 doi:10.1161/01.STR.30.7.1396 pmid:10390313

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Tan IY,
    3. Agid RF,
    4. Willinsky RA

    . Recanalization rates after endovascular coil embolization in a cohort of matched ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 2011;17:27–35 doi:10.1177/159101991101700106 pmid:21561556

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Morales HG,
    3. Kim M,
    4. Vivas EE, et al

    . How do coil configuration and packing density influence intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1935–41 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2635 pmid:21885712

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Sluzewski M,
    3. van Rooij WJ,
    4. Slob MJ, et al

    . Relation between aneurysm volume, packing, and compaction in 145 cerebral aneurysms treated with coils. Radiology 2004;231:653–58 doi:10.1148/radiol.2313030460 pmid:15118115

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Morita A,
    3. Kirino T, et al

    UCAS Japan Investigators, Morita A, Kirino T, et al. The natural course of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. N Engl J Med 2012;366:2474–82 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1113260 pmid:22738097

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Wiebers DO,
    3. Whisnant JP,
    4. Huston J 3rd., et al

    . Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003;362:103–10 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13860-3 pmid:12867109

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Ogilvy CS,
    3. Chua MH,
    4. Fusco MR, et al

    . Validation of a system to predict recanalization after endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2015;77:168–73; discussion 173–74 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000744 pmid:25850603

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Niimi Y,
    3. Song J,
    4. Madrid M, et al

    . Endosaccular treatment of intracranial aneurysms using Matrix coils: early experience and midterm follow-up. Stroke 2006;37:1028–32 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000206459.73897.a3 pmid:16514098

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Murayama Y,
    3. Nien YL,
    4. Duckwiler G, et al

    . Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years' experience. J Neurosurg 2003;98:959–66 doi:10.3171/jns.2003.98.5.0959 pmid:12744354

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Jeon JP,
    3. Cho YD,
    4. Rhim JK, et al

    . Effect of stenting on progressive occlusion of small unruptured saccular intracranial aneurysms with residual sac immediately after coil embolization: a propensity score analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:1025–29 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011947 pmid:26508130

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Lawson MF,
    3. Newman WC,
    4. Chi YY, et al

    . Stent-associated flow remodeling causes further occlusion of incompletely coiled aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2011;69:598–603; discussion 603–04 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182181c2b pmid:21430583

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Park KY,
    3. Kim BM,
    4. Kim DJ

    . Comparison between balloon-assisted and stent-assisted technique for treatment of unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms. Neurointervention 2016;11:99–104 doi:10.5469/neuroint.2016.11.2.99 pmid:27621946

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Liu H,
    3. Choe J,
    4. Jung SC, et al

    . Does a low-wall coverage stent have a flow diverting effect in small aneurysms? Neurointervention 2015;10:89–93 doi:10.5469/neuroint.2015.10.2.89 pmid:26389012

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Hwang SK,
    3. Hwang G,
    4. Bang JS, et al

    . Endovascular Enterprise stent-assisted coil embolization for wide-necked unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Clin Neurosci 2013;20:1276–79 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2012.11.010 pmid:23830596

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Luo CB,
    3. Teng MM,
    4. Chang FC, et al

    . Stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms: a single center experience. J Chin Med Assoc 2012;75:322–28 doi:10.1016/j.jcma.2012.05.003 pmid:22824046

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Kwon SC,
    3. Kwon OK

    , Korean Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm Coiling (KUCAC) Investigators. Endovascular coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a Korean multicenter study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014;156:847–54 doi:10.1007/s00701-014-2033-9 pmid:24610449

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Li C,
    3. Wang S,
    4. Chen J, et al

    . Influence of hemodynamics on recanalization of totally occluded intracranial aneurysms: A patient-specific computational fluid dynamic simulation study. Neurosurg 2012;117:276–83 doi:10.3171/2012.5.JNS111558

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Luo B,
    3. Yang X,
    4. Wang S, et al

    . High shear stress and flow velocity in partially occluded aneurysms prone to recanalization. Stroke 2011;42:745–53 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.593517 pmid:21233477

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. Ortega J,
    3. Hartman J,
    4. Rodriguez J, et al

    . Post-treatment hemodynamics of a basilar aneurysm and bifurcation. Ann Biomed Eng 2008;36:1531–46 doi:10.1007/s10439-008-9535-7 pmid:18629647

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Guo XB,
    3. Fan YM,
    4. Zhang JN

    . HydroSoft coil versus HydroCoil for endovascular aneurysm occlusion study: a single center experience. Eur J Radiol 2011;79:e42–46 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.04.031 pmid:20537831

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Lee JY,
    3. Seo JH,
    4. Lee SJ, et al

    . Mid-term outcome of intracranial aneurysms treated with HydroSoft coils compared to historical controls treated with bare platinum coils: a single-center experience. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014;156:1687–94 doi:10.1007/s00701-014-2157-y pmid:24975277

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Rossitti S

    . Endovascular coiling of intracranial aneurysms using bioactive coils: a single-center study. Acta Radiol 2007;48:565–76 doi:10.1080/02841850701308360 pmid:17520435

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Szikora I,
    3. Seifert P,
    4. Hanzely Z, et al

    . Histopathologic evaluation of aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils or Matrix detachable microcoils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:283–88 pmid:16484393

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    2. Gonzalez NR,
    3. Patel AB,
    4. Murayama Y, et al

    . Angiographic evidence of aneurysm neck healing following endovascular treatment with bioactive coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:912–14 pmid:15814944

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    2. Cho YD,
    3. Kim KM,
    4. Lee WJ, et al

    . Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for follow-up of coil embolization with Enterprise stent for intracranial aneurysm: usefulness of source images. Korean J Radiol 2014;15:161–68 doi:10.3348/kjr.2014.15.1.161 pmid:24497808

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Kallmes DF,
    4. Kadirvel R

    . Mechanisms of healing in coiled intracranial aneurysms: a review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1216–22 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4175 pmid:25430855

    Abstract/FREE Full Text