Effect of an Arm Traction Device on Image Quality and Radiation Exposure during Neck CT: A Prospective Study

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Kalra MK,
   3. Maher MM,
   4. Toth TL, et al

   . Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 2004;230:619–28 doi:10.1148/radiol.2303021726 pmid:14739312

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Russell M,
   3. Fink J,
   4. Rebeles F, et al

   . Balancing radiation dose and image quality: clinical applications of neck volume CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:727–31 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0891 pmid:18223095

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Tamm EP,
   3. Rong XJ,
   4. Cody DD, et al

   . Quality initiatives: CT radiation dose reduction: how to implement change without sacrificing diagnostic quality. Radiographics 2011;31:1823–32 doi:10.1148/rg.317115027 pmid:21969662

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Parakh A,
   3. Kortesniemi M,
   4. Schindera ST

   . CT radiation dose management: a comprehensive optimization process for improving patient safety. Radiology 2016;280:663–73 doi:10.1148/radiol.2016151173 pmid:27533027

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Goenka AH,
   3. Herts BR,
   4. Dong F, et al

   . Image noise, CNR, and detectability of low-contrast, low-attenuation liver lesions in a phantom: effects of radiation exposure, phantom size, integrated circuit detector, and iterative reconstruction. Radiology 2016;280:475–82 doi:10.1148/radiol.2016151621 pmid:26937709

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Kim JH,
   3. Choo KS,
   4. Moon TY, et al

   . Comparison of the image qualities of filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction for CT venography at 80 kVp. Eur Radiol 2016;26:2055–63 doi:10.1007/s00330-015-4060-1 pmid:26486938

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Yoon HJ,
   3. Chung MJ,
   4. Hwang HS, et al

   . Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-applied ultra-low-dose CT with radiography-comparable radiation dose: usefulness for lung nodule detection. Korean J Radiol 2015;16:1132–41 doi:10.3348/kjr.2015.16.5.1132 pmid:26357505

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Wirth S,
   3. Meindl T,
   4. Treitl M, et al

   . Comparison of different patient positioning strategies to minimize shoulder girdle artifacts in head and neck CT. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1757–62 doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0168-7 pmid:16552509

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Choi YJ,
   3. Lee JH,
   4. Cho WY, et al

   . Effect of an arm traction device on image quality and radiation exposure during neck computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 2016;85:68–72 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.11.008 pmid:26724651

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Kranz PG,
    3. Wylie JD,
    4. Hoang JK, et al

    . Effect of the CT table strap on radiation exposure and image quality during cervical spine CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1870–76 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4074 pmid:25059701

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Brink M,
    3. de Lange F,
    4. Oostveen LJ, et al

    . Arm raising at exposure-controlled multidetector trauma CT of thoracoabdominal region: higher image quality, lower radiation dose. Radiology 2008;249:661–70 doi:10.1148/radiol.2492080169 pmid:18936319

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Som PM,
    3. Curtin HD,
    4. Mancuso AA

    . Imaging-based nodal classification for evaluation of neck metastatic adenopathy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:837–44 doi:10.2214/ajr.174.3.1740837 pmid:10701636

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Bankier AA,
    3. Kressel HY

    . Through the Looking Glass revisited: the need for more meaning and less drama in the reporting of dose and dose reduction in CT. Radiology 2012;265:4–8 doi:10.1148/radiol.12121145 pmid:22993216

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Korovessis P,
    3. Koureas G,
    4. Zacharatos S, et al

    . Backpacks, back pain, sagittal spinal curves and trunk alignment in adolescents: a logistic and multinomial logistic analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:247–55 doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000150505.59690.1b pmid:15644765

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Zelenetz AD,
    3. Gordon LI,
    4. Wierda WG, et al

    . Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Version 1.2016. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2016;14:196–231 pmid:26850490

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. AAPM Report 204. College Park, Maryland: American Association of Physicists in Medicine; 2011
17. 17.↵
    2. Christner JA,
    3. Braun NN,
    4. Jacobsen MC, et al

    . Size-specific dose estimates for adult patients at CT of the torso. Radiology 2012;265:841–47 doi:10.1148/radiol.12112365 pmid:23091173

    CrossRefPubMed