Integrating 3D Rotational Angiography into Gamma Knife Planning

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Cohen-Gadol AA,
   3. Pollock BE

   . Radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations in children. J Neurosurg 2006;104:388–91 pmid:16776373

   PubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Lunsford LD,
   3. Kondziolka D,
   4. Flickinger JC, et al

   . Stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations of the brain. J Neurosurg 1991;75:512–24 doi:10.3171/jns.1991.75.4.0512 pmid:1885968

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Karlsson B,
   3. Lindquist C,
   4. Steiner L

   . Prediction of obliteration after gamma knife surgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 1997;40:425–30; discussion 430–31 pmid:9055280

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Schwartz M,
   3. Sixel K,
   4. Young C, et al

   . Prediction of obliteration of arteriovenous malformations after radiosurgery: the obliteration prediction index. Can J Neurol Sci 1997;24:106–09 doi:10.1017/S0317167100021417 pmid:9164685

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Flickinger JC,
   3. Kondziolka D,
   4. Maitz AH, et al

   . An analysis of the dose-response for arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery and other factors affecting obliteration. Radiother Oncol 2002;63:347–54 doi:10.1016/S0167-8140(02)00103-2 pmid:12142099

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Fleetwood IG,
   3. Steinberg GK

   . Arteriovenous malformations. Lancet 2002;359:863–73 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07946-1 pmid:11897302

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Shin M,
   3. Kawamoto S,
   4. Kurita H, et al

   . Retrospective analysis of a 10-year experience of stereotactic radio surgery for arteriovenous malformations in children and adolescents. J Neurosurg 2002;97:779–84 doi:10.3171/jns.2002.97.4.0779 pmid:12405363

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Starke RM,
   3. Kano H,
   4. Ding D, et al

   . Stereotactic radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations: evaluation of long-term outcomes in a multicenter cohort. J Neurosurg 2017;126:36–44 doi:10.3171/2015.9.JNS151311 pmid:26943847

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Starke RM,
   3. Ding D,
   4. Kano H, et al

   . International multicenter cohort study of pediatric brain arteriovenous malformations, part 2: outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2017;19:136–48 doi:10.3171/2016.9.PEDS16284 pmid:27911249

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Blatt DR,
    3. Friedman WA,
    4. Bova FJ

    . Modifications based on computed tomographic imaging in planning the radiosurgical treatment of arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 1993;33:588–95; discussion 595–96 pmid:8232797

    PubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Ding D,
    3. Xu Z,
    4. Shih HH, et al

    . Stereotactic radiosurgery for partially resected cerebral arteriovenous malformations. World Neurosurg 2016;85:263–72 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2015.10.001 pmid:26459698

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Hanakita S,
    3. Koga T,
    4. Shin M, et al

    . The long-term outcomes of radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations in pediatric and adolescent populations. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2015;16:222–31 doi:10.3171/2015.1.PEDS14407 pmid:25955806

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Kano H,
    3. Lunsford LD,
    4. Flickinger JC, et al

    . Stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations, part 1: management of Spetzler-Martin Grade I and II arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 2012;116:11–20 doi:10.3171/2011.9.JNS101740 pmid:22077452

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Kondziolka D,
    3. Lunsford LD,
    4. Kanal E, et al

    . Stereotactic magnetic resonance angiography for targeting in arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 1994;35:585–90; discussion 590–91 doi:10.1227/00006123-199410000-00002 pmid:7808600

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Lunsford LD,
    3. Niranjan A,
    4. Kano H, et al

    . The technical evolution of gamma knife radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations. Prog Neurol Surg 2013;27:22–34 doi:10.1159/000341625 pmid:23258506

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. van der Bom IM,
    3. Gounis MJ,
    4. Ding L, et al

    . Target delineation for radiosurgery of a small brain arteriovenous malformation using high-resolution contrast-enhanced cone beam CT. BMJ Case Rep 2013;2013 doi:10.1136/bcr-2013-010763 pmid:23946527

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Colombo F,
    3. Cavedon C,
    4. Francescon P, et al

    . Three-dimensional angiography for radiosurgical treatment planning for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 2003;98:536–43 doi:10.3171/jns.2003.98.3.0536 pmid:12650425

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Hristov D,
    3. Liu L,
    4. Adler JR, et al

    . Technique for targeting arteriovenous malformations using frameless image-guided robotic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;79:1232–40 doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.05.015 pmid:20801584

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Safain MG,
    3. Rahal JP,
    4. Raval A, et al

    . Use of cone-beam computed tomography angiography in planning for gamma knife radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: a case series and early report. Neurosurgery 2014;74:682–95; discussion 695–96 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000331 pmid:24584136

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Kang J,
    3. Huang J,
    4. Gailloud P, et al

    . Planning evaluation of C-arm cone beam CT angiography for target delineation in stereotactic radiation surgery of brain arteriovenous malformations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014;90:430–37 doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.05.035 pmid:25015197

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Chen KK,
    3. Guo WY,
    4. Yang HC, et al

    . Application of time-resolved 3D digital subtraction angiography to plan cerebral arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:740–46 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5074 pmid:28126751

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Miracle AC,
    3. Mukherji SK

    . Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 1: physical principles. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1088–95 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1653 pmid:19439484

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Kanayama S,
    3. Hara T,
    4. Hamada Y, et al

    . Potential of 80-kV high-resolution cone-beam CT imaging combined with an optimized protocol for neurological surgery. Neuroradiology 2015;57:155–62 doi:10.1007/s00234-014-1447-7 pmid:25370477

    CrossRefPubMed