Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Levels and Neurodevelopmental Outcome in Fetuses with Brain MR Imaging White Matter Hyperintense Signal

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Griffiths PD,
   3. Bradburn M,
   4. Campbell MJ, et al.

   MERIDIAN collaborative group. Use of MRI in the diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities in utero (MERIDIAN): a multicentre, prospective cohort study. Lancet 2017;389:538–46 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8 pmid:27988140

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Guimiot F,
   3. Garel C,
   4. Fallet-Bianco C, et al

   . Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of diffuse white matter ischemic lesions in fetuses: correlations with fetopathologic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:110–115 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0754 pmid:17947368

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Malinger G,
   3. Lev D,
   4. Lerman-Sagie T

   . Imaging of fetal cytomegalovirus infection. Fetal Diagn Ther 2011;29:117–26 doi:10.1159/000321346 pmid:21088375

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Yaniv G,
   3. Hoffmann C,
   4. Weisz B, et al

   . Region-specific reductions in brain apparent diffusion coefficient in cytomegalovirus-infected fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;47:600–07 doi:10.1002/uog.14737 pmid:25412951

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Fazekas F,
   3. Kleinert R,
   4. Offenbacher H, et al

   . Pathologic correlates of incidental MRI white matter signal hyperintensities. Neurology 1993;43:1683–89 doi:10.1212/WNL.43.9.1683 pmid:8414012

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Schneider JF,
   3. Confort-Gouny S,
   4. Le Fur Y, et al

   . Diffusion-weighted imaging in normal fetal brain maturation. Eur Radiol 2007;17:2422–29 doi:10.1007/s00330-007-0634-x pmid:17404738

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Sartor A,
   3. Arthurs O,
   4. Alberti C, et al

   . Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements of the fetal brain during the third trimester of pregnancy: how reliable are they in clinical practice? Prenat Diagn 2014;34:357–66 doi:10.1002/pd.4309 pmid:24375489

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Neil JJ,
   3. Shiran SI,
   4. McKinstry RC, et al

   . Normal brain in human newborns: apparent diffusion coefficient and diffusion anisotropy measured by using diffusion tensor MR imaging. Radiology 1998;209:57–66 doi:10.1148/radiology.209.1.9769812 pmid:9769812

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Girard N,
   3. Confort-Gouny S,
   4. Schneider J, et al

   . MR imaging of brain maturation. J Neuroradiol 2007;34:290–310 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2007.07.007 pmid:17822767

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Toft PB,
    3. Leth H,
    4. Peitersen B, et al

    . The apparent diffusion coefficient of water in gray and white matter of the infant brain. J Comput Assist Tomograph 1996;20:1006–11 doi:10.1097/00004728-199611000-00029 pmid:8933811

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Hoffmann C,
    3. Weisz B,
    4. Lipitz S, et al

    . Regional apparent diffusion coefficient values in 3rd trimester fetal brain. Neuroradiology 2014;56:561–67 doi:10.1007/s00234-014-1359-6 pmid:24748534

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Erdem G1,
    3. Celik O,
    4. Hascalik , et al

    . Diffusion-weighted imaging evaluation of subtle cerebral microstructural changes in intrauterine fetal hydrocephalus. Magn Reson Imaging 2001;25:417–22 pmid:17513078

    PubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Yaniv G,
    3. Katorza E,
    4. Bercovitz R, et al

    . Region-specific changes in brain diffusivity in fetal isolated mild ventriculomegaly. Eur Radiol 2016;26:840–48 doi:10.1007/s00330-015-3893-y pmid:26135001

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Baud O,
    3. Daire JL,
    4. Dalmaz Y, et al

    . Gestational hypoxia induces white matter damage in neonatal rats: a new model of periventricular leukomalacia. Brain Pathol 2004;14:1–10 doi:10.1111/j.1750-3639.2004.tb00492.x pmid:14997932

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Gat I,
    3. Hoffmann C,
    4. Shashar D, et al

    . Fetal brain MRI: novel classification and contribution to sonography. Ultraschall Med 2016;37:176–84 doi:10.1055/s-0034-1384935 pmid:25535813

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Lipitz S,
    3. Hoffmann C,
    4. Feldman B, et al

    . Value of prenatal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of congenital primary cytomegalovirus infection. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;36:709–17 doi:10.1002/uog.7657 pmid:20503234

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Limperopoulos C,
    3. Majnemer A,
    4. Steinbach CL, et al

    . Equivalence reliability of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale between in-person and telephone administration. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2006;26:115–27 pmid:16938828

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Sparrow SS,
    3. Cicchetti D,
    4. Balla DA

    . Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. 2nd ed. San Antonio; Pearson: 2005
19. 19.↵
    2. Oosterom N,
    3. Nijman J,
    4. Gunkel J, et al

    . Neuro-imaging findings in infants with congenital cytomegalovirus infection: relation to trimester of infection. Neonatology 2015;107:289–96 doi:10.1159/000375439 pmid:25790782

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. de Vries LS,
    3. Gunardi H,
    4. Barth PG, et al

    . The spectrum of cranial ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities in congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Neuropediatrics 2004;35:113–19 doi:10.1055/s-2004-815833 pmid:15127310

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Cannie MM,
    3. Devlieger R,
    4. Leyder M, et al

    . Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: contribution and best timing of prenatal MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2016;26:3760–69 doi:10.1007/s00330-015-4187-0 pmid:26984434

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Doneda C,
    3. Parazzini C,
    4. Righini A, et al

    . Early cerebral lesions in cytomegalovirus infection: prenatal MR imaging. Radiology 2010;255:613–21 doi:10.1148/radiol.10090749 pmid:20413771

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. van der Knaap MS,
    3. Vermeulen G,
    4. Barkhof F, et al

    . Pattern of white matter abnormalities at MR imaging: use of polymerase chain reaction testing of Guthrie cards to link pattern with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Radiology 2004;230:529–36 doi:10.1148/radiol.2302021459 pmid:14752192

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Manara R,
    3. Balao L,
    4. Baracchini C, et al

    . Brain magnetic resonance findings in symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Pediatr Radiol 2011;41:962–70 doi:10.1007/s00247-011-2120-5 pmid:21597906

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Hart CK,
    3. Wiley S,
    4. Choo DI, et al

    . Developmental disabilities and intracranial abnormalities in children with symptomatic cytomegalovirus and cochlear implants. ISRN Otolaryngol 2012;2012:502746 doi:10.5402/2012/502746 pmid:23762614

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Kotovich D,
    3. Guedalia JS,
    4. Hoffmann C, et al

    . Apparent diffusion coefficient value changes and clinical correlation in 90 cases of cytomegalovirus-infected fetuses with unremarkable fetal MRI results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1443–48 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5222 pmid:28522662

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Vannucci RC,
    3. Christensen MA,
    4. Yager JY

    . Nature, time-course, and extent of cerebral edema in perinatal hypoxic-ischemic brain damage. Pediatr Neurol 1993;9:29–34 doi:10.1016/0887-8994(93)90006-X pmid:8452596

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Lodygensky GA,
    3. West T,
    4. Moravec MD, et al

    . Diffusion characteristics associated with neuronal injury and glial activation following hypoxia-ischemia in the immature brain. Magn Reson Med 2011;66:839–45 doi:10.1002/mrm.22869 pmid:21394776

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Miller SP,
    3. Vigneron DB,
    4. Henry RG, et al

    . Serial quantitative diffusion tensor MRI of the premature brain: development in newborns with and without injury. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:621–62 doi:10.1002/jmri.10205 pmid:12451575

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. Naing ZW,
    3. Scott GM,
    4. Shand A, et al

    . Congenital cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy: a review of prevalence, clinical features, diagnosis and prevention. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2016;56:9–18 doi:10.1111/ajo.12408 pmid:26391432

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Lipitz S,
    3. Yinon Y,
    4. Malinger G, et al

    . Risk of cytomegalovirus-associated sequelae in relation to time of infection and findings on prenatal imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;508–14 doi:10.1002/uog.12377pmid:23288698

    CrossRefPubMed