Spinal Imaging Findings of Open Spinal Dysraphisms on Fetal and Postnatal MRI

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Glenn OA,
   3. Barkovich J

   . Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain and spine: an increasingly important tool in prenatal diagnosis: Part 2. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1807–14 pmid:17032846

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Glenn OA,
   3. Barkovich AJ

   . Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain and spine: an increasingly important tool in prenatal diagnosis—Part 1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1604–11 pmid:16971596

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Adzick NS,
   3. Thom EA,
   4. Spong CY, et al

   . A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med 2011;364:993–1004 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1014379.A pmid:21306277

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   Committee on Obstetric Practice Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Maternal-fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. 2017;130:164–67 pmid:28832491

   PubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Husler MR,
   3. Danzer E,
   4. Johnson MP, et al

   . Prenatal diagnosis and postnatal outcome of fetal spinal defects without Arnold-Chiari II malformation. Prenat Diagn 2009;29:1050–57.

   PubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Huang YL,
   3. Wong AM,
   4. Liu HL, et al

   . Fetal magnetic resonance imaging of normal spinal cord: evaluating cord visualization and conus medullaris position by T2-weighted sequences. Biomed J 2014;37:232–36 doi:10.4103/2319-4170.125649 pmid:25116720

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Duczkowska A,
   3. Bekiesinska-Figatowska M,
   4. Herman-Sucharska I, et al

   . Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the fetal spinal canal contents. Brain Dev 2011;33:10–20 doi:10.1016/j.braindev.2010.01.003 pmid:20188501

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Chao TT,
   3. Dashe JS,
   4. Adams RC, et al

   . Fetal spine findings on MRI and associated outcomes in children with open neural tube defects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:956–61 doi:10.2214/AJR.11.6745 pmid:22021549

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Sutton LN

   . Fetal surgery for neural tube defects. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2008;22:175–88 doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2007.07.004 pmid:17714997

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Tortori-Donati P,
    3. Rossi A,
    4. Cama A

    . Spinal dysraphism: a review of neuroradiological features with embryological correlations and proposal for a new classification. Neuroradiology 2000;42:471–91 doi:10.1007/s002340000325 pmid:10952179

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Pang D,
    3. Dias M,
    4. Ahab-Barmada M

    . Split cord malformation, Part I: a unified theory of embryogenesis for double spinal cord malformations. Neurosurgery 1992;31:451–80 doi:10.1227/00006123-199209000-00010 pmid:1407428

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Sutton LN,
    3. Adzick NS,
    4. Bilaniuk LT, et al

    . Improvement in hindbrain herniation demonstrated by serial fetal magnetic resonance imaging following fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. JAMA 1999;282:1826–31 pmid:10573273

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Nagaraj UD,
    3. Bierbrauer KS,
    4. Zhang B, et al

    . Hindbrain herniation in Chiari II malformation on fetal and postnatal MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1031–36 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5116 pmid:28279990

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Levine D,
    3. Trop I,
    4. Mehta TS, et al

    . MR imaging appearance of fetal cerebral ventricular morphology. Radiology 2002;223:652–60 doi:10.1148/radiol.2233011336 pmid:12034931

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Garel C,
    3. Alberti C

    . Coronal measurement of the fetal lateral ventricles: comparison between ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;27:23–27 doi:10.1002/uog.2666 pmid:16323152

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Servaes S,
    3. Hernandez A,
    4. Gonzalez L, et al

    . Fetal MRI of clubfoot associated with myelomeningocele. Pediatr Radiol 2010;40:1874–79. doi:10.1007/s00247-010-1708-5 pmid:20490482

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. McEwing RL,
    3. Pretorius DH,
    4. James HE, et al

    . Prenatal assignation of lesion levels in neural tube defects by using ultrasonography: case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 2005;102(2 Suppl):248–51 doi:10.3171/jns.2005.102.2.0248 pmid:16156240

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Aaronson OS,
    3. Hernanz-Schulman M,
    4. Bruner JP, et al

    . Myelomeningocele: prenatal evaluation-comparison between transabdominal US and MR imaging. Radiology 2003;227:839–43 doi:10.1148/radiol.2273020535 pmid:12714679

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Adzick NS

    . Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele: trials and tribulations—Isabella Forshall Lecture. J Pediatr Surg 2012;47:273–81 doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.11.021 pmid:22325376

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Carreras E,
    3. Maroto A,
    4. Illescas T, et al

    . Prenatal ultrasound evaluation of segmental level of neurological lesion in fetuses with myelomeningocele: development of a new technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;47:162–67 doi:10.1002/uog.15732 pmid:26306897

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Babcook CJ,
    3. Drake CM,
    4. Goldstein RB

    . Spinal level of fetal myelomeningocele: does it influence ventricular size? AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:207–10 doi:10.2214/ajr.169.1.9207526 pmid:9207526

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Tulipan N,
    3. Wellons J,
    4. Thom EA, et al

    ; MOMS Investigators. Prenatal surgery for myelomeningocele and the need for cerebrospinal fluid shunt placement. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2015;16:613–20 doi:10.3171/2015.7.PEDS15336 pmid:26369371

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Gunay H,
    3. Sozbilen MC,
    4. Gurbuz Y, et al

    . Incidence and type of foot deformities in patients with spina bifida according to level of lesion. Childs Nerv Syst 2016;32:315–19 doi:10.1007/s00381-015-2944-7 pmid:26518781

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Sonigo-Cohen P,
    3. Schmit P,
    4. Zerah M, et al

    . Prenatal diagnosis of diastematomyelia. Childs Nerv Syst 2003;19:555–60 doi:10.1007/s00381-003-0771-8 pmid:12845458

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Kutuk MS,
    3. Ozgun MT,
    4. Tas M, et al

    . Prenatal diagnosis of split cord malformation by ultrasound and fetal magnetic resonance imaging: case report and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst 2012;28:2169–72 doi:10.1007/s00381-012-1900-z pmid:22940851

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Rufener SL,
    3. Ibrahim M,
    4. Raybaud CA, et al

    . Congenital spine and spinal cord malformations: pictorial review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194(3 Suppl):26–37 doi:10.2214/AJR.07.7141 pmid:20173174

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Tomsick TA,
    3. Peak E,
    4. Wang L

    . Fluid-signal structures in the cervical spinal cord on MRI: anterior median fissure versus central canal. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:840–45 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5121 pmid:28279989

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Higashida T,
    3. Sasano M,
    4. Sato H, et al

    . Myelomeningocele associated with split cord malformation type I: three case reports. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2010;50:426–30 pmid:20505305

    PubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Borkar SA,
    3. Mahapatra A

    . Split cord malformations: a two years experience at AIIMS. Asian J Neurosurg 2012;7:56–60 doi:10.4103/1793-5482.98643 pmid:22870152

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Ansari S,
    3. Nejat F,
    4. Yazdani S, et al

    . Split cord malformation associated with myelomeningocele. J Neurosurg 2007;107(4 Suppl):281–85 doi:10.3171/PED-07/10/281 pmid:17941491

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Iskandar B,
    3. Mclaughlin C,
    4. Oakes W

    . Split cord malformations in myelomeningocele patients. Br J Neurosurg 2000;14:200–03 doi:10.1080/026886900408360 pmid:10912195

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Bixenmann B,
    3. Kline-Fath BM,
    4. Bierbrauer KS, et al

    . Prenatal and postnatal evaluation for syringomyelia in patients with spinal dysraphism. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2014;14:316–21 doi:10.3171/2014.5.PEDS13482 pmid:24995816

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Levine DN

    . The pathogenesis of syringomyelia associated with lesions at the foramen magnum: a critical review of existing theories and proposal of a new hypothesis. J Neurol Sci 2004;220:3–21 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2004.01.014 pmid:15140600

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    2. Coleman BG,
    3. Langer JE,
    4. Horii SC

    . The diagnostic features of spina bifida: the role of ultrasound. Fetal Diagn Ther 2015;37:179–96 doi:10.1159/000364806 pmid:25341807

    CrossRefPubMed