Flow-Diversion Effect of LEO Stents: Aneurysm Occlusion and Flow Remodeling of Covered Side Branches and Perforators

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Lubicz B,
   3. Kadou A,
   4. Morais R, et al

   . Leo stent for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: very long-term results in 50 patients with 52 aneurysms and literature review. Neuroradiology 2017;59:271–76 doi:10.1007/s00234-017-1805-3 pmid:28251327

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Cho SH,
   3. Jo WI,
   4. Jo YE, et al

   . Bench-top comparison of physical properties of 4 commercially-available self-expanding intracranial stents. Neurointervention 2017;12:31–39 doi:10.5469/neuroint.2017.12.1.31 pmid:28316867

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Aydin K,
   3. Barburoglu M,
   4. Sencer S, et al

   . Flow diversion with low-profile braided stents for the treatment of very small or uncoilable intracranial aneurysms at or distal to the circle of Willis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:2131–37 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5362 pmid:28882859

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Pumar JM,
   3. Arias-Rivas S,
   4. Rodriguez-Yanez M, et al

   . Using Leo Plus stent as flow diverter and endoluminal remodeling in endovascular treatment of intracranial fusiform aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5(Suppl 3):iii22–27 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010661 pmid:23585639

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Bhogal P,
   3. Ganslandt O,
   4. Bazner H, et al

   . The fate of side branches covered by flow diverters: results from 140 patients. World Neurosurg 2017;103:789–98 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.092 pmid:28438653

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Gawlitza M,
   3. Januel AC,
   4. Tall P, et al

   . Flow diversion treatment of complex bifurcation aneurysms beyond the circle of Willis: a single-center series with special emphasis on covered cortical branches and perforating arteries. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:481–87 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011682 pmid:25878068

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Clarençon F,
   3. Di Maria F,
   4. Gabrieli J, et al

   . Clinical impact of flat panel volume CT angiography in evaluating the accurate intraoperative deployment of flow-diverter stents. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1966–72 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5343 pmid:28818824

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Poncyljusz W,
   3. Zwarzany L,
   4. Safranow K

   . Visualization of novel microstents in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms with contrast-enhanced flat panel detector CT. Eur J Radiol 2015;84:1313–17 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.04.015 pmid:25952185

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Roy D,
   3. Milot G,
   4. Raymond J

   . Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke 2001;32:1998–2004 doi:10.1161/hs0901.095600 pmid:11546888

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Gross BA,
    3. Frerichs KU

    . Stent usage in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: past, present and future. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013;84:244–53 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2011-302007 pmid:23138770

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Lv X,
    3. Li Y,
    4. Jiang C, et al

    . Potential advantages and limitations of the Leo stent in endovascular treatment of complex cerebral aneurysms. Eur J Radiol 2011;79:317–22 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.06.021 pmid:20619988

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Wang C,
    3. Tian Z,
    4. Liu J, et al

    . Flow diverter effect of LVIS stent on cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: a comparison with Enterprise stents and the Pipeline device. J Transl Med 2016;14:199 doi:10.1186/s12967-016-0959-9 pmid:27370946

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Daou B,
    3. Valle-Giler EP,
    4. Chalouhi N, et al

    . Patency of the posterior communicating artery following treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device. J Neurosurg 2017;126:564–69 doi:10.3171/2016.2.JNS152544 pmid:27153163

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Vedantam A,
    3. Rao VY,
    4. Shaltoni HM, et al

    . Incidence and clinical implications of carotid branch occlusion following treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 2015;76:173–78; discussion 178 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000595 pmid:25549190

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Lanzino G,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al

    . Patency of the posterior communicating artery after flow diversion treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014;120:84–88 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.02.018 pmid:24731582

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Yu SC,
    3. Kwok CK,
    4. Cheng PW, et al

    . Intracranial aneurysms: midterm outcome of Pipeline embolization device: a prospective study in 143 patients with 178 aneurysms. Radiology 2012;265:893–901 doi:10.1148/radiol.12120422 pmid:22996749

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Burrows AM,
    3. Brinjikji W,
    4. Puffer RC, et al

    . Flow diversion for ophthalmic artery aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016 Jun 2. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4835 pmid:27256849

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Daou B,
    4. Kung D, et al

    . Fate of the ophthalmic artery after treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device. Neurosurgery 2015;77:581–84; discussion 584 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000887 pmid:26191974

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Griessenauer CJ,
    3. Ogilvy CS,
    4. Foreman PM, et al

    . Pipeline Embolization Device for small paraophthalmic artery aneurysms with an emphasis on the anatomical relationship of ophthalmic artery origin and aneurysm. J Neurosurg 2016;125:1352–59 doi:10.3171/2015.12.JNS152499 pmid:26943842

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Kallmes DF,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al

    . Patency of the anterior choroidal artery after flow-diversion treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:537–41 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4139 pmid:25339646

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Raz E,
    3. Shapiro M,
    4. Becske T, et al

    . Anterior choroidal artery patency and clinical follow-up after coverage with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:937–42 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4217 pmid:25572948

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Rangel-Castilla L,
    3. Munich SA,
    4. Jaleel N, et al

    . Patency of anterior circulation branch vessels after Pipeline embolization: longer-term results from 82 aneurysm cases. J Neurosurg 2017;126:1064–69 doi:10.3171/2016.4.JNS16147 pmid:27285547

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Saleme S,
    3. Iosif C,
    4. Ponomarjova S, et al

    . Flow-diverting stents for intracranial bifurcation aneurysm treatment. Neurosurgery 2014;75:623–31; quiz 631 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000522 pmid:25121791

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Cagnazzo F,
    3. Mantilla D,
    4. Lefevre PH, et al

    . Treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms with flow-diverter stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:2289–94 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5388 pmid:28982785

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Rouchaud A,
    3. Brinjikji W,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al

    . Smoking does not affect occlusion rates and morbidity-mortality after Pipeline embolization for intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1122–26 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4664 pmid:26797135

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Matteau A,
    3. Yeh RW,
    4. Camenzind E, et al

    . Balancing long-term risks of ischemic and bleeding complications after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents. Am J Cardiol 2015;116:686–93 doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.05.036 pmid:26187674

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Yeo KK,
    3. Armstrong EJ,
    4. Soni K, et al

    . Long-term outcomes of angiographically confirmed coronary stent thrombosis: results from a multicentre California registry. EuroIntervention 2015;11:188–95 doi:10.4244/EIJV11I2A33 pmid:26093838

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Inoue T,
    3. Croce K,
    4. Morooka T, et al

    . Vascular inflammation and repair: implications for re-endothelialization, restenosis, and stent thrombosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:1057–66 doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2011.05.025 pmid:22017929

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. Puffer RC,
    3. Kallmes DF,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al

    . Patency of the ophthalmic artery after flow diversion treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2012;116:892–96 doi:10.3171/2011.11.JNS111612 pmid:22224787

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    2. Durst CR,
    3. Starke RM,
    4. Clopton D, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of ophthalmic artery aneurysms: ophthalmic artery patency following flow diversion versus coil embolization. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:919–22 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011887 pmid:26354944

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Makoyeva A,
    3. Bing F,
    4. Darsaut TE, et al

    . The varying porosity of braided self-expanding stents and flow diverters: an experimental study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:596–602 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3234 pmid:22878007

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. Rouchaud A,
    3. Leclerc O,
    4. Benayoun Y, et al

    . Visual outcomes with flow-diverter stents covering the ophthalmic artery for treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:330–36 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4129 pmid:25339649

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Hanel R,
    4. Lopes D, et al

    . International retrospective study of the Pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:108–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4111 pmid:25355814

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    2. Wang CB,
    3. Shi WW,
    4. Zhang GX, et al

    . Flow diverter treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms: a meta-analysis. Neuroradiology 2016;58:391–400 doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1649-2 pmid:26801480

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Fiorella D,
    3. Albuquerque FC,
    4. Deshmukh VR, et al

    . Endovascular reconstruction with the Neuroform stent as monotherapy for the treatment of uncoilable intradural pseudoaneurysms. Neurosurgery 2006;59:291–300; discussion 291–300 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000223650.11954.6C pmid:16823325

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    2. Nyberg EM,
    3. Larson TC

    . Beneficial remodeling of small saccular intracranial aneurysms after staged stent only treatment: a case series. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2014;23:80–85 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.09.012 pmid:23153548

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    2. Valdivia y Alvarado M,
    3. Ebrahimi N,
    4. Benndorf G

    . Study of conformability of the new LEO Plus stent to a curved vascular model using flat-panel detector computed tomography (DynaCT). Neurosurgery 2009;64:ons130–134; discussion ons134 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000336304.26756.21 pmid:19240562

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    2. Machi P,
    3. Costalat V,
    4. Lobotesis K, et al

    . LEO Baby Stent use following balloon-assisted coiling: single- and dual-stent technique—immediate and midterm results of 29 consecutive patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2096–103 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4413 pmid:26272976

    Abstract/FREE Full Text