Does Phase-Contrast Imaging through the Cerebral Aqueduct Predict the Outcome of Lumbar CSF Drainage or Shunt Surgery in Patients with Suspected Adult Hydrocephalus?

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Adams RD,
   3. Fisher CM,
   4. Hakim S, et al

   . Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal-fluid pressure: a treatable syndrome. N Engl J Med 1965;273:117–26 doi:10.1056/NEJM196507152730301 pmid:14303656

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Edwards RJ,
   3. Dombrowski SM,
   4. Luciano MG, et al

   . Chronic hydrocephalus in adults. Brain Pathol 2004;14:325–36 doi:10.1111/j.1750-3639.2004.tb00072.x pmid:15446589

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Tarnaris A,
   3. Watkins LD,
   4. Kitchen ND

   . Biomarkers in chronic adult hydrocephalus. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 2006;3:11 doi:10.1186/1743-8454-3-11 pmid:17020616

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Marmarou A,
   3. Young HF,
   4. Aygok GA

   . Estimated incidence of normal-pressure hydrocephalus and shunt outcome in patients residing in assisted-living and extended-care facilities. Neurosurg Focus 2007;22:E1 pmid:17613187

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Kahlon B,
   3. Sjunnesson J,
   4. Rehncrona S

   . Long-term outcome in patients with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 2007;60:327–32; discussion 332 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000249273.41569.6E pmid:17290183

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Resnick SM,
   3. Pham DL,
   4. Kraut MA, et al

   . Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging studies of older adults: a shrinking brain. J Neurosci 2003;23:3295 pmid:2716936

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Vakili S,
   3. Moran D,
   4. Hung A, et al

   . Timing of surgical treatment for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: association between treatment delay and reduced short-term benefit. Neurosurg Focus 2016;41:E2 doi:10.3171/2016.6.FOCUS16146 pmid:27581314

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Halperin JJ,
   3. Kurlan R,
   4. Schwalb JM, et al

   . Practice guideline: idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus—response to shunting and predictors of response: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2015;85:2063–71 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002193 pmid:26644048

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Wikkelsø C,
   3. Hellström P,
   4. Klinge PM, et al

   ; European iNPH Multicentre Study Group. The European iNPH Multicentre Study on the predictive values of resistance to CSF outflow and the CSF tap test in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013;84:562–68 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2012-303314 pmid:23250963

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Bradley WG,
    3. Scalzo D,
    4. Queralt J, et al

    . Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements at MR imaging. Radiology 1996;198:523–29 doi:10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596861 pmid:8596861

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Dixon GR,
    3. Friedman JA,
    4. Luetmer PH, et al

    . Use of cerebrospinal fluid flow rates measured by phase-contrast MR to predict outcome of ventriculoperitoneal shunting for idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Mayo Clin Proc 2002;77:509–14 doi:10.4065/77.6.509 pmid:12059119

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Sankari SE,
    3. Fichten A,
    4. Gondry-Jouet C, et al

    . Correlation between tap test and CSF aqueductal stroke volume in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2012;113:43–46 doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-0923-6_9 pmid:22116421

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Poca MA,
    3. Sahuquillo J,
    4. Busto M, et al

    . Agreement between CSF flow dynamics in MRI and ICP monitoring in the diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus. Sensitivity and specificity of CSF dynamics to predict outcome. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2002;81:7–10

    PubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Bradley WG

    . Intracranial pressure versus phase-contrast MR imaging for normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1631–32 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4507 pmid:26251438

    FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Tisell M,
    3. Tullberg M,
    4. Hellström P, et al

    . Neurological symptoms and signs in adult aqueductal stenosis. Acta Neurol Scand 2003;107:311–17 doi:10.1034/j.1600-0404.2003.00124.x pmid:12713521

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Chiang WW,
    3. Takoudis CG,
    4. Lee SH, et al

    . Relationship between ventricular morphology and aqueductal cerebrospinal fluid flow in healthy and communicating hydrocephalus. Invest Radiol 2009;44:192–99 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e31819a640b

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Algin O,
    3. Hakyemez B,
    4. Parlak M

    . The efficiency of PC-MRI in diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus and prediction of shunt response. Acad Radiol 2010;17:181–87 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2009.08.011 pmid:19910214

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Kahlon B,
    3. Annertz M,
    4. Ståhlberg F, et al

    . Is aqueductal stroke volume, measured with cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging scans useful in predicting outcome of shunt surgery in suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus? Neurosurgery 2007;60:124–29; discussion 129–30 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000249208.04344.A3 pmid:17228260

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Scollato A,
    3. Gallina P,
    4. Di Lorenzo N, et al

    . Is aqueductal stroke volume, measured with cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging scans useful in predicting outcome of shunt surgery in suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus? Neurosurgery 2008;63:E1209; author reply E1209 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000315863.32544.EB pmid:19057301

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Balédent O,
    3. Henry-Feugeas MC,
    4. Idy-Peretti I

    . Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and relation with blood flow: a magnetic resonance study with semiautomated cerebrospinal fluid segmentation. Invest Radiol 2001;36:368–77 doi:10.1097/00004424-200107000-00003 pmid:11496092

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Al-Zain FT,
    3. Rademacher G,
    4. Meier U, et al

    . The role of cerebrospinal fluid flow study using phase contrast MR imaging in diagnosing idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2008;102:119–23

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Bradley WG

    . CSF flow in the brain in the context of normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:831–38 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4124 pmid:25355813

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Scollato A,
    3. Tenenbaum R,
    4. Bahl G, et al

    . Changes in aqueductal CSF stroke volume and progression of symptoms in patients with unshunted idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:192–97 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0785 pmid:17925364

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Bradley WG

    . MR prediction of shunt response in NPH: CSF morphology versus physiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1285 pmid:9726468

    FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Andréen K,
    3. Wikkelsø C,
    4. Tisell M, et al

    . Natural course of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014;85:806–10 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2013-306117 pmid:24292998

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Chaarani B,
    3. Capel C,
    4. Zmudka J, et al

    . Estimation of the lateral ventricles volumes from a 2D image and its relationship with cerebrospinal fluid flow. Biomed Res Int 2013;2013:215989 doi:10.1155/2013/215989 pmid:24151585

    CrossRefPubMed