Parent Artery Reconstruction for Large or Giant Cerebral Aneurysms Using the Tubridge Flow Diverter: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial (PARAT)

References

1. 1.↵
   International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. Unruptured intracranial aneurysm: risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1725–33 doi:10.1056/NEJM199812103392401 pmid:9867550

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Barrow DL,
   3. Alleyne C

   . Natural history of giant intracranial aneurysms and indications for intervention. Clin Neurosurg 1995;42:214–44 pmid:8846594

   PubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Darsaut TE,
   3. Darsaut NM,
   4. Chang SD, et al

   . Predictors of clinical and angiographic outcome after surgical or endovascular therapy of very large and giant intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2011;68:903–15; discussion 915 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182098ad0 pmid:21221025

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Gonzalez NR,
   3. Duckwiler G,
   4. Jahan R, et al

   . Challenges in the endovascular treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2008;62(6 Suppl 3):1324–35 pmid:18695552

   PubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Sluzewski M,
   3. Menovsky T,
   4. van Rooij WJ, et al

   . Coiling of very large or giant cerebral aneurysms: long-term clinical and serial angiographic results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:257–62 pmid:12591644

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Chalouhi N,
   3. Tjoumakaris S,
   4. Gonzalez LF, et al

   . Coiling of large and giant aneurysms: complications and long-term results of 334 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:546–52 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3696 pmid:23945229

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Sadasivan C,
   3. Cesar L,
   4. Seong J, et al

   . Treatment of rabbit elastase-induced aneurysm models by flow diverters: development of quantifiable indexes of device performance using digital subtraction angiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2009;28:1117–25 doi:10.1109/TMI.2008.2012162 pmid:19164085

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Raymond J,
   3. Gentric JC,
   4. Darsaut TE, et al

   . Flow diversion in the treatment of aneurysms: a randomized care trial and registry. J Neurosurg 2017;127:454–62 doi:10.3171/2016.4.JNS152662 pmid:27813466

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Zhou Y,
   3. Yang PF,
   4. Fang YB, et al

   . A novel flow-diverting device (Tubridge) for the treatment of 28 large or giant intracranial aneurysms: a single-center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2326–33 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3925 pmid:24722307

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Brinjikji W,
    4. Boccardi E, et al

    . Aneurysm Study of Pipeline in an Observational Registry (ASPIRe). Interv Neurol 2016;5:89–99 doi:10.1159/000446503 pmid:27610126

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Becske T,
    3. Kallmes DF,
    4. Saatci I, et al

    . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Byrne JV,
    3. Beltechi R,
    4. Yarnold JA, et al

    . Early experience in the treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: a multicentre prospective study. PLoS One 2010;5. pii: e12492 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012492 pmid:20824070

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Nelson PK,
    3. Lylyk P,
    4. Szikora I, et al

    . The Pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:34–40 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2421 pmid:21148256

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Kan P,
    3. Siddiqui AH,
    4. Veznedaroglu E, et al

    . Early postmarket results after treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: a U.S. multicenter experience. Neurosurgery 2012;71:1080–87; discussion 87–88 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827060d9 pmid:22948199

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Wakhloo AK,
    3. Lylyk P,
    4. de Vries J, et al

    ; Surpass Study Group. Surpass flow diverter in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:98–107 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4078 pmid:25125666

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Yu SC,
    3. Kwok CK,
    4. Cheng PW, et al

    . Intracranial aneurysms: midterm outcome of Pipeline embolization device—a prospective study in 143 patients with 178 aneurysms. Radiology 2012;265:893–901 doi:10.1148/radiol.12120422 pmid:22996749

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. Chiu AH,
    3. Cheung AK,
    4. Wenderoth JD, et al

    . Long-term follow-up results following elective treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1728–34 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4329 pmid:25999412

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Becske T,
    3. Potts MB,
    4. Shapiro M, et al

    . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: 3-year follow-up results. J Neurosurg 2017;127:81–88 doi:10.3171/2015.6.JNS15311 pmid:27739944

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    ClinicalTrials.gov. Multicenter Randomized Trial on Selective Endovascular Aneurysm Occlusion With Coils Versus Parent Vessel Reconstruction Using the SILK Flow Diverter (MARCO POLO PostMarket Clinical Investigation). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01084681. Accessed March 17, 2014
20. 20.↵
    ClinicalTrials.gov. A Randomized Trial Comparing Flow Diversion and Best-standard Treatment: the FIAT Trial. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01349582. Accessed January 20, 2016
21. 21.↵
    ClinicalTrials.gov. Multicenter Randomized Study for Medico-economic Evaluation of Embolization With Flow Diverter Stent in the Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Saccular Wide-necked Intracranial Aneurysms. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01811134. Accessed January 20, 2016
22. 22.↵
    ClinicalTrials.gov. Complete Occlusion of Coilable Aneurysms. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00777907. Accessed January 20, 2016
23. 23.↵
    2. Turfe ZA,
    3. Brinjikji W,
    4. Murad MH, et al

    . Endovascular coiling versus parent artery occlusion for treatment of cavernous carotid aneurysms: a meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:250–55 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011102 pmid:24658655

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Zhou Y,
    3. Yang P,
    4. Zhang Y, et al

    . Posterior cerebral artery-posterior communicating artery (PCA-PComA) aneurysms: report of five cases and literature review. Neurol India 2012;60:228–30 doi:10.4103/0028-3886.96409 pmid:22626709

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Arambepola PK,
    3. McEvoy SD,
    4. Bulsara KR

    . De novo aneurysm formation after carotid artery occlusion for cerebral aneurysms. Skull Base 2010;20:405–08 doi:10.1055/s-0030-1253578 pmid:21772796

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    2. Jafar JJ,
    3. Russell SM,
    4. Woo HH

    . Treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms with saphenous vein extracranial-to-intracranial bypass grafting: indications, operative technique, and results in 29 patients. Neurosurgery 2002;51:138–44; discussion 44–46 doi:10.1097/00006123-200207000-00021 pmid:12182411

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Spetzler RF,
    3. Schuster H,
    4. Roski RA

    . Elective extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass in the treatment of inoperable giant aneurysms of the internal carotid artery. J Neurosurg 1980;53:22–27 doi:10.3171/jns.1980.53.1.0022 pmid:7411205

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Morgan MK,
    3. Ferch RD,
    4. Little NS, et al

    . Bypass to the intracranial internal carotid artery. J Clin Neurosci 2002;9:418–24 doi:10.1054/jocn.2002.1127 pmid:12217671

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Tjoumakaris S,
    4. Starke RM, et al

    . Comparison of flow diversion and coiling in large unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2013;44:2150–54 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001785 pmid:23723311

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Murad MH,
    4. Lanzino G, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:442–47 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.678151 pmid:23321438

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Fargen KM,
    3. Hoh BL,
    4. Welch BG, et al

    . Long-term results of Enterprise stent-assisted coiling of cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2012;71:239–44; discussion 244 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182571953 pmid:22472556

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Hanel R,
    4. Lopes D, et al

    . International retrospective study of the Pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:108–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4111 pmid:25355814

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    2. Ye G,
    3. Zhang M,
    4. Deng L, et al

    . Meta-analysis of the efficiency and prognosis of intracranial aneurysm treated with flow diverter devices. J Mol Neurosci 2016;59:158–67 doi:10.1007/s12031-016-0723-x pmid:26816083

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Zhou Y,
    4. Yang P, et al

    . Comparison of the flow diverter and stent-assisted coiling in large and giant aneurysms: safety and efficacy based on a propensity score-matched analysis. Eur Radiol 2016;26:2369–77 doi:10.1007/s00330-015-4052-1 pmid:26471273

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Zhou G,
    3. Su M,
    4. Yin YL, et al

    . Complications associated with the use of flow-diverting devices for cerebral aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Focus 2017;42:E17 doi:10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS16450 pmid:28565981

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Derdeyn CP,
    3. Chimowitz MI,
    4. Lynn MJ, et al

    ; Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis Trial Investigators. Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial. Lancet 2014;383:333–41 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62038-3 pmid:24168957

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    2. Delgado Almandoz JE,
    3. Crandall BM,
    4. Scholz JM, et al

    . Last-recorded P2Y12 reaction units value is strongly associated with thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications occurring up to 6 months after treatment in patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:128–35 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3621 pmid:23828107

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    2. Skukalek SL,
    3. Winkler AM,
    4. Kang J, et al

    . Effect of antiplatelet therapy and platelet function testing on hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications in patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with the Pipeline embolization device: a review and meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:58–65 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011145 pmid:25385746

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.
    2. McAuliffe W,
    3. Wycoco V,
    4. Rice H, et al

    . Immediate and midterm results following treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:164–70 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2727 pmid:21979492

    Abstract/FREE Full Text