Prenatal Brain MR Imaging: Reference Linear Biometric Centiles between 20 and 24 Gestational Weeks

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Griffiths PD,
   3. Bradburn M,
   4. Campbell MJ, et al

   ; MERIDIAN collaborative group. Use of MRI in the diagnosis of fetal brain abnormalities in utero (MERIDIAN): a multicentre, prospective cohort study. Lancet 2017;389:538–46 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31723-8 pmid:27988140

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Conte G,
   3. Parazzini C,
   4. Falanga G, et al

   . Diagnostic value of prenatal MR imaging in the detection of brain malformations in fetuses before the 26th week of gestational age. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:946–51 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4639 pmid:26721771

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Tilea B,
   3. Alberti C,
   4. Adamsbaum C, et al

   . Cerebral biometry in fetal magnetic resonance imaging: new reference data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:173–81 doi:10.1002/uog.6276 pmid:19172662

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Ber R,
   3. Bar-Yosef O,
   4. Hoffmann C, et al

   . Normal fetal posterior fossa in MR imaging: new biometric data and possible clinical significance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:795–802 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4258 pmid:25655869

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Parazzini C,
   3. Righini A,
   4. Rustico M, et al

   . Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging: brain normal linear biometric values below 24 gestational weeks. Neuroradiology 2008;50:877–83 doi:10.1007/s00234-008-0421-7 pmid:18563404

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Kyriakopoulou V,
   3. Vatansever D,
   4. Davidson A, et al

   . Normative biometry of the fetal brain using magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Struct Funct 2017;222:2295–2307 doi:10.1007/s00429-016-1342-6 pmid:27885428

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Moreira NC,
   3. Teixeira J,
   4. Themudo R, et al

   . Measurements of the normal fetal brain at gestation weeks 17 to 23: a MRI study. Neuroradiology 2011;53:43–48 doi:10.1007/s00234-010-0772-8 pmid:20878397

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Clouchoux C,
   3. Guizard N,
   4. Evans AC, et al

   . Normative fetal brain growth by quantitative in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:173.e1–8 doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.10.002

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Corbett-Detig J,
   3. Habas PA,
   4. Scott JA, et al

   . 3D global and regional patterns of human fetal subplate growth determined in utero. Brain Struct Funct 2011;215:255–63 doi:10.1007/s00429-010-0286-5 pmid:21046152

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Limperopoulos C,
    3. Tworetzky W,
    4. McElhinney DB, et al

    . Brain volume and metabolism in fetuses with congenital heart disease: evaluation with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. Circulation 2010;121:26–33 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.865568 pmid:20026783

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Scott JA,
    3. Habas PA,
    4. Kim K, et al

    . Growth trajectories of the human fetal brain tissues estimated from 3D reconstructed in utero MRI. Int J Dev Neurosci 2011;29:529–36 doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2011.04.001 pmid:21530634

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Grossman R,
    3. Hoffman C,
    4. Mardor Y, et al

    . Quantitative MRI measurements of human fetal brain development in utero. Br J Anaesth 2006;33:463–70 pmid:16938471

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Woitek R,
    3. Dvorak A,
    4. Weber M, et al

    . MR-based morphometry of the posterior fossa in fetuses with neural tube defects of the spine. PLoS One 2014;9:e112585 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112585 pmid:25393279

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Garel C

    . Fetal cerebral biometry: normal parenchymal findings and ventricular size. Eur Radiol 2005;15:809–13 doi:10.1007/s00330-004-2610-z pmid:15726378

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Weir JP

    . Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 2005;19:231–40 pmid:15705040

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Cole TJ,
    3. Green PJ

    . Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelihood. Stat Med 1992;11:1305–19 doi:10.1002/sim.4780111005 pmid:1518992

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    2. D'Addario V,
    3. Pinto V,
    4. Del Bianco A, et al

    . The clivus-supraocciput angle: a useful measurement to evaluate the shape and size of the fetal posterior fossa and to diagnose Chiari II malformation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:146–49 doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00409.x pmid:11529995

    CrossRefPubMed