Resting-State Functional MRI: Everything That Nonexperts Have Always Wanted to Know

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Handwerker DA,
   3. Bandettini PA

   . Hemodynamic signals not predicted? Not so: a comment on Sirotin and Das> (2009). Neuroimage 2011;55:1409–12 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.037 pmid:20406693

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Sirotin YB,
   3. Das A

   . Anticipatory haemodynamic signals in sensory cortex not predicted by local neuronal activity. Nature 2009;457:475–79 doi:10.1038/nature07664 pmid:19158795

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Nasrallah FA,
   3. Yeow LY,
   4. Biswal B, et al

   . Dependence of BOLD signal fluctuation on arterial blood CO2 and O2: implication for resting-state functional connectivity. Neuroimage 2015;117:29–39 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.035 pmid:26003858

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Ogawa S,
   3. Lee TM,
   4. Kay AR, et al

   . Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990;87:9868–72 doi:10.1073/pnas.87.24.9868 pmid:2124706

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Kwong KK,
   3. Belliveau JW,
   4. Chesler DA, et al

   . Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:5675–79 doi:10.1073/pnas.89.12.5675 pmid:1608978

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Hyder F,
   3. Rothman DL

   . Neuronal correlate of BOLD signal fluctuations at rest: err on the side of the baseline. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:10773–74 doi:10.1073/pnas.1005135107 pmid:20534504

   FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Schölvinck ML,
   3. Maier A,
   4. Ye FQ, et al

   . Neural basis of global resting-state fMRI activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:10238–43 doi:10.1073/pnas.0913110107 pmid:20439733

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Biswal B,
   3. Yetkin FZ,
   4. Haughton VM, et al

   . Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:537–41 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910340409 pmid:8524021

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Smith K

   . Brain imaging: fMRI 2.0. Nature 2012;484:24–26 doi:10.1038/484024a pmid:22481337

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Hermes D,
    3. Nguyen M,
    4. Winawer J

    . Neuronal synchrony and the relation between the blood-oxygen-level dependent response and the local field potential. PLoS Biol 2017;15:e2001461 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2001461 pmid:28742093

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Koch C,
    3. Reid RC

    . Neuroscience: observatories of the mind. Nature 2012;483:397–98 doi:10.1038/483397a pmid:22437592

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Christen T,
    3. Jahanian H,
    4. Ni WW, et al

    . Noncontrast mapping of arterial delay and functional connectivity using resting-state functional MRI: a study in Moyamoya patients. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;41:424–30 doi:10.1002/jmri.24558 pmid:24419985

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Gawryluk JR,
    3. Mazerolle EL,
    4. D'Arcy RC

    . Does functional MRI detect activation in white matter? A review of emerging evidence, issues, and future directions. Front Neurosci 2014;8:239 doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00239 pmid:25152709

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Beissner F

    . Functional MRI of the brainstem: common problems and their solutions. Clin Neuroradiol 2015;25(Suppl 2):251–57 doi:10.1007/s00062-015-0404-0 pmid:25981409

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Wintermark M,
    3. Sanelli PC,
    4. Anzai Y, et al

    ; American College of Radiology Head Injury Institute. Imaging evidence and recommendations for traumatic brain injury: advanced neuro- and neurovascular imaging techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:E1–E11 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4181 pmid:25424870

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Mayer AR,
    3. Bellgowan PS,
    4. Hanlon FM

    . Functional magnetic resonance imaging of mild traumatic brain injury. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2014;49:8–18 doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.11.016 pmid:25434880

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Stevens MC,
    3. Lovejoy D,
    4. Kim J, et al

    . Multiple resting state network functional connectivity abnormalities in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Imaging Behav 2012;6:293–318 doi:10.1007/s11682-012-9157-4 pmid:22555821

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Ishaque M,
    3. Manning JH,
    4. Woolsey MD, et al

    . Functional integrity in children with anoxic brain injury from drowning. Hum Brain Mapp 2017;38:4813–31 doi:10.1002/hbm.23745 pmid:28759710

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Arngrim N,
    3. Hougaard A,
    4. Schytz HW, et al

    . Effect of hypoxia on BOLD fMRI response and total cerebral blood flow in migraine with aura patients. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2017 Jan 1. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1177/0271678X17719430 pmid:28686073

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Lv Y,
    3. Margulies DS,
    4. Cameron CR, et al

    . Identifying the perfusion deficit in acute stroke with resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 2013;73:136–40 doi:10.1002/ana.23763 pmid:23378326

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Amemiya S,
    3. Kunimatsu A,
    4. Saito N, et al

    . Cerebral hemodynamic impairment: assessment with resting-state functional MR imaging. Radiology 2014;270:548–55 doi:10.1148/radiol.13130982 pmid:24072777

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Korgaonkar MS,
    3. Ram K,
    4. Williams LM, et al

    . Establishing the resting state default mode network derived from functional magnetic resonance imaging tasks as an endophenotype: a twins study. Hum Brain Mapp 2014;35:3893–902 doi:10.1002/hbm.22446 pmid:24453120

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Smith K

    . Brain decoding: reading minds. Nature 2013;502:428–30 doi:10.1038/502428a pmid:24153277

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Williams LM

    . Defining biotypes for depression and anxiety based on large-scale circuit dysfunction: a theoretical review of the evidence and future directions for clinical translation. Depress Anxiety 2017;34:9–24 doi:10.1002/da.22556 pmid:27653321

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Khazaee A,
    3. Ebrahimzadeh A,
    4. Babajani-Feremi A

    . Classification of patients with MCI and AD from healthy controls using directed graph measures of resting-state fMRI. Brain Behav Res 2017;322:339–50 doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2016.06.043 pmid:27345822

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Schirner M,
    3. Rothmeier S,
    4. Jirsa VK, et al

    . An automated pipeline for constructing personalized virtual brains from multimodal neuroimaging data. Neuroimage 2015;117:343–57 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.055 pmid:25837600

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Chao-Gan Y,
    3. Yu-Feng Z

    . DPARSF: a MATLAB toolbox for “Pipeline” data analysis of resting-state fMRI. Front Syst Neurosci 2010;4:13 doi:10.3389/fnsys.2010.00013 pmid:20577591

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Dance A

    . Neuroscience: connectomes make the map. Nature 2015;526:147–49 doi:10.1038/526147a pmid:26432252

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Gao JH,
    4. Liotti M, et al

    . Temporal dissociation of parallel processing in the human subcortical outputs. Nature 1999;400:364–67 doi:10.1038/22547 pmid:10432114

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Tononi G,
    3. Sporns O,
    4. Edelman GM

    . A measure for brain complexity: relating functional segregation and integration in the nervous system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994;91:5033–37 doi:10.1073/pnas.91.11.5033 pmid:8197179

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Han L,
    3. Zhaohui L,
    4. Fei Y, et al

    . Disrupted neural activity in unilateral vascular pulsatile tinnitus patients in the early stage of disease: evidence from resting-state fMRI. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2015;59:91–99 doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2015.01.013 pmid:25645870

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Premi E,
    3. Cauda F,
    4. Gasparotti R, et al

    . Multimodal FMRI resting-state functional connectivity in granulin mutations: the case of fronto-parietal dementia. PLoS One 2014;9:e106500 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106500 pmid:25188321

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. An L,
    3. Cao QJ,
    4. Sui MQ, et al

    . Local synchronization and amplitude of the fluctuation of spontaneous brain activity in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a resting-state fMRI study. Neurosci Bull 2013;29:603–13 doi:10.1007/s12264-013-1353-8 pmid:23861089

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Lei D,
    3. Ma J,
    4. Du X, et al

    . Spontaneous brain activity changes in children with primary monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis: a resting-state fMRI study. Neurourol Urodyn 2012;31:99–104 doi:10.1002/nau.21205 pmid:22038619

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Zang YF,
    3. He Y,
    4. Zhu CZ, et al

    . Altered baseline brain activity in children with ADHD revealed by resting-state functional MRI. Brain Dev 2007;29:83–91 doi:10.1016/j.braindev.2006.07.002 pmid:16919409

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    2. Song XW,
    3. Dong ZY,
    4. Long XY, et al

    . REST: a toolkit for resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data processing. PLoS One 2011;6:e25031 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025031 pmid:21949842

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    2. Zou QH,
    3. Zhu CZ,
    4. Yang Y, et al

    . An improved approach to detection of Amplitude of Low-Frequency Fluctuation (ALFF) for resting-state fMRI: fractional ALFF. J Neurosci Methods 2008;172:137–41 doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.04.012 pmid:18501969

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    2. Buzsáki G,
    3. Draguhn A

    . Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks. Science 2004;304:1926–29 doi:10.1126/science.1099745 pmid:15218136

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    2. Zuo XN,
    3. Di Martino A,
    4. Kelly C, et al

    . The oscillating brain: complex and reliable. Neuroimage 2010;49:1432–45 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.037 pmid:19782143

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
40. 40.↵
    2. Xue SW,
    3. Li D,
    4. Weng XC, et al

    . Different neural manifestations of two slow frequency bands in resting functional magnetic resonance imaging: a systemic survey at regional, interregional, and network levels. Brain Connect 2014;4:242–55 doi:10.1089/brain.2013.0182 pmid:24456196

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    2. Liu X,
    3. Wang S,
    4. Zhang X, et al

    . Abnormal amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations of intrinsic brain activity in Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2014;40:387–97 doi:10.3233/JAD-131322 pmid:24473186

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. 42.↵
    2. Xue S,
    3. Wang X,
    4. Wang W, et al

    . Frequency-dependent alterations in regional homogeneity in major depression. Brain Behav Res 2016;306:13–19 doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2016.03.012 pmid:26968135

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    2. Chen X,
    3. Zhang H,
    4. Zhang L, et al

    . Extraction of dynamic functional connectivity from brain grey matter and white matter for MCI classification. Hum Brain Mapp 2017;38:5019–34 doi:10.1002/hbm.23711 pmid:28665045

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    2. Zhang L,
    3. Zhang H,
    4. Chen X, et al

    . Learning-based structurally-guided construction of resting-state functional correlation tensors. Magn Reson Imaging 2017;43:110–21 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2017.07.008 pmid:28729016

    CrossRefPubMed
45. 45.↵
    2. Küblböck M,
    3. Woletz M,
    4. Höflich A, et al

    . Stability of low-frequency fluctuation amplitudes in prolonged resting-state fMRI. Neuroimage 2014;103:249–57 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.038 pmid:25251869

    CrossRefPubMed
46. 46.↵
    2. Zuo XN,
    3. Xing XX

    . Test-retest reliabilities of resting-state FMRI measurements in human brain functional connectomics: a systems neuroscience perspective. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2014;45:100–18 doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.05.009 pmid:24875392

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    2. Zang Y,
    3. Jiang T,
    4. Lu Y, et al

    . Regional homogeneity approach to fMRI data analysis. Neuroimage 2004;22:394–400 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.030 pmid:15110032

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
48. 48.↵
    2. Zang YF,
    3. Zuo XN,
    4. Milham M, et al

    . Toward a meta-analytic synthesis of the resting-state fMRI literature for clinical populations. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:435265 doi:10.1155/2015/435265 pmid:26171391

    CrossRefPubMed
49. 49.↵
    2. Song X,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. Liu Y

    . Frequency specificity of regional homogeneity in the resting-state human brain. PLoS One 2014;9:e86818 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086818 pmid:24466256

    CrossRefPubMed
50. 50.↵
    2. Liu ZR,
    3. Miao HH,
    4. Yu Y, et al

    . Frequency-specific local synchronization changes in paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e3293 doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000003293 pmid:27043701

    CrossRefPubMed
51. 51.↵
    2. Huang Z,
    3. Wang Z,
    4. Zhang J, et al

    . Altered temporal variance and neural synchronization of spontaneous brain activity in anesthesia. Hum Brain Mapp 2014;35:5368–78 doi:10.1002/hbm.22556 pmid:24867379

    CrossRefPubMed
52. 52.↵
    2. Yu R,
    3. Hsieh MH,
    4. Wang HL, et al

    . Frequency dependent alterations in regional homogeneity of baseline brain activity in schizophrenia. PLoS One 2013;8:e57516 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057516 pmid:23483911

    CrossRefPubMed
53. 53.↵
    2. Zuo XN,
    3. Xu T,
    4. Jiang L, et al

    . Toward reliable characterization of functional homogeneity in the human brain: preprocessing, scan duration, imaging resolution and computational space. Neuroimage 2013;65:374–86 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.017 pmid:23085497

    CrossRefPubMed
54. 54.↵
    2. Cui Y,
    3. Jiao Y,
    4. Chen YC, et al

    . Altered spontaneous brain activity in type 2 diabetes: a resting-state functional MRI study. Diabetes 2014;63:749–60 doi:10.2337/db13-0519 pmid:24353185

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
55. 55.↵
    2. Premi E,
    3. Cauda F,
    4. Gasparotti R, et al

    . Multimodal fMRI resting-state functional connectivity in granulin mutations: the case of fronto-parietal dementia. PLoS One 2014;9:e106500 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106500 pmid:25188321

    CrossRefPubMed
56. 56.↵
    2. Lanting CP,
    3. de Kleine E,
    4. Langers DR, et al

    . Unilateral tinnitus: changes in connectivity and response lateralization measured with fMRI. PLoS One 2014;9:e110704 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110704 pmid:25329557

    CrossRefPubMed
57. 57.↵
    2. Friston KJ

    . Modalities, modes, and models in functional neuroimaging. Science 2009;326:399–403 doi:10.1126/science.1174521 pmid:19833961

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
58. 58.↵
    2. Tomasi D,
    3. Volkow ND

    . Functional connectivity density mapping. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:9885–90 doi:10.1073/pnas.1001414107 pmid:20457896

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
59. 59.↵
    2. Achard S,
    3. Salvador R,
    4. Whitcher B, et al

    . A resilient, low-frequency, small-world human brain functional network with highly connected association cortical hubs. J Neurosci 2006;26:63–72 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3874-05.2006 pmid:16399673

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
60. 60.↵
    2. He Y,
    3. Chen ZJ,
    4. Evans AC

    . Small-world anatomical networks in the human brain revealed by cortical thickness from MRI. Cereb Cortex 2007;17:2407–19 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl149 pmid:17204824

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
61. 61.↵
    2. Xia M,
    3. Wang J,
    4. He Y

    . BrainNet Viewer: a network visualization tool for human brain connectomics. PLoS One 2013;8:e68910 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068910 pmid:23861951

    CrossRefPubMed
62. 62.↵
    2. Lee MH,
    3. Smyser CD,
    4. Shimony JS

    . Resting-state fMRI: a review of methods and clinical applications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1866–72 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3263 pmid:22936095

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
63. 63.↵
    2. Wilson PH,
    3. Smits-Engelsman B,
    4. Caeyenberghs K, et al

    . Cognitive and neuroimaging findings in developmental coordination disorder: new insights from a systematic review of recent research. Dev Med Child Neurol 2017;59:1117–29 doi:10.1111/dmcn.13530 pmid:28872667

    CrossRefPubMed
64. 64.↵
    2. Koyama MS,
    3. Parvaz MA,
    4. Goldstein RZ

    . The adolescent brain at risk for substance use disorders: a review of functional MRI research on motor response inhibition. Curr Opin Behav Sci 2017;13:186–95 doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.12.006 pmid:28868337

    CrossRefPubMed
65. 65.↵
    2. Gravel N,
    3. Harvey BM,
    4. Renken RJ, et al

    . Phase-synchronization-based parcellation of resting state fMRI signals reveals topographically organized clusters in early visual cortex. Neuroimage 2017 Sep 1. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.063 pmid:28867341

    CrossRefPubMed
66. 66.↵
    2. Kiviniemi V,
    3. Kantola JH,
    4. Jauhiainen J, et al

    . Independent component analysis of nondeterministic fMRI signal sources. Neuroimage 2003;19:253–60 doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00097-1 pmid:12814576

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
67. 67.↵
    2. van de Ven VG,
    3. Formisano E,
    4. Prvulovic D, et al

    . Functional connectivity as revealed by spatial independent component analysis of fMRI measurements during rest. Hum Brain Mapp 2004;22:165–78 doi:10.1002/hbm.20022 pmid:15195284

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
68. 68.↵
    2. Beckmann CF,
    3. DeLuca M,
    4. Devlin JT, et al

    . Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2005;360:1001–13 doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1634 pmid:16087444

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
69. 69.↵
    2. Shirer WR,
    3. Ryali S,
    4. Rykhlevskaia E, et al

    . Decoding subject-driven cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns. Cereb Cortex 2012;22:158–65 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr099 pmid:21616982

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
70. 70.↵
    2. Seeley WW,
    3. Menon V,
    4. Schatzberg AF, et al

    . Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. J Neurosci 2007;27:2349–56 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5587-06.2007 pmid:17329432

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
71. 71.↵
    2. Zuo XN,
    3. Kelly C,
    4. Adelstein JS, et al

    . Reliable intrinsic connectivity networks: test-retest evaluation using ICA and dual regression approach. Neuroimage 2010;49:2163–77 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.080 pmid:19896537

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
72. 72.↵
    2. Bertolero MA,
    3. Yeo BT,
    4. D'Esposito M

    . The modular and integrative functional architecture of the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015;112:E6798–807 doi:10.1073/pnas.1510619112 pmid:26598686

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
73. 73.↵
    2. Anderson M,
    3. Fu GS,
    4. Phlypo R, et al

    . Independent vector analysis: identification conditions and performance bounds. IEEE Trans Signal Process 2014;62:4399–410 doi:10.1109/TSP.2014.2333554

    CrossRef
74. 74.↵
    2. Lee JH,
    3. Lee TW,
    4. Jolesz FA, et al

    . Independent vector analysis (IVA): multivariate approach for fMRI group study. Neuroimage 2008;40:86–109 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.11.019 pmid:18165105

    CrossRefPubMed
75. 75.↵
    2. Anderson M,
    3. Adali T,
    4. Li XL

    . Joint blind source separation with multivariate Gaussian model: algorithms and performance analysis. IEEE Trans Signal Process 2012;60:1672–83
76. 76.↵
    2. Laney J,
    3. Westlake KP,
    4. Ma S, et al

    . Capturing subject variability in fMRI data: a graph-theoretical analysis of GICA vs. IVA. J Neurosci Methods 2015;247:32–40 doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.03.019 pmid:25797843

    CrossRefPubMed
77. 77.↵
    2. Ma S,
    3. Phlypo R,
    4. Calhoun VD, et al

    . Capturing group variability using IVA: a simulation study and graph-theoretical analysis. Proc IEEE Int Conf Acoust Speech Signal Process 2013:3128–32 doi:10.1109/ICASSP.2013.6638234

    CrossRef
78. 78.↵
    2. Allen EA,
    3. Erhardt EB,
    4. Wei Y, et al

    . Capturing inter-subject variability with group independent component analysis of fMRI data: a simulation study. Neuroimage 2012;59:4141–59 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.010 pmid:22019879

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
79. 79.↵
    2. Watts DJ,
    3. Strogatz SH

    . Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 1998;393:440–42 doi:10.1038/30918 pmid:9623998

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
80. 80.↵
    2. Liao X,
    3. Vasilakos AV,
    4. He Y

    . Small-world human brain networks: perspectives and challenges. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2017;77:286–300 doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.03.018 pmid:28389343

    CrossRefPubMed
81. 81.↵
    2. Bullmore E,
    3. Sporns O

    . Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009;10:186–98 doi:10.1038/nrn2575 pmid:19190637

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
82. 82.↵
    2. Sporns O,
    3. Honey CJ,
    4. Kotter R

    . Identification and classification of hubs in brain networks. PLoS One 2007;2:e1049 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001049 pmid:17940613

    CrossRefPubMed
83. 83.↵
    2. van den Heuvel MP,
    3. Stam CJ,
    4. Boersma M, et al

    . Small-world and scale-free organization of voxel-based resting-state functional connectivity in the human brain. Neuroimage 2008;43:528–39 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.010 pmid:18786642

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
84. 84.↵
    2. Achard S,
    3. Bullmore E

    . Efficiency and cost of economical brain functional networks. PLoS Comput Biol 2007;3:e17 doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030017 pmid:17274684

    CrossRefPubMed
85. 85.↵
    2. Glasser MF,
    3. Coalson TS,
    4. Robinson EC, et al

    . A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex. Nature 2016;536:171–78 doi:10.1038/nature18933 pmid:27437579

    CrossRefPubMed
86. 86.↵
    2. Zalesky A,
    3. Fornito A,
    4. Harding IH, et al

    . Whole-brain anatomical networks: does the choice of nodes matter? Neuroimage 2010;50:970–83 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.027 pmid:20035887

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
87. 87.↵
    2. Li W,
    3. Andreasen NC,
    4. Nopoulos P, et al

    . Automated parcellation of the brain surface generated from magnetic resonance images. Front Neuroinform 2013;7:23 doi:10.3389/fninf.2013.00023 pmid:24155718

    CrossRefPubMed
88. 88.↵
    2. Wang J,
    3. Wang X,
    4. Xia M, et al

    . GRETNA: a graph theoretical network analysis toolbox for imaging connectomics. Front Hum Neurosci 2015;9:386 doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00386 pmid:26175682

    CrossRefPubMed
89. 89.↵
    2. Menon V

    . Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: a unifying triple network model. Trends Cogn Sci 2011;15:483–506 doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.003 pmid:21908230

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
90. 90.↵
    2. Calhoun VD,
    3. Miller R,
    4. Pearlson G, et al

    . The chronnectome: time-varying connectivity networks as the next frontier in fMRI data discovery. Neuron 2014;84:262–74 doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.015 pmid:25374354

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
91. 91.↵
    2. Griffa A,
    3. Ricaud B,
    4. Benzi K, et al

    . Transient networks of spatio-temporal connectivity map communication pathways in brain functional systems. Neuroimage 2017;155:490–502 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.015 pmid:28412440

    CrossRefPubMed
92. 92.↵
    2. Abrol A,
    3. Damaraju E,
    4. Miller RL, et al

    . Replicability of time-varying connectivity patterns in large resting state fMRI samples. Neuroimage 2017;163:160–76 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.020 pmid:28916181

    CrossRefPubMed
93. 93.↵
    2. Abrol A,
    3. Chaze C,
    4. Damaraju E, et al

    . The chronnectome: evaluating replicability of dynamic connectivity patterns in 7500 resting fMRI datasets. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2016;2016:5571–74 doi:10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591989 pmid:28269517

    CrossRefPubMed
94. 94.↵
    2. Thompson WH,
    3. Fransson P

    . The frequency dimension of fMRI dynamic connectivity: network connectivity, functional hubs and integration in the resting brain. Neuroimage 2015;121:227–42 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.022 pmid:26169321

    CrossRefPubMed
95. 95.↵
    2. Chen Y,
    3. Wang W,
    4. Zhao X, et al

    . Age-related decline in the variation of dynamic functional connectivity: a resting state analysis. Front Aging Neurosci 2017;9:203 doi:10.3389/fnagi.2017.00203 pmid:28713261

    CrossRefPubMed
96. 96.↵
    2. Park BY,
    3. Moon T,
    4. Park H

    . Dynamic functional connectivity analysis reveals improved association between brain networks and eating behaviors compared to static analysis. Brain Behav Res 2018;337:114–21 doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2017.10.001 pmid:28986105

    CrossRefPubMed
97. 97.↵
    2. Cheng JC,
    3. Bosma RL,
    4. Hemington KS, et al

    . Slow-5 dynamic functional connectivity reflects the capacity to sustain cognitive performance during pain. Neuroimage 2017;157:61–68 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.005 pmid:28583880

    CrossRefPubMed
98. 98.↵
    2. Damaraju E,
    3. Allen EA,
    4. Belger A, et al

    . Dynamic functional connectivity analysis reveals transient states of dysconnectivity in schizophrenia. Neuroimage Clin 2014;5:298–308 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2014.07.003 pmid:25161896

    CrossRefPubMed
99. 99.↵
    2. Hutchison RM,
    3. Womelsdorf T,
    4. Allen EA, et al

    . Dynamic functional connectivity: promise, issues, and interpretations. Neuroimage 2013;80:360–78 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.079 pmid:23707587

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
100. 100.↵
     2. Preti MG,
     3. Bolton TA,
     4. Van De Ville D

     . The dynamic functional connectome: state-of-the-art and perspectives. Neuroimage 2017;160:41–54 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.061 pmid:28034766

     CrossRefPubMed
101. 101.↵
     2. Lindquist MA,
     3. Xu Y,
     4. Nebel MB, et al

     . Evaluating dynamic bivariate correlations in resting-state fMRI: a comparison study and a new approach. Neuroimage 2014;101:531–46 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.052 pmid:24993894

     CrossRefPubMed