Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleAdult Brain
Open Access

Brain Perfusion Measurements Using Multidelay Arterial Spin-Labeling Are Systematically Biased by the Number of Delays

M. van der Thiel, C. Rodriguez, P. Giannakopoulos, M.X. Burke, R. Marc Lebel, N. Gninenko, D. Van De Ville and S. Haller
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2018, 39 (8) 1432-1438; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5717
M. van der Thiel
aFrom the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Geneva (M.v.d.T., P.G., N.G., D.v.d.V., S.H.), Geneva, Switzerland
bInstitute of Bioengineering (M.v.d.T., N.G., D.v.d.V.), School of Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. van der Thiel
C. Rodriguez
cDivision of Institutional Measures (C.R., P.G.), Medical Direction, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for C. Rodriguez
P. Giannakopoulos
aFrom the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Geneva (M.v.d.T., P.G., N.G., D.v.d.V., S.H.), Geneva, Switzerland
cDivision of Institutional Measures (C.R., P.G.), Medical Direction, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P. Giannakopoulos
M.X. Burke
fGE Healthcare (M.X.B., M.L.), Little Chalfont, UK.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.X. Burke
R. Marc Lebel
fGE Healthcare (M.X.B., M.L.), Little Chalfont, UK.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R. Marc Lebel
N. Gninenko
aFrom the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Geneva (M.v.d.T., P.G., N.G., D.v.d.V., S.H.), Geneva, Switzerland
bInstitute of Bioengineering (M.v.d.T., N.G., D.v.d.V.), School of Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for N. Gninenko
D. Van De Ville
aFrom the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Geneva (M.v.d.T., P.G., N.G., D.v.d.V., S.H.), Geneva, Switzerland
bInstitute of Bioengineering (M.v.d.T., N.G., D.v.d.V.), School of Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D. Van De Ville
S. Haller
aFrom the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Geneva (M.v.d.T., P.G., N.G., D.v.d.V., S.H.), Geneva, Switzerland
dAffidea Centre de Diagnostic Radiologique de Carouge (S.H.), Geneva, Switzerland
eDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Radiology (S.H.), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. Haller
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Seven pulsed continuous arterial spin-labeling periods of different durations: labeling duration (LD) = 0.22, 0.26, 0.30, 0.37, 0.48, 0.68, and 1.18 seconds was used to acquire perfusion-weighted images at postlabeling delays of 1.00, 1.22, 1.48, 1.78, 2.15, 2.62, and 3.32 seconds. When we used only 3 labeling periods, LD = 0.57, 0.89, 2.04 seconds and PLD = 1.00, 1.57, and 2.46 seconds.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    A, The spatial distribution of the differences between the 7-delay sequence and the 3-delay sequence for the uncorrected and corrected flow maps. The higher estimation value for the 7-delay over the 3-delay sequences is presented in the areas corresponding to the watershed areas (yellow). The 7-delay CBF estimates were found to be half the value of the 3-delay transit time–corrected flow maps within the right insular region of the brain and frontal regions (blue). The transit time–corrected maps show a higher value for the 7-delay over the 3-delay sequence in the regions overlapping the uncorrected maps. However, the transit time–uncorrected maps show a broader signal for the difference between the 2 sequences, including more posterior regions of the brain. B, The average estimated transit-uncorrected flow and the transit-corrected flow in milliliters/minute/100 g for the 7-delay and 3-delay sequences within the voxels that displayed a significantly higher estimate for the 7-delay sequences. For these voxels, an average perfusion value of 27.62 ± 12.23 is estimated by the 7-delay versus 24.58 ± 11.70 mL/min/100 g for the 3-delay sequences in the uncorrected maps, and a perfusion value of 33.48 ± 14.92 is estimated by the 7-delay versus 30.16 ± 14.32 mL/min/100 g for the 3-delay sequences of the corrected flow maps.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    A, The spatial distribution of the differences between the 7-delay sequence and the 3-delay sequence for the delay maps. The estimation of the 7-delay as inferior to the 3-delay sequence (blue) concerns peripheral areas of the brain. In contrast, within the central regions of the brain, the averaged transit-time estimates are longer for the 7-delay sequences compared with the 3-delay sequences (red). B, The average estimated transit time delay in milliseconds of the voxels that displayed a significantly higher estimate for the 7-delay and those that showed a higher estimate for the 3-delay, respectively. This figure shows the difference between the 7-delay and the 3-delay within these corresponding regions. For the regions where the 7-delay estimated a smaller arterial transit time delay than the 3-delay sequence, an average arterial transit time of 1.47755 ± 0.24242 seconds is found for the 7-delay versus 1.52408 ± 0.25236 seconds for the 3-delay. Regions with a longer arterial transit time delay for the 7-delay compared to 3-delay resulted in an average arterial transit time estimation of 1.42565 ± 0.21872 seconds by the 7-delay sequence and 1.39388 ± 0.22056 seconds by the 3-delay sequences for the transit-time delay.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    A, The spatial distribution of the differences between the uncorrected and corrected flow maps for the 7-delay and 3-delay sequences. On average, the transit-corrected flow maps provided a higher value for both the 7-delay and 3-delay compared with the corresponding uncorrected flow maps across the entire brain. B, The average estimated transit-uncorrected flow and the transit-corrected flow in milliliters/minute/100 g within the voxels that showed a significantly higher estimate for the transit-corrected sequences than for the 7-delay and the 3-delay sequences. This figure shows the difference between the uncorrected and corrected maps. The 7-delay sequences estimated a mean perfusion value of 28.60 ± 11.91 mL/min/100 g for the uncorrected versus 34.56 ± 13.58 mL/min/100 g for the corrected flow maps. For the 3-delay sequences, the uncorrected flow map resulted in an average perfusion estimation of 26.38 ± 11.74 mL/min/100 g versus the corrected map of 32.78 ± 13.44 mL/min/100 g. The corrected flow maps estimate for both sequences almost an additional 20% of the perfusion value of the uncorrected flow maps.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 39 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 39, Issue 8
1 Aug 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Brain Perfusion Measurements Using Multidelay Arterial Spin-Labeling Are Systematically Biased by the Number of Delays
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
M. van der Thiel, C. Rodriguez, P. Giannakopoulos, M.X. Burke, R. Marc Lebel, N. Gninenko, D. Van De Ville, S. Haller
Brain Perfusion Measurements Using Multidelay Arterial Spin-Labeling Are Systematically Biased by the Number of Delays
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2018, 39 (8) 1432-1438; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5717

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Brain Perfusion Measurements Using Multidelay Arterial Spin-Labeling Are Systematically Biased by the Number of Delays
M. van der Thiel, C. Rodriguez, P. Giannakopoulos, M.X. Burke, R. Marc Lebel, N. Gninenko, D. Van De Ville, S. Haller
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2018, 39 (8) 1432-1438; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5717
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology of Monoclonal Antibodies
  • Cerebral ADC Changes in Fabry Disease
  • ML for Glioma Molecular Subtype Prediction
Show more Adult Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire