Review of the Imaging Features of Benign Osteoporotic and Malignant Vertebral Compression Fractures

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Melton LJ 3rd.

   . Epidemiology of spinal osteoporosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997;22:2S–11S doi:10.1097/00007632-199712151-00002 pmid:9431638

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Coleman RE

   . Skeletal complications of malignancy. Cancer 1997;80:1588–94 pmid:9362426

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Porter BA,
   3. Shields AF,
   4. Olson DO

   . Magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow disorders. Radiol Clin North Am 1986;24:269–89 pmid:3715001

   PubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Yamato M,
   3. Nishimura G,
   4. Kuramochi E, et al

   . MR appearance at different ages of osteoporotic compression fractures of the vertebrae. Radiat Med 1998;16:329–34 pmid:9862153

   PubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Zhuang H,
   3. Sam JW,
   4. Chacko TK, et al

   . Rapid normalization of osseous FDG uptake following traumatic or surgical fractures. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:1096–103 doi:10.1007/s00259-003-1198-x pmid:12761597

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Lecouvet FE,
   3. Malghem J,
   4. Michaux L, et al

   . Vertebral compression fractures in multiple myeloma, Part II: assessment of fracture risk with MR imaging of spinal bone marrow. Radiology 1997;204:201–05 doi:10.1148/radiology.204.1.9205247 pmid:9205247

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Lecouvet FE,
   3. Vande Berg BC,
   4. Maldague BE, et al

   . Vertebral compression fractures in multiple myeloma, Part I: distribution and appearance at MR imaging. Radiology 1997;204:195–99 doi:10.1148/radiology.204.1.9205246 pmid:9205246

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Layton KF,
   3. Thielen KR,
   4. Cloft HJ, et al

   . Acute vertebral compression fractures in patients with multiple myeloma: evaluation of vertebral body edema patterns on MR imaging and the implications for vertebroplasty. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1732–34 pmid:16971624

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Abdel-Wanis ME,
   3. Solyman MT,
   4. Hasan NM

   . Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating vertebral compression fractures caused by malignancy, osteoporosis, and infections. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2011;19:145–50 doi:10.1177/230949901101900203 pmid:21857034

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Yuzawa Y,
    3. Ebara S,
    4. Kamimura M, et al

    . Magnetic resonance and computed tomography-based scoring system for the differential diagnosis of vertebral fractures caused by osteoporosis and malignant tumors. J Orthop Sci 2005;10:345–52 doi:10.1007/s00776-005-0910-z pmid:16075165

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Moulopoulos LA,
    3. Yoshimitsu K,
    4. Johnston DA, et al

    . MR prediction of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:667–74 doi:10.1002/jmri.1880060416 pmid:8835961

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Cuénod CA,
    3. Laredo JD,
    4. Chevret S, et al

    . Acute vertebral collapse due to osteoporosis or malignancy: appearance on unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MR images. Radiology 1996;199:541–49 doi:10.1148/radiology.199.2.8668809 pmid:8668809

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Shih TT,
    3. Huang KM,
    4. Li YW

    . Solitary vertebral collapse: distinction between benign and malignant causes using MR patterns. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:635–42 pmid:10331758

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Jung HS,
    3. Jee WH,
    4. McCauley TR, et al

    . Discrimination of metastatic from acute osteoporotic compression spinal fractures with MR imaging. Radiographics 2003;23:179–87 doi:10.1148/rg.231025043 pmid:12533652

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Rupp RE,
    3. Ebraheim NA,
    4. Coombs RJ

    . Magnetic resonance imaging differentiation of compression spine fractures or vertebral lesions caused by osteoporosis or tumor. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:2499–503; discussion 2504 doi:10.1097/00007632-199512000-00007 pmid:8610244

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Tan DY,
    3. Tsou IY,
    4. Chee TS

    . Differentiation of malignant vertebral collapse from osteoporotic and other benign causes using magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2002;31:8–14 pmid:11885502

    PubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Yuh WT,
    3. Zachar CK,
    4. Barloon TJ, et al

    . Vertebral compression fractures: distinction between benign and malignant causes with MR imaging. Radiology 1989;172:215–18 doi:10.1148/radiology.172.1.2740506 pmid:2740506

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Thawait SK,
    3. Marcus MA,
    4. Morrison WB, et al

    . Research synthesis: what is the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging to discriminate benign from malignant vertebral compression fractures? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:E736–44 doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182458cac pmid:22210011

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Thawait SK,
    3. Kim J,
    4. Klufas RA, et al

    . Comparison of four prediction models to discriminate benign from malignant vertebral compression fractures according to MRI feature analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:493–502 doi:10.2214/AJR.11.7192 pmid:23436836

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Kaplan PA,
    3. Orton DF,
    4. Asleson RJ

    . Osteoporosis with vertebral compression fractures, retropulsed fragments, and neurologic compromise. Radiology 1987;165:533–35 doi:10.1148/radiology.165.2.3659378 pmid:3659378

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Ishiyama M,
    3. Fuwa S,
    4. Numaguchi Y, et al

    . Pedicle involvement on MR imaging is common in osteoporotic compression fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:668–73 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1905 pmid:20019106

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Lehman VT,
    3. Wood CP,
    4. Hunt CH, et al

    . Facet joint signal change on MRI at levels of acute/subacute lumbar compression fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1468–73 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3449 pmid:23449650

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Kim DH,
    3. Rosenblum JK,
    4. Panghaal VS, et al

    . Differentiating neoplastic from nonneoplastic processes in the anterior extradural space. Radiology 2011;260:825–30 doi:10.1148/radiol.11102287 pmid:21555353

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Baker LL,
    3. Goodman SB,
    4. Perkash I, et al

    . Benign versus pathologic compression fractures of vertebral bodies: assessment with conventional spin-echo, chemical-shift, and STIR MR imaging. Radiology 1990;174:495–502 doi:10.1148/radiology.174.2.2296658 pmid:2296658

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Dammers R,
    3. Bijvoet HW,
    4. Driesse MJ, et al

    . Occurrence of malignant vertebral fractures in an emergency room setting. Emerg Med J 2007;24:707–09 doi:10.1136/emj.2007.051375 pmid:17901272

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Baur A,
    3. Stäbler A,
    4. Arbogast S, et al

    . Acute osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral compression fractures: fluid sign at MR imaging. Radiology 2002;225:730–35 doi:10.1148/radiol.2253011413 pmid:12461253

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Castillo M,
    3. Arbelaez A,
    4. Smith JK, et al

    . Diffusion-weighted MR imaging offers no advantage over routine noncontrast MR imaging in the detection of vertebral metastases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:948–53 pmid:10815675

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. An HS,
    3. Andreshak TG,
    4. Nguyen C, et al

    . Can we distinguish between benign versus malignant compression fractures of the spine by magnetic resonance imaging? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:1776–82 doi:10.1097/00007632-199508150-00005 pmid:7502133

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Ishiyama M,
    3. Numaguchi Y,
    4. Makidono A, et al

    . Contrast-enhanced MRI for detecting intravertebral cleft formation: relation to the time since onset of vertebral fracture. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:W117–23 doi:10.2214/AJR.12.9621 pmid:23789683

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Raya JG,
    3. Dietrich O,
    4. Reiser MF, et al

    . Methods and applications of diffusion imaging of vertebral bone marrow. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:1207–20 doi:10.1002/jmri.20748 pmid:17075841

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    2. Baur A,
    3. Stabler A,
    4. Huber A, et al

    . Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of spinal bone marrow. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2001;5:35–42 doi:10.1055/s-2001-12921 pmid:11371334

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Baur A,
    3. Stäbler A,
    4. Brüning R, et al

    . Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow: differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures. Radiology 1998;207:349–56 doi:10.1148/radiology.207.2.9577479 pmid:9577479

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    2. Zhou XJ,
    3. Leeds NE,
    4. McKinnon GC, et al

    . Characterization of benign and metastatic vertebral compression fractures with quantitative diffusion MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:165–70 pmid:11827890

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    2. Tang G,
    3. Liu Y,
    4. Li W, et al

    . Optimization of b value in diffusion-weighted MRI for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant vertebral fractures. Skeletal Radiol 2007;36:1035–41 doi:10.1007/s00256-007-0358-7 pmid:17786434

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Baur A,
    3. Huber A,
    4. Ertl-Wagner B, et al

    . Diagnostic value of increased diffusion weighting of a steady-state free precession sequence for differentiating acute benign osteoporotic fractures from pathologic vertebral compression fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:366–72 pmid:11156785

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    2. Baur-Melnyk A

    . Malignant versus benign vertebral collapse: are new imaging techniques useful? Cancer Imaging 2009;9 Spec No A:S49–51 doi:10.1102/1470-7330.2009.901 pmid:19965294

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    2. Karchevsky M,
    3. Babb JS,
    4. Schweitzer ME

    . Can diffusion-weighted imaging be used to differentiate benign from pathologic fractures? A meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol 2008;37:791–95 doi:10.1007/s00256-008-0503-y pmid:18551290

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    2. Park SW,
    3. Lee JH,
    4. Ehara S, et al

    . Single shot fast spin echo diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the spine; is it useful in differentiating malignant metastatic tumor infiltration from benign fracture edema? Clin Imaging 2004;28:102–08 doi:10.1016/S0899-7071(03)00247-X pmid:15050221

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    2. Biffar A,
    3. Baur-Melnyk A,
    4. Schmidt GP, et al

    . Quantitative analysis of the diffusion-weighted steady-state free precession signal in vertebral bone marrow lesions. Invest Radiol 2011;46:601–09 doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e31821e637d pmid:21610504

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    2. Mubarak F,
    3. Akhtar W

    . Acute vertebral compression fracture: differentiation of malignant and benign causes by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Pak Med Assoc 2011;61:555–58 pmid:22204209

    PubMed
41. 41.↵
    2. Wonglaksanapimon S,
    3. Chawalparit O,
    4. Khumpunnip S, et al

    . Vertebral body compression fracture: discriminating benign from malignant causes by diffusion-weighted MR imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient value. J Med Assoc Thai 2012;95:81–87 pmid:22379746

    PubMed
42. 42.↵
    2. Sung JK,
    3. Jee WH,
    4. Jung JY, et al

    . Differentiation of acute osteoporotic and malignant compression fractures of the spine: use of additive qualitative and quantitative axial diffusion-weighted MR imaging to conventional MR imaging at 3.0 T. Radiology 2014;271:488–98 doi:10.1148/radiol.13130399 pmid:24484060

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    2. Park HJ,
    3. Lee SY,
    4. Rho MH, et al

    . Single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR imaging at 3T and 1.5T for differentiation of benign vertebral fracture edema and tumor infiltration. Korean J Radiol 2016;17:590–97 doi:10.3348/kjr.2016.17.5.590 pmid:27587948

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    2. Luo Z,
    3. Litao L,
    4. Gu S, et al

    . Standard-b-value vs low-b-value DWI for differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral fractures: a meta-analysis. Br J Radiol 2016;89:20150384 doi:10.1259/bjr.20150384 pmid:26612466

    CrossRefPubMed
45. 45.↵
    2. Dietrich O,
    3. Geith T,
    4. Reiser MF, et al

    . Diffusion imaging of the vertebral bone marrow. NMR Biomed 2017;30 doi:10.1002/nbm.3333 pmid:26114411

    CrossRefPubMed
46. 46.↵
    2. Rumpel H,
    3. Chong Y,
    4. Porter DA, et al

    . Benign versus metastatic vertebral compression fractures: combined diffusion-weighted MRI and MR spectroscopy aids differentiation. Eur Radiol 2013;23:541–50 doi:10.1007/s00330-012-2620-1 pmid:22903620

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    2. Chen WT,
    3. Shih TT,
    4. Chen RC, et al

    . Blood perfusion of vertebral lesions evaluated with gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MRI: in comparison with compression fracture and metastasis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;15:308–14 doi:10.1002/jmri.10063 pmid:11891976

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
48. 48.↵
    2. Arevalo-Perez J,
    3. Peck KK,
    4. Lyo JK, et al

    . Differentiating benign from malignant vertebral fractures using T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;42:1039–47 doi:10.1002/jmri.24863 pmid:25656545

    CrossRefPubMed
49. 49.↵
    2. Geith T,
    3. Biffar A,
    4. Schmidt G, et al

    . Quantitative analysis of acute benign and malignant vertebral body fractures using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:W635–43 doi:10.2214/AJR.12.9351 pmid:23701095

    CrossRefPubMed
50. 50.↵
    2. Tokuda O,
    3. Hayashi N,
    4. Taguchi K, et al

    . Dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging of diseased vertebrae: analysis of three parameters and the distribution of the time-intensity curve patterns. Skeletal Radiol 2005;34:632–38 doi:10.1007/s00256-005-0949-0 pmid:16091963

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
51. 51.↵
    2. Erly WK,
    3. Oh ES,
    4. Outwater EK

    . The utility of in-phase/opposed-phase imaging in differentiating malignancy from acute benign compression fractures of the spine. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1183–88 pmid:16775260

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
52. 52.↵
    2. Zajick DC Jr.,
    3. Morrison WB,
    4. Schweitzer ME, et al

    . Benign and malignant processes: normal values and differentiation with chemical shift MR imaging in vertebral marrow. Radiology 2005;237:590–96 doi:10.1148/radiol.2372040990 pmid:16244268

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
53. 53.↵
    2. Ogura A,
    3. Hayakawa K,
    4. Maeda F, et al

    . Differential diagnosis of vertebral compression fracture using in-phase/opposed-phase and short TI inversion recovery imaging. Acta Radiol 2012;53:450–55 doi:10.1258/ar.2012.110524 pmid:22416260

    CrossRefPubMed
54. 54.↵
    2. Laredo JD,
    3. Lakhdari K,
    4. Bellaïche L, et al

    . Acute vertebral collapse: CT findings in benign and malignant nontraumatic cases. Radiology 1995;194:41–48 doi:10.1148/radiology.194.1.7997579 pmid:7997579

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
55. 55.↵
    2. Kubota T,
    3. Yamada K,
    4. Ito H, et al

    . High-resolution imaging of the spine using multidetector-row computed tomography: differentiation between benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005;29:712–19 doi:10.1097/01.rct.0000175500.41836.24 pmid:16163049

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
56. 56.↵
    2. Wang KC,
    3. Jeanmenne A,
    4. Weber GM, et al

    . An online evidence-based decision support system for distinguishing benign from malignant vertebral compression fractures by magnetic resonance imaging feature analysis. J Digit Imaging 2011;24:507–15 doi:10.1007/s10278-010-9316-3 pmid:20680384

    CrossRefPubMed
57. 57.↵
    2. Bredella MA,
    3. Essary B,
    4. Torriani M, et al

    . Use of FDG-PET in differentiating benign from malignant compression fractures. Skeletal Radiol 2008;37:405–13 doi:10.1007/s00256-008-0452-5 pmid:18278491

    CrossRefPubMed
58. 58.↵
    2. Shin DS,
    3. Shon OJ,
    4. Byun SJ, et al

    . Differentiation between malignant and benign pathologic fractures with F-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Skeletal Radiol 2008;37:415–21 doi:10.1007/s00256-008-0462-3 pmid:18309481

    CrossRefPubMed
59. 59.↵
    2. Cho WI,
    3. Chang UK

    . Comparison of MR imaging and FDG-PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures. J Neurosurg Spine 2011;14:177–83 doi:10.3171/2010.10.SPINE10175 pmid:21214309

    CrossRefPubMed
60. 60.↵
    2. Aggarwal A,
    3. Salunke P,
    4. Shekhar BR, et al

    . The role of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography-computed tomography combined in differentiating benign from malignant lesions contributing to vertebral compression fractures. Surg Neurol Int 2013;4:S323–26 doi:10.4103/2152-7806.112619 pmid:23878766

    CrossRefPubMed
61. 61.↵
    2. Ravenel JG,
    3. Gordon LL,
    4. Pope TL, et al

    . FDG-PET uptake in occult acute pelvic fracture. Skeletal Radiol 2004;33:99–101 doi:10.1007/s00256-003-0711-4 pmid:14605771

    CrossRefPubMed
62. 62.↵
    2. Shon IH,
    3. Fogelman I

    . F-18 FDG positron emission tomography and benign fractures. Clin Nucl Med 2003;28:171–75 doi:10.1097/01.RLU.0000053508.98025.01 pmid:12592121

    CrossRefPubMed
63. 63.↵
    2. Tokuda O,
    3. Harada Y,
    4. Ueda T, et al

    . Malignant versus benign vertebral compression fractures: can we use bone SPECT as a substitute for MR imaging? Nucl Med Commun 2011;32:192–98 doi:10.1097/MNM.0b013e3283425665 pmid:21150808

    CrossRefPubMed