Comparison of a Photon-Counting-Detector CT with an Energy-Integrating-Detector CT for Temporal Bone Imaging: A Cadaveric Study

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Zayas JO,
   3. Feliciano YZ,
   4. Hadley CR, et al

   . Temporal bone trauma and the role of multidetector CT in the emergency department. Radiographics 2011;31:1741–55 doi:10.1148/rg.316115506 pmid:21997992

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Lane JI,
   3. Lindell EP,
   4. Witte RJ, et al

   . Middle and inner ear: improved depiction with multiplanar reconstruction of volumetric CT data. Radiographics 2006;26:115–24 doi:10.1148/rg.261055703 pmid:16418247

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Majdani O,
   3. Thews K,
   4. Bartling S, et al

   . Temporal bone imaging: comparison of flat panel volume CT and multisection CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1419–24 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1560 pmid:19369606

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Jäger L,
   3. Bonell H,
   4. Liebl M, et al

   . CT of the normal temporal bone: comparison of multi- and single-detector row CT. Radiology 2005;235:133–41 doi:10.1148/radiol.2351020895 pmid:15703310

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Goldfeld M,
   3. Glaser B,
   4. Nassir E, et al

   . CT of the ear in Pendred syndrome. Radiology 2005;235:537–40 doi:10.1148/radiol.2352031583 pmid:15758191

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Flohr TG,
   3. Stierstorfer K,
   4. Süss C, et al

   . Novel ultrahigh resolution data acquisition and image reconstruction for multi-detector row CT. Med Phys 2007;34:1712–23 pmid:17555253

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. McCollough CH,
   3. Leng S,
   4. Sunnegardh J, et al

   . Spatial resolution improvement and dose reduction potential for inner ear CT imaging using a z-axis deconvolution technique. Med Phys 2013;40:061904 doi:10.1118/1.4802730 pmid:23718595

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Meyer M,
   3. Haubenreisser H,
   4. Raupach R, et al

   . Initial results of a new generation dual source CT system using only an in-plane comb filter for ultra-high-resolution temporal bone imaging. Eur Radiol 2015;25:178–85 doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3406-4 pmid:25194708

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Leng S,
   3. Diehn FE,
   4. Lane JI, et al

   . Temporal bone CT: improved image quality and potential for decreased radiation dose using an ultra-high-resolution scan mode with an iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1599–603 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4338 pmid:25999413

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Gupta R,
    3. Grasruck M,
    4. Suess C, et al

    . Ultra-high resolution flat-panel volume CT: fundamental principles, design architecture, and system characterization. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1191–205 doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0156-y pmid:16528556

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Kalender WA,
    3. Kyriakou Y

    . Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT). Eur Radiol 2007;17:2767–79 doi:10.1007/s00330-007-0651-9 pmid:17587058

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Kappler S,
    3. Hannemann T,
    4. Kraft E, et al

    . First results from a hybrid prototype CT scanner for exploring benefits of quantum-counting in clinical CT. Proc SPIE 2012;8313:30 doi:10.1117/12.911295

    CrossRef
13. 13.↵
    2. Kappler S,
    3. Henning A,
    4. Kreisler B, et al

    . Photon counting CT at elevated X-ray tube currents: contrast stability, image noise and multi-energy performance. Proc SPIE 2014;9033:90331C doi:10.1117/12.2043511

    CrossRef
14. 14.↵
    2. Yu Z,
    3. Leng S,
    4. Jorgensen SM, et al

    . Evaluation of conventional imaging performance in a research whole-body CT system with a photon-counting detector array. Phys Med Biol 2016;61:1572–95 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/61/4/1572 pmid:26835839

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Schlomka JP,
    3. Roessl E,
    4. Dorscheid R, et al

    . Experimental feasibility of multi-energy photon-counting K-edge imaging in pre-clinical computed tomography. Phys Med Biol 2008;53:4031–47 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/53/15/002 pmid:18612175

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Pourmorteza A,
    3. Symons R,
    4. Sandfort V, et al

    . Abdominal imaging with contrast-enhanced photon-counting CT: first human experience. Radiology 2016;279:239–45 doi:10.1148/radiol.2016152601 pmid:26840654

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Shikhaliev PM

    . Energy-resolved computed tomography: first experimental results. Phys Med Biol 2008;53:5595–613 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/53/20/002 pmid:18799830

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Iwanczyk JS,
    3. Nygard E,
    4. Meirav O, et al

    . Photon counting energy dispersive detector arrays for X-ray imaging. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2009;56:535–42 doi:10.1109/TNS.2009.2013709 pmid:19920884

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Taguchi K,
    3. Iwanczyk JS

    . Vision 20/20: single photon counting x-ray detectors in medical imaging. Med Phys 2013;40:100901 doi:10.1118/1.4820371 pmid:24089889

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Symons R,
    3. Pourmorteza A,
    4. Sandfort V, et al

    . Feasibility of dose-reduced chest CT with photon-counting detectors: initial results in humans. Radiology 2017;285:980–89 doi:10.1148/radiol.2017162587 pmid:28753389

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Pourmorteza A,
    3. Symons R,
    4. Reich D, et al

    . Photon-counting CT of the brain: in vivo human results and image-quality assessment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:2257–63 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5402 pmid:28982793

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Symons R,
    3. Reich DS,
    4. Bagheri M, et al

    . Photon-counting computed tomography for vascular imaging of the head and neck: first in vivo human results. Invest Radiol 2018;53:135–42 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000418 pmid:28926370

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Leng S,
    3. Yu Z,
    4. Halaweish A, et al

    . Dose-efficient ultrahigh-resolution scan mode using a photon counting detector computed tomography system. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2016;3:043504 doi:10.1117/1.JMI.3.4.043504 pmid:28042589

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Zhou W,
    3. Montoya J,
    4. Gutjahr R, et al

    . Lung nodule volume quantification and shape differentiation with an ultra-high-resolution technique on a photon counting detector CT system. In: Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging 2017: Physics of Medical Imaging. Orlando, Florida; June 5, 2017
25. 25.↵
    2. Schardt P,
    3. Deuringer J,
    4. Freudenberger J, et al

    . New x-ray tube performance in computed tomography by introducing the rotating envelope tube technology. Med Phys 2004;31:2699–706 doi:10.1118/1.1783552 pmid:15487753

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Schuknecht H

    . Pathology of the Ear. Boston: Harvard University Press; 1975
27. 27.↵
    2. Norweck JT,
    3. Seibert JA,
    4. Andriole KP, et al

    . ACR-AAPM-SIIM technical standard for electronic practice of medical imaging. J Digit Imaging 2013;26:38–52 doi:10.1007/s10278-012-9522-2 pmid:22992866

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Landis JR,
    3. Koch GG

    . Measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74 doi:10.2307/2529310 pmid:843571

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Leng S,
    3. Gutjahr R,
    4. Ferrero AF, et al

    . Ultra-high spatial resolution, multi-energy CT using photon counting detector technology. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt 2017;10132:101320Y doi:10.1117/12.2255589

    CrossRef
30. 30.↵
    2. Caldemeyer KS,
    3. Sandrasegaran K,
    4. Shinaver CN, et al

    . Temporal bone: comparison of isotropic helical CT and conventional direct axial and coronal CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:1675–82 doi:10.2214/ajr.172.6.10350314 pmid:10350314

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Nieman K,
    3. Cademartiri F,
    4. Lemos PA, et al

    . Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2002;106:2051–54 doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000037222.58317.3D pmid:12379572

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. Petrou M,
    3. Quint LE,
    4. Nan B, et al

    . Pulmonary nodule volumetric measurement variability as a function of CT slice thickness and nodule morphology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:306–12 doi:10.2214/AJR.05.1063 pmid:17242235

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    2. Kawel N,
    3. Seifert B,
    4. Luetolf M, et al

    . Effect of slab thickness on the CT detection of pulmonary nodules: use of sliding thin-slab maximum intensity projection and volume rendering. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:1324–29 doi:10.2214/AJR.08.1689 pmid:19380557

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Kakinuma R,
    3. Moriyama N,
    4. Muramatsu Y, et al

    . Ultra-high-resolution computed tomography of the lung: image quality of a prototype scanner. PLoS One 2015;10:e0137165 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137165 pmid:26352144

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Glastonbury CM,
    3. Davidson HC,
    4. Harnsberger HR, et al

    . Imaging findings of cochlear nerve deficiency. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:635–43 pmid:11950658

    Abstract/FREE Full Text