Feasibility of a Synthetic MR Imaging Sequence for Spine Imaging

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Liao C,
   3. Bilgic B,
   4. Manhard MK, et al

   . 3D MR fingerprinting with accelerated stack-of-spirals and hybrid sliding-window and GRAPPA reconstruction. Neuroimage 2017;162:13–22 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.030 pmid:28842384

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   European Society of Radiology (ESR). Magnetic resonance fingerprinting: a promising new approach to obtain standardized imaging biomarkers from MRI. Insights Imaging 2015;6:163–65 doi:10.1007/s13244-015-0403-3 pmid:25800993

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Hagiwara A,
   3. Warntjes M,
   4. Hori M, et al

   . SyMRI of the brain: rapid quantification of relaxation rates and proton density, with synthetic MRI, automatic brain segmentation, and myelin measurement. Invest Radiol 2017;52:647–57 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000365 pmid:28257339

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Blystad I,
   3. Warntjes JB,
   4. Smedby O, et al

   . Synthetic MRI of the brain in a clinical setting. Acta Radiol 2012;53:1158–63 doi:10.1258/ar.2012.120195 pmid:23024181

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Lee SM,
   3. Choi YH,
   4. You SK, et al

   . Age-related changes in tissue value properties in children: simultaneous quantification of relaxation times and proton density using synthetic magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2018;53:236–45 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000435 pmid:29504952

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Lee SM,
   3. Choi YH,
   4. Cheon JE, et al

   . Image quality at synthetic brain magnetic resonance imaging in children. Pediatr Radiol 2017;47:1638–47 doi:10.1007/s00247-017-3913-y pmid:28638982

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. McAllister A,
   3. Leach J,
   4. West H, et al

   . Quantitative synthetic MRI in children: normative intracranial tissue segmentation values during development. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:2364–72 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5398 pmid:28982788

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Warntjes JB,
   3. Leinhard OD,
   4. West J, et al

   . Rapid magnetic resonance quantification on the brain: optimization for clinical usage. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:320–29 doi:10.1002/mrm.21635 pmid:18666127

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Tanenbaum LN,
   3. Tsiouris AJ,
   4. Johnson AN, et al

   . Synthetic MRI for clinical neuroimaging: results of the Magnetic Resonance Image Compilation (MAGiC) prospective, multicenter, multireader trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1103–10 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5227 pmid:28450439

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Granberg T,
    3. Uppman M,
    4. Hashim F, et al

    . Clinical feasibility of synthetic MRI in multiple sclerosis: a diagnostic and volumetric validation study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1023–29 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4665 pmid:26797137

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Hagiwara A,
    3. Andica C,
    4. Hori M, et al

    . Synthetic MRI showed increased myelin partial volume in the white matter of a patient with Sturge-Weber syndrome. Neuroradiology 2017;59:1065–66 doi:10.1007/s00234-017-1908-x pmid:28844080

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Betts AM,
    3. Leach JL,
    4. Jones BV, et al

    . Brain imaging with synthetic MR in children: clinical quality assessment. Neuroradiology 2016;58:1017–26 doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1723-9 pmid:27438803

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. West H,
    3. Leach JL,
    4. Jones BV, et al

    . Clinical validation of synthetic brain MRI in children: initial experience. Neuroradiology 2017;59:43–50 doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1765-z pmid:27889836

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Park S,
    3. Kwack KS,
    4. Lee YJ, et al

    . Initial experience with synthetic MRI of the knee at 3T: comparison with conventional T1 weighted imaging and T2 mapping. Br J Radiol 2017;90:20170350 doi:10.1259/bjr.20170350 pmid:28934866

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Yi J,
    3. Lee YH,
    4. Song HT, et al

    . Clinical feasibility of synthetic magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of internal derangements of the knee. Korean J Radiol 2018;19:311–19 doi:10.3348/kjr.2018.19.2.311 pmid:29520189

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Boudabbous S,
    3. Neroladaki A,
    4. Bagetakos I, et al

    . Feasibility of synthetic MRI in knee imaging in routine practice. Acta Radiol Open 2018;7:2058460118769686 doi:10.1177/2058460118769686 pmid:29780615

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Whittall KP,
    3. MacKay AL,
    4. Li DK

    . Are mono-exponential fits to a few echoes sufficient to determine T2 relaxation for in vivo human brain? Magn Reson Med 1999;41:1255–57 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1522-2594(199906)41:6<1255::AID-MRM23>3.0.CO%3B2-I pmid:10371459

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Vargas MI,
    3. Boto J,
    4. Delatre BM

    . Synthetic MR imaging sequence in daily clinical practice. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016 Jul 21. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4895 pmid:27444944

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Drake-Pérez M,
    3. Delattre BM,
    4. Boto J, et al

    . Normal values of magnetic relaxation parameters of spine components with the synthetic MRI sequence. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:788–95 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5566 pmid:29496723

    Abstract/FREE Full Text