Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticlePediatric Neuroimaging
Open Access

Cesarean Delivery Impacts Infant Brain Development

S.C. Deoni, S.H. Adams, X. Li, T.M. Badger, R.T. Pivik, C.M. Glasier, R.H. Ramakrishnaiah, A.C. Rowell and X. Ou
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2019, 40 (1) 169-177; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5887
S.C. Deoni
eSchool of Engineering (S.C.D.), Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S.C. Deoni
S.H. Adams
aFrom the Arkansas Children's Nutrition Center (S.H.A., T.M.B., R.T.P., X.O.), Little Rock, Arkansas
cPediatrics (S.H.A., T.M.B., R.T.P., C.M.G., X.O.), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S.H. Adams
X. Li
bDepartments of Radiology (X.L., C.M.G., R.H.R., A.C.R., X.O.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for X. Li
T.M. Badger
aFrom the Arkansas Children's Nutrition Center (S.H.A., T.M.B., R.T.P., X.O.), Little Rock, Arkansas
cPediatrics (S.H.A., T.M.B., R.T.P., C.M.G., X.O.), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for T.M. Badger
R.T. Pivik
aFrom the Arkansas Children's Nutrition Center (S.H.A., T.M.B., R.T.P., X.O.), Little Rock, Arkansas
cPediatrics (S.H.A., T.M.B., R.T.P., C.M.G., X.O.), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R.T. Pivik
C.M. Glasier
bDepartments of Radiology (X.L., C.M.G., R.H.R., A.C.R., X.O.)
cPediatrics (S.H.A., T.M.B., R.T.P., C.M.G., X.O.), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
dArkansas Children's Research Institute (C.M.G., R.H.R., A.C.R., X.O.), Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for C.M. Glasier
R.H. Ramakrishnaiah
bDepartments of Radiology (X.L., C.M.G., R.H.R., A.C.R., X.O.)
dArkansas Children's Research Institute (C.M.G., R.H.R., A.C.R., X.O.), Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R.H. Ramakrishnaiah
A.C. Rowell
bDepartments of Radiology (X.L., C.M.G., R.H.R., A.C.R., X.O.)
dArkansas Children's Research Institute (C.M.G., R.H.R., A.C.R., X.O.), Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A.C. Rowell
X. Ou
aFrom the Arkansas Children's Nutrition Center (S.H.A., T.M.B., R.T.P., X.O.), Little Rock, Arkansas
bDepartments of Radiology (X.L., C.M.G., R.H.R., A.C.R., X.O.)
cPediatrics (S.H.A., T.M.B., R.T.P., C.M.G., X.O.), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
dArkansas Children's Research Institute (C.M.G., R.H.R., A.C.R., X.O.), Little Rock, Arkansas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for X. Ou
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    DTI TBSS results for the comparison of FA values between 2-week-old neonates born by cesarean delivery or vaginal delivery in cohort 1. Green represents major white matter tracts in the brain; orange shows voxels that have different FA values between groups. A, Group differences (P < .05, corrected for the voxelwise multiple comparisons) when no covariates were added. B, Group differences (P < .05, corrected for the voxelwise multiple comparisons) when 3 demographic parameters that were different between groups (gestational weight gain, infant sex, and birth length) were added as covariates. C, Trend of group differences (P < .15, corrected for the voxelwise multiple comparisons) when an additional 2 potential confounders (gestational age at MR imaging and maternal BMI at early pregnancy) were included as covariates. D, Illustration of ROIs (red outlined) selected for further post hoc analysis. E, Group comparison of mean FA values in these white matter ROIs. L indicates left; R, right; ACR, anterior corona radiata; ALIC, anterior limb of internal capsule; PLIC, posterior limb of internal capsule; AF, arcuate fasciculus; BCC, body of the corpus callosum; SAF, short association fibers; SCR, superior corona radiata; asterisk, P < .05 without controlling for covariates; double asterisks, P < .05 with and without controlling for covariates.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Resting-sate fMRI analyses of functional connectivity in the DMN in 2-week-old neonates in cohort 1. A, The DMN for vaginal and cesarean delivery groups obtained from respective independent component analysis (ICA). B, Regions in which the vaginal delivery group had higher functional connectivity (z score) in the DMN than the cesarean delivery group (P < .05, corrected for the voxelwise multiple comparisons) when excluding or including potential confounders as covariates. C, Illustration of ROI (precuneus selected) for further post hoc analysis. D, Comparison of the mean z score values in the precuneus between the 2 groups. Double asterisks indicate P < .05 with and without controlling for covariates.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Longitudinal MWF in different brain regions for the vaginal delivery (blue) and cesarean delivery (green) groups in cohort 3. Children born by vaginal delivery had higher MWF (indicative of better white matter development) in most of the brain regions at young infancy, while the differences between groups gradually disappeared with age.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Illustration of a hypothetic model for mechanisms that drive differences in brains between infants with vaginal birth and cesarean delivery. Under this model, birth mode–associated changes to the gut microbiome lead to alterations in signals to the brain that regulate normal remodeling processes. Because microglia are implicated in this process, the model emphasizes this cell type as a major player in cell-cell cross-talk (red arrows) that modifies overall brain structure and function during the neonatal period. The model provides a theoretic framework for how birth mode contributes to normal neonatal brain development. The figure was generated, in part, by using components from the Servier Medical Art Powerpoint image bank (https://smart.servier.com/), which is under an open-use Creative Commons license.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Study population demographics for cohort 1—two-week-old neonates (n = 43)

    Vaginal Delivery (Mean ± SD) (n = 32)Cesarean Delivery (Mean ± SD) (n = 11)P Value
    DTI TBSS study (n = 43)3211
    RS-fMRI study (n = 37)2710
    Mother's age at delivery (yr)29.0 ± 3.930.6 ± 4.4.26
    29.2 ± 4.130.6 ± 4.6.35
    Mother's body fat % at early/prepregnancy33.4 ± 8.636.9 ± 8.5.24
    34.5 ± 8.838.4 ± 7.3.23
    Mother's BMI at 12 wk of pregnancy25.1 ± 5.228.8 ± 5.1.04
    25.5 ± 5.529.2 ± 5.1.08
    Mother's gestational weight gain (kg)11.79 ± 3.079.02 ± 3.37.02c
    11.51 ± 2.758.87 ± 3.51.03c
    Mother's IQa107.7 ± 9.6104.2 ± 6.9.18
    108.6 ± 9.2104.8 ± 6.9.22
    Gestational age at MRIb (days)290 ± 6287 ± 6.20
    291 ± 6288 ± 5.22
    Sex (M/F)20/123/8.04c
    19/83/7.03c
    Birth weight (kg)3.51 ± 0.463.56 ± 0.54.79
    3.49 ± 0.363.63 ± 0.52.35
    Birth length (cm)51.1 ± 2.649.3 ± 2.6.05c
    51.2 ± 2.149.3 ± 2.7.02c
    Head circumference (cm)36.2 ± 1.135.9 ± 0.5.22
    36.3 ± 0.935.9 ± 0.6.31
    Diet for the first 2 wk (breastmilk/formula)29/310/1.98
    24/39/1.92
    • For each cell in the table, the first row is for the DTI TBSS study, the second row is for the RS-fMRI study.

    • ↵a Not available for 1 subject with vaginal delivery.

    • ↵b Defined as gestational age at birth plus postnatal age at MRI.

    • ↵c Consistently different between groups for both TBSS and RF-fMRI and therefore included as a covariate in the analysis.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Study population demographics for cohort 2—eight-year-olds (n = 60)

    Vaginal Delivery (n = 37)Cesarean Delivery (n = 23)P Value
    DTI TBSS study (n = 56)3521
    VBM study (n = 57)3621
    Birth weight (mean ± SD) (kg)3.37 ± 0.403.44 ± 0.49.79
    3.34 ± 0.433.45 ± 0.48.55
    Gestational age at birth (mean ± SD) (days)276 ± 9275 ± 9.43
    275 ± 10274 ± 10.75
    Age at MRI (mean ± SD) (yr)7.93 ± 0.267.87 ± 0.24.42
    7.94 ± 0.267.92 ± 0.27.94
    Sex (M/F)13/2211/10.26
    14/229/12.77
    Infant diet (breastmilk/formula)14/214/17.10
    15/214/17.08
    BMI (mean ± SD)16.8 ± 2.917.1 ± 2.3.49
    16.7 ± 2.917.4 ± 2.8.27
    SESa mother's education: high school/college/graduate degree4/15/82/5/3.99
    SESa father's education: high school/college/graduate degree7/17/33/6/1.99
    SESa mother's annual income: NA/<$20k/$20k–$50k/>$50k12/5/9/11/2/3/4.03
    SESa father's annual income: NA/<$20k/$20k–$50k/>$50k1/0/11/150/0/3/7.79
    IQ (mean ± SD)110 ± 10112 ± 17.53
    112 ± 11112 ± 16.72
    CELF-4 language scores (mean ± SD)b103 ± 14104 ± 16.31
    103 ± 12105 ± 14.24
    CMS general memory index (mean ± SD)b113 ± 12109 ± 13.14
    115 ± 11111 ± 13.24
    • Note:—SES indicates socioeconomic status; CELF-4, Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals; CMS, Childhood Memory Scale; NA, not applicable. For each cell in the table, the first row is for the DTI TBSS study, the second row is for the VBM study.

    • ↵a Only partial socioeconomic status data were available for all subjects (n = 27 for vaginal delivery, n = 10 for cesarean delivery).

    • ↵b Not available for 1 subject with cesarean delivery.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Study population demographics for cohort 3—three-month- to 5-year-olds (n = 203)

    Vaginal Delivery (Mean ± SD)Cesarean Delivery (Mean ± SD)P Value
    MWF study (n = 203)16439
    Mother's post-secondary education (yr)5.8 ± 1.06.0 ± 0.9.22
    Mother's age at pregnancy (yr)29.0 ± 5.633.8 ± 5.1<.001
    Sex (M/F)93/7123/16.86
    Gestational age at birth (days)277 ± 8273 ± 4.001
    Birth weight (kg)3.54 ± 0.453.37 ± 0.48.06
    Birth length (cm)50.8 ± 4.150.8 ± 4.1.63
    No. of scans2.2 ± 1.22.4 ± 1.3.32
    Mean interscan period (days)296 ± 144333 ± 147.12
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 40 (1)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 40, Issue 1
1 Jan 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cesarean Delivery Impacts Infant Brain Development
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
S.C. Deoni, S.H. Adams, X. Li, T.M. Badger, R.T. Pivik, C.M. Glasier, R.H. Ramakrishnaiah, A.C. Rowell, X. Ou
Cesarean Delivery Impacts Infant Brain Development
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2019, 40 (1) 169-177; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5887

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Cesarean Delivery Impacts Infant Brain Development
S.C. Deoni, S.H. Adams, X. Li, T.M. Badger, R.T. Pivik, C.M. Glasier, R.H. Ramakrishnaiah, A.C. Rowell, X. Ou
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2019, 40 (1) 169-177; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5887
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • FRACTURE MR in Congenital Vertebral Anomalies
  • Comparing MRI Perfusion in Pediatric Brain Tumors
  • Sodium MRI in Pediatric Brain Tumors
Show more Pediatric Neuroimaging

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire