Absence of Disproportionately Enlarged Subarachnoid Space Hydrocephalus, a Sharp Callosal Angle, or Other Morphologic MRI Markers Should Not Be Used to Exclude Patients with Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus from Shunt Surgery

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Mori E,
   3. Ishikawa M,
   4. Kato T, et al

   ; Japanese Society of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: second edition. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2012;52:775–809 doi:10.2176/nmc.52.775 pmid:23183074

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Relkin N,
   3. Marmarou A,
   4. Klinge P, et al

   . Diagnosing idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 2005;57(3 Suppl):S4–16; discussion ii-v pmid:16160425

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Blomsterwall E,
   3. Svantesson U,
   4. Carlsson U, et al

   . Postural disturbance in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurol Scand 2000;102:284–91 doi:10.1034/j.1600-0404.2000.102005284.x pmid:11083504

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Hellström P,
   3. Klinge P,
   4. Tans J, et al

   . A new scale for assessment of severity and outcome in iNPH. Acta Neurol Scand 2012;126:229–37 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2012.01677.x pmid:22587624

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Agerskov S,
   3. Hellström P,
   4. Andrén K, et al

   . The phenotype of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a single center study of 429 patients. J Neurol Sci 2018;391:54–60 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2018.05.022 pmid:30103972

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Adams RD,
   3. Fisher CM,
   4. Hakim S, et al

   . Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal-fluid pressure: a treatable syndrome. N Engl J Med 1965;273:117–26 doi:10.1056/NEJM196507152730301 pmid:14303656

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Kockum K,
   3. Lilja-Lund O,
   4. Larsson EM, et al

   . The idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus Radscale: a radiological scale for structured evaluation. Eur J Neurol 2018;25:569–76 doi:10.1111/ene.13555 pmid:29281156

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Virhammar J,
   3. Laurell K,
   4. Cesarini KG, et al

   . Preoperative prognostic value of MRI findings in 108 patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2311–18 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4046 pmid:25012669

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Wikkelsö C,
   3. Andersson H,
   4. Blomstrand C, et al

   . Computed tomography of the brain in the diagnosis of and prognosis in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neuroradiology 1989;31:160–65 doi:10.1007/BF00698846 pmid:2747894

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Kazui H,
    3. Mori E,
    4. Ohkawa S, et al

    . Predictors of the disappearance of triad symptoms in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus after shunt surgery. J Neurol Sci 2013;328:64–69 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2013.02.020 pmid:23510566

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Halperin JJ,
    3. Kurlan R,
    4. Schwalb JM, et al

    . Practice guideline: idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus—response to shunting and predictors of response: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2015;85:2063–71 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002193 pmid:26644048

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Craven CL,
    3. Toma AK,
    4. Mostafa T, et al

    . The predictive value of DESH for shunt responsiveness in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Clin Neurosci 2016;34:294–98 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2016.09.004 pmid:27692614

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Hashimoto M,
    3. Ishikawa M,
    4. Mori E, et al

    ; Study of INPH on neurological improvement (SINPHONI). Diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus is supported by MRI-based scheme: a prospective cohort study. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 2010;7:18 doi:10.1186/1743-8454-7-18 pmid:21040519

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Garcia-Armengol R,
    3. Domenech S,
    4. Botella-Campos C, et al

    . Comparison of elevated intracranial pressure pulse amplitude and disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space (DESH) for prediction of surgical results in suspected idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016;158:2207–13 doi:10.1007/s00701-016-2858-5 pmid:27349896

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Shinoda N,
    3. Hirai O,
    4. Hori S, et al

    . Utility of MRI-based disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus scoring for predicting prognosis after surgery for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: clinical research. J Neurosurg 2017;127:1436–42 doi:10.3171/2016.9.JNS161080 pmid:28156249

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Virhammar J,
    3. Laurell K,
    4. Cesarini KG, et al

    . The callosal angle measured on MRI as a predictor of outcome in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 2014;120:178–84 doi:10.3171/2013.8.JNS13575 pmid:24074491

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Steffen TM,
    3. Hacker TA,
    4. Mollinger L

    . Age- and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: Six-Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up & Go Test, and gait speeds. Phys Ther 2002;82:128–37 doi:10.1093/ptj/82.2.128 pmid:11856064

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Podsiadlo D,
    3. Richardson S

    . The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991;39:142–48 doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x pmid:1991946

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Tullberg M,
    3. Rosengren L,
    4. Blomsterwall E, et al

    . CSF neurofilament and glial fibrillary acidic protein in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurology 1998;50:1122–27 doi:10.1212/WNL.50.4.1122 pmid:9566405

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Solana E,
    3. Poca MA,
    4. Sahuquillo J, et al

    . Cognitive and motor improvement after retesting in normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a real change or merely a learning effect? J Neurosurg 2010;112:399–409 doi:10.3171/2009.4.JNS081664 pmid:19480539

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Ishii K,
    3. Kanda T,
    4. Harada A, et al

    . Clinical impact of the callosal angle in the diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Eur Radiol 2008;18:2678–83 doi:10.1007/s00330-008-1044-4 pmid:18500524

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Kitagaki H,
    3. Mori E,
    4. Ishii K, et al

    . CSF spaces in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: morphology and volumetry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1277–84 pmid:9726467

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Algin O,
    3. Hakyemez B,
    4. Taskapilioglu O, et al

    . Morphologic features and flow void phenomenon in normal pressure hydrocephalus and other dementias: are they really significant? Acad Radiol 2009;16:1373–80 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2009.06.010 pmid:19717316

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Fazekas F,
    3. Chawluk JB,
    4. Alavi A, et al

    . MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer's dementia and normal aging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;149:351–56 doi:10.2214/ajr.149.2.351 pmid:3496763

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Virhammar J,
    3. Laurell K,
    4. Cesarini KG, et al

    . Increase in callosal angle and decrease in ventricular volume after shunt surgery in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 2018 Feb 2:1–6. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.3171/2017.8.JNS17547 pmid:29393749

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Benedetto N,
    3. Gambacciani C,
    4. Aquila F, et al

    . A new quantitative method to assess disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space (DESH) in patients with possible idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: the SILVER index. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2017;158:27–32 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.04.015 pmid:28448824

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Wilson JT,
    3. Hareendran A,
    4. Hendry A, et al

    . Reliability of the modified Rankin Scale across multiple raters: benefits of a structured interview. Stroke 2005;36:777–81 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000157596.13234.95 pmid:15718510

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Ishikawa M,
    3. Oowaki H,
    4. Takezawa M, et al

    . Disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus and its implication in pathogenesis. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2016;122:287–90 doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22533-3_57 pmid:27165923

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Jurcoane A,
    3. Keil F,
    4. Szelenyi A, et al

    . Directional diffusion of corticospinal tract supports therapy decisions in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neuroradiology 2014;56:5–13 doi:10.1007/s00234-013-1289-8 pmid:24158631

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Lee PH,
    3. Yong SW,
    4. Ahn YH, et al

    . Correlation of midbrain diameter and gait disturbance in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol 2005;252:958–63 doi:10.1007/s00415-005-0791-2 pmid:15834647

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    2. Tullberg M,
    3. Jensen C,
    4. Ekholm S, et al

    . Normal pressure hydrocephalus: vascular white matter changes on MR images must not exclude patients from shunt surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1665–73 pmid:11673159

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. Ziegelitz D,
    3. Starck G,
    4. Kristiansen D, et al

    . Cerebral perfusion measured by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI is reduced in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;39:1533–42 doi:10.1002/jmri.24292 pmid:24006249

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Ziegelitz D,
    3. Arvidsson J,
    4. Hellström P, et al

    . In patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus postoperative cerebral perfusion changes measured by dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging correlate with clinical improvement. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2015;39:531–40 doi:10.1097/RCT.0000000000000254 pmid:25974719

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Tullberg M,
    3. Hellström P,
    4. Piechnik SK, et al

    . Impaired wakefulness is associated with reduced anterior cingulate CBF in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurol Scand 2004;110:322–30 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2004.00325.x pmid:15476461

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    2. Klinge PM,
    3. Brooks DJ,
    4. Samii A, et al

    . Correlates of local cerebral blood flow (CBF) in normal pressure hydrocephalus patients before and after shunting: a retrospective analysis of [(15)O]H(2)O PET-CBF studies in 65 patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2008;110:369–75 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2007.12.019 pmid:18262344

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
36. 36.↵
    2. Tullberg M,
    3. Ziegelitz D,
    4. Ribbelin S, et al

    . White matter diffusion is higher in Binswanger disease than in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurol Scand 2009;120:226–34 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2009.01165.x pmid:19485951

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    2. Jeppsson A,
    3. Höltta M,
    4. Zetterberg H, et al

    . Amyloid mis-metabolism in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Fluids Barriers CNS 2016;13:13 doi:10.1186/s12987-016-0037-y pmid:27472944

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    2. Nakajima M,
    3. Miyajima M,
    4. Ogino I, et al

    . Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for prognosis of long-term cognitive treatment outcomes in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Sci 2015;357:88–95 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2015.07.001 pmid:26169158

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    2. Ringstad G,
    3. Vatnehol SA,
    4. Eide PK

    . Glymphatic MRI in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Brain 2017;140:2691–705 doi:10.1093/brain/awx191 pmid:28969373

    CrossRefPubMed