Placement of a Stent within a Flow Diverter Improves Aneurysm Occlusion Rates

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Akgul E,
   3. Onan HB,
   4. Akpinar S, et al

   . The DERIVO embolization device in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: short- and midterm results. World Neurosurg 2016;95:229–40 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2016.07.101 pmid:27514698

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Becske T,
   3. Kallmes DF,
   4. Saatci I, et al

   . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Bhogal P,
   3. AlMatter M,
   4. Hellstern V, et al

   . The combined use of intraluminal and intrasaccular flow diversion for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: report of 25 cases. Neurointervention 2018;13:20–31 doi:10.5469/neuroint.2018.13.1.20 pmid:29535895

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Lescher S,
   3. Du Mesnil de Rochemont R,
   4. Berkefeld J

   . Woven Endobridge (WEB) device for endovascular treatment of complex unruptured aneurysms-a single center experience. Neuroradiology 2016;58:383–90 doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1641-x pmid:26767527

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Amuluru K,
   3. Al-Mufti F,
   4. Roth W, et al

   . Anchoring Pipeline flow diverter construct in the treatment of traumatic distal cervical carotid artery injury. Intervent Neurol 2017;6:153–62 doi:10.1159/000457836 pmid:29118792

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Kuhn AL,
   3. Wakhloo AK,
   4. Gounis MJ, et al

   . Use of self-expanding stents for better intracranial flow diverter wall apposition. Interv Neuroradiol 2017;23:129–36 doi:10.1177/1591019916681981 pmid:27956518

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Rahal JP,
   3. Dandamudi VS,
   4. Heller RS, et al

   . Use of concentric Solitaire stent to anchor Pipeline flow diverter constructs in treatment of shallow cervical carotid dissecting pseudoaneurysms. J Clin Neurosci 2014;21:1024–28 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2013.10.017 pmid:24411325

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Kühn AL,
   3. Rodrigues KM,
   4. Wakhloo AK, et al

   . Endovascular techniques for achievement of better flow diverter wall apposition. Interv Neuroradiol 2018;25:344–47 doi:10.1177/1591019918815294 pmid:30486725

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Topcuoglu OM,
   3. Arat A,
   4. Peker A, et al

   . Intermediate catheter placement distal to the cerebral aneurysm during flow diversion embolization with the Surpass device. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:e35 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013662 pmid:29695603

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. De Vries J,
    3. Boogaarts J,
    4. Van Norden A, et al

    . New generation of flow diverter (Surpass) for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a prospective single-center study in 37 patients. Stroke 2013;44:1567–77 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000434 pmid:23686973

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Shapiro M,
    3. Becske T,
    4. Nelson PK

    . Learning from failure: persistence of aneurysms following Pipeline embolization. J Neurosurg 2017;126:578–85 doi:10.3171/2015.12.JNS152065 pmid:27153168

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Kaya T,
    3. Daglioglu E,
    4. Gurkas E, et al

    . Silk device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms, Part 2: factors related to clinical and angiographic outcome. Turk Neurosurg 2016;26:533–37 doi:10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.14760-15.0 pmid:27400099

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Foin N,
    3. Gutierrez-Chico JL,
    4. Nakatani S, et al

    . Incomplete stent apposition causes high shear flow disturbances and delay in neointimal coverage as a function of strut to wall detachment distance: implications for the management of incomplete stent apposition. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:180–89 doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000931 pmid:24642998

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Marosfoi M,
    3. Langan ET,
    4. Strittmatter L, et al

    . In situ tissue engineering: endothelial growth patterns as a function of flow diverter design. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:994–98 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012669 pmid:27707872

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. King RM,
    3. Brooks OW,
    4. Langan ET, et al

    . Communicating malapposition of flow diverters assessed with optical coherence tomography correlates with delayed aneurysm occlusion. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:693–97 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013502 pmid:29127197

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    US Food and Drug Administration. Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data: Surpass Embolization Device 2018; P170024. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf17/P170024B.pdf. Accessed May 12, 2019
17. 17.↵
    2. Souteyrand G,
    3. Amabile N,
    4. Mangin L, et al

    . Mechanisms of stent thrombosis analysed by optical coherence tomography: insights from the national PESTO French registry. Eur Heart J 2016;37:1208–16 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv711 pmid:26757787

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Berge J,
    3. Biondi A,
    4. Machi P, et al

    . Flow-diverter Silk stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 1-year follow-up in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1150–55 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2907 pmid:22300924

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Klisch J,
    3. Turk A,
    4. Turner R, et al

    . Very late thrombosis of flow-diverting constructs after the treatment of large fusiform posterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:627–32 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2571 pmid:21436336

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Oishi H,
    3. Teranishi K,
    4. Nonaka S, et al

    . Symptomatic very delayed parent artery occlusion after flow diversion stent embolization. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2016;56:350–53 doi:10.2176/nmc.cr.2016-0053 pmid:27169622

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Potts MB,
    3. Shapiro M,
    4. Zumofen DW, et al

    . Parent vessel occlusion after Pipeline embolization of cerebral aneurysms of the anterior circulation. J Neurosurg 2017;127:1333–41 doi:10.3171/2016.9.JNS152638 pmid:28059658

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Srinivasan VM,
    3. Carlson AP,
    4. Mokin M, et al

    . Prolapse of the Pipeline embolization device in aneurysms: incidence, management, and outcomes. Neurosurg Focus 2017;42:E16 doi:10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1738 pmid:28565987

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Shapiro M,
    3. Raz E,
    4. Becske T, et al

    . Building multidevice Pipeline constructs of favorable metal coverage: a practical guide. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1556–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3902 pmid:24676003

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Chalouhi N,
    3. Tjoumakaris S,
    4. Starke RM, et al

    . Comparison of flow diversion and coiling in large unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2013;44:2150–54 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001785 pmid:23723311

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Zhou Y,
    4. Yang P, et al

    . Comparison of the flow diverter and stent-assisted coiling in large and giant aneurysms: safety and efficacy based on a propensity score-matched analysis. Eur Radiol 2016;26:2369–77 doi:10.1007/s00330-015-4052-1 pmid:26471273

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Briganti F,
    3. Leone G,
    4. Cirillo L, et al

    . Postprocedural, midterm, and long-term results of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow-diverter devices: 7-year experience at a single center. Neurosurg Focus 2017;42:E3 doi:10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1732 pmid:28565988

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Ocal O,
    3. Arat A,
    4. Peker A, et al

    . Better wall apposition of Surpass device with Atlas stent: a new and easy technique. In: Proceedings of the 14th Congress of the World Federation of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology. Budapest, Hungary. October 16–19, 2017
28. 28.↵
    2. Aguilar Perez M,
    3. Bhogal P,
    4. Martinez Moreno R, et al

    . The Medina Embolic Device: early clinical experience from a single center. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:77–87 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012539 pmid:27484746

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. Nossek E,
    3. Chalif DJ,
    4. Chakraborty S, et al

    . Concurrent use of the Pipeline Embolization Device and coils for intracranial aneurysms: technique, safety, and efficacy. J Neurosurg 2015;122:904–11 doi:10.3171/2014.12.JNS141259 pmid:25658781

    CrossRefPubMed