How Flow Reduction Influences the Intracranial Aneurysm Occlusion: A Prospective 4D Phase-Contrast MRI Study

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Becske T,
   2. Kallmes DF,
   3. Saatci I, et al

   . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Briganti F,
   2. Leone G,
   3. Marseglia M, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms using flow-diverter devices: a systematic review. Neuroradiol J 2015;28:365–75 doi:10.1177/1971400915602803 pmid:26314872

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Brinjikji W,
   2. Murad MH,
   3. Lanzino G, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:442–47 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.678151 pmid:23321438

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Walcott BP,
   2. Stapleton CJ,
   3. Choudhri O, et al

   . Flow diversion for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. JAMA Neurol 2016;73:1002–08 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.0609 pmid:27294446

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Bouillot P,
   2. Brina O,
   3. Ouared R, et al

   . Particle imaging velocimetry evaluation of intracranial stents in sidewall aneurysm: hemodynamic transition related to the stent design. PLoS One 2014;9:e113762 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113762 pmid:25470724

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Bouillot P,
   2. Brina O,
   3. Ouared R, et al

   . Hemodynamic transition driven by stent porosity in sidewall aneurysms. J Biomech 2015;48:1300–09 doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.020

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Eker OF,
   2. Boudjeltia KZ,
   3. Jerez RA, et al

   . MR derived volumetric flow rate waveforms of internal carotid artery in patients treated for unruptured intracranial aneurysms by flow diversion technique. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2015;35:2070–79 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2015.176 pmid:26264871

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Szikora I,
   2. Marosfoi M,
   3. Salomvary B, et al

   . Resolution of mass effect and compression symptoms following endoluminal flow diversion for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:935–39 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3547 pmid:23493889

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Chalouhi N,
   2. Tjoumakaris S,
   3. Starke RM, et al

   . Comparison of flow diversion and coiling in large unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2013;44:2150–54 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001785 pmid:23723311

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Di Maria F,
    2. Pistocchi S,
    3. Clarencon F, et al

    . Flow diversion versus standard endovascular techniques for the treatment of unruptured carotid-ophthalmic aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2325–30 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4437 pmid:26272972

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Delgado Almandoz JE,
    2. Kayan Y,
    3. Tenreiro A, et al

    . Clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with the Pipeline embolization device: intra-procedural technical difficulties, major morbidity, and neurological mortality decrease significantly with increased operator experience in device deployment and patient management. Neuroradiology 2017;59:1291–99 doi:10.1007/s00234-017-1930-z pmid:28986614

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Ikeda H,
    2. Ishii A,
    3. Kikuchi T, et al

    . Delayed aneurysm rupture due to residual blood flow at the inflow zone of the intracranial paraclinoid internal carotid aneurysm treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device: histopathological investigation. Interv Neuroradiol 2015;21:674–83 doi:10.1177/1591019915609121 pmid:26500232

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Kulcsar Z,
    2. Houdart E,
    3. Bonafe A, et al

    . Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:20–25 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2370 pmid:21071538

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Pereira VM,
    2. Bonnefous O,
    3. Ouared R, et al

    . A DSA-based method using contrast-motion estimation for the assessment of the intra-aneurysmal flow changes induced by flow-diverter stents. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:808–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3322 pmid:23124641

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Chien A,
    2. Vinuela F.

    IS FlowMap, a novel tool to examine blood flow changes induced by flow diverter stent treatment: initial experiences with Pipeline cases. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5(Suppl 3):iii43–47 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010613 pmid:23390037

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Kulcsar Z,
    2. Augsburger L,
    3. Reymond P, et al

    . Flow diversion treatment: intra-aneurismal blood flow velocity and WSS reduction are parameters to predict aneurysm thrombosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2012;154:1827–34 doi:10.1007/s00701-012-1482-2 pmid:22926629

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Mut F,
    2. Raschi M,
    3. Scrivano E, et al

    . Association between hemodynamic conditions and occlusion times after flow diversion in cerebral aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:286–90 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011080 pmid:24696500

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Paliwal N,
    2. Damiano RJ,
    3. Davies JM, et al

    . Association between hemodynamic modifications and clinical outcome of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverters. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 2017;10135 doi:10.1117/12.2254584 pmid:28515570

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Wu C,
    2. Ansari SA,
    3. Honarmand AR, et al

    . Evaluation of 4D vascular flow and tissue perfusion in cerebral arteriovenous malformations: influence of Spetzler-Martin grade, clinical presentation, and AVM risk factors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1142–49 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4259 pmid:25721076

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Sindeev S,
    2. Arnold PG,
    3. Frolov S, et al

    . Phase-contrast MRI versus numerical simulation to quantify hemodynamical changes in cerebral aneurysms after flow diverter treatment. PLoS One 2018;13:e0190696 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190696 pmid:29304062

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Karmonik C,
    2. Anderson JR,
    3. Elias S, et al

    . Four-dimensional phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging protocol optimization using patient-specific 3-dimensional printed replicas for in vivo imaging before and after flow diverter placement. World Neurosurg 2017;105:775–82 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.042 pmid:28624566

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Pereira VM,
    2. Brina O,
    3. Delattre BM, et al

    . Assessment of intra-aneurysmal flow modification after flow diverter stent placement with four-dimensional flow MRI: a feasibility study. J Neurointerv Surg Surg 2015;7:913–19 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011348 pmid:25280571

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Bouillot P,
    2. Brina O,
    3. Delattre BMA, et al

    . Neurovascular stent artifacts in 3D-TOF and 3D-PCMR: influence of stent design on flow measurement. Magn Reson Med 2019;81:560–72 doi:10.1002/mrm.27352 pmid:29893989

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Bouillot P,
    2. Delattre BMA,
    3. Brina O, et al

    . 3D phase contrast MRI: partial volume correction for robust blood flow quantification in small intracranial vessels. Magn Reson Med 2018;79:129–40 doi:10.1002/mrm.26637 pmid:28244132

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Ouared R,
    2. Larrabide I,
    3. Brina O, et al

    . Computational fluid dynamics analysis of flow reduction induced by flow-diverting stents in intracranial aneurysms: a patient-unspecific hemodynamics change perspective. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:1288–93 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012154 pmid:26880724

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. O’Kelly CJ,
    2. Krings T,
    3. Fiorella D, et al

    . A novel grading scale for the angiographic assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverting stents. Interv Neuroradiol 2010;16:133–37 doi:10.1177/159101991001600204 pmid:20642887

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Berg P,
    2. Saalfeld S,
    3. Janiga G, et al

    . Virtual stenting of intracranial aneurysms: a pilot study for the prediction of treatment success based on hemodynamic simulations. Int J Artif Organs 2018;41:698–705 doi:10.1177/0391398818775521 pmid:29783867

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Rouchaud A,
    2. Ramana C,
    3. Brinjikji W, et al

    . Wall apposition is a key factor for aneurysm occlusion after flow diversion: a histologic evaluation in 41 rabbits. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:2087–91 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4848 pmid:27390319

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Kadirvel R,
    2. Ding YH,
    3. Dai D, et al

    . Cellular mechanisms of aneurysm occlusion after treatment with a flow diverter. Radiology 2014;270:394–99 doi:10.1148/radiol.13130796 pmid:24086073

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    1. Marosfoi M,
    2. Langan ET,
    3. Strittmatter L, et al

    . In situ tissue engineering: endothelial growth patterns as a function of flow diverter design. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:994–98 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012669 pmid:27707872

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Li Z,
    2. Zhao R,
    3. Fang X, et al

    . Recombinant human SDF-1alpha administration accelerates aneurysm neck reendothelialization in rabbit saccular aneurysm after flow diverter treatment. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 2017;49:246–53 doi:10.1093/abbs/gmx001 pmid:28159982

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Qiu T,
    2. Jin G,
    3. Bao W, et al

    . Intercorrelations of morphology with hemodynamics in intracranial aneurysms in computational fluid dynamics. Neurosciences (Riyadh) 2017;22:205–12 doi:10.17712/nsj.2017.3.20160452 pmid:28678215

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. MacDonald ME,
    2. Dolati P,
    3. Mitha AP, et al

    . Hemodynamic alterations measured with phase-contrast MRI in a giant cerebral aneurysm treated with a flow-diverting stent. Radiol Case Rep 2015;10:1109 doi:10.2484/rcr.v10i2.1109 pmid:27398123

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Frolov SV,
    2. Sindeev SV,
    3. Liepsch D, et al

    . Experimental and CFD flow studies in an intracranial aneurysm model with Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids. Technol Health Care 2016;24:317–33 doi:10.3233/THC-161132 pmid:26835725

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Bouillot P,
    2. Brina O,
    3. Yilmaz H, et al

    . Virtual-versus-real implantation of flow diverters: clinical potential and influence of vascular geometry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:2079–86 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4845 pmid:27365325

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    1. Stankovic Z,
    2. Allen BD,
    3. Garcia J, et al

    . 4D flow imaging with MRI. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2014;4:173–92 doi:10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2014.01.02 pmid:24834414

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Chalouhi N,
    2. Tjoumakaris S,
    3. Phillips JL, et al

    . A single Pipeline embolization device is sufficient for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1562–66 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3957 pmid:24788125

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    1. Markl M,
    2. Frydrychowicz A,
    3. Kozerke S, et al

    . 4D flow MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;36:1015–36 doi:10.1002/jmri.23632 pmid:23090914

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Anderson JR,
    2. Klucznik R,
    3. Diaz O, et al

    . Quantification of velocity reduction after flow diverter placement in intracranial aneurysm: an ex vivo study with 3D printed replicas. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2015;2015:7300–03 doi:10.1109/EMBC.2015.7320077 pmid:26737977

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Gester K,
    2. Luchtefeld I,
    3. Busen M, et al

    . In vitro evaluation of intra-aneurysmal, flow-diverter-induced thrombus formation: a feasibility study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:490–96 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4555 pmid:26450536

    Abstract/FREE Full Text