A Deep Learning–Based Approach to Reduce Rescan and Recall Rates in Clinical MRI Examinations

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Andre JB,
   3. Bresnahan BW,
   4. Mossa-Basha M, et al

   . Toward quantifying the prevalence, severity, and cost associated with patient motion during clinical MR examinations. J Am Coll Radiol 2015;12:689–95 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2015.03.007 pmid:25963225

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Pizarro RA,
   3. Cheng X,
   4. Barnett A, et al

   . Automated quality assessment of structural magnetic resonance brain images based on a supervised machine learning 28066227 algorithm. Front Neuroinform 2016;10:52 95 doi:10.3389/fninf.2016.0005295 pmid:28066227

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Hagens MH,
   3. Burggraaff J,
   4. Kilsdonk ID, et al

   . Impact of 3 Tesla MRI on interobserver agreement in clinically isolated syndrome: a MAGNIMS multicentre study. Mult Scler 2018 Jan 1. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1177/1352458517751647 pmid:29327668

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Gatidis S,
   3. Liebgott A,
   4. Schwartz M, et al

   . Automated reference-free assessment of MR image quality using an active learning approach: comparison of support vector machine versus deep neural network classification. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii. April 22–27, 2017; 3979
5. 5.↵
   2. Elsaid N,
   3. Roys S,
   4. Stone M, et al

   . Phase-based motion detection for diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii. April 22–27, 2017; 1288
6. 6.↵
   2. Kelly C,
   3. Pietsch M,
   4. Counsell S, et al

   . Transfer learning and convolutional neural net fusion for motion artefact detection. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii. April 22–27, 2017; 3523
7. 7.↵
   2. Hirsch J,
   3. Kohn A,
   4. Hoinkiss D, et al

   . Quality assessment in the multicenter MR imaging study of the German national cohort. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii. April 22–27, 2017; 4458
8. 8.↵
   2. Guehring J,
   3. Weale P,
   4. Zuehlsdorff S

   , inventors. System for dynamically improving medical image acquisition quality. US patent US 8,520,920 B2, 2010
9. 9.↵
   2. Blumenthal JD,
   3. Zijdenbos A,
   4. Molloy E, et al

   . Motion artifact in magnetic resonance imaging: implications for automated analysis. Neuroimage 2002;16:89–92 doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1076 pmid:11969320

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Kelly C

    . Transfer learning and convolutional neural net fusion for motion artifact detection. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii. April 22–27, 2017; 3523
11. 11.↵
    2. Lorch B,
    3. Vaillant G,
    4. Baumgartner C, et al

    . Automated detection of motion artefacts in MR imaging using decision forests. J Med Eng 2017;2017:4501647 doi:10.1155/2017/4501647 pmid:28695126

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Meding K,
    3. Lokyushin A,
    4. Hirsch M

    . Automatic detection of motion artifacts in MR images using CNNS. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, New Orleans, Louisiana. March 5–9, 2017
13. 13.↵
    2. Küstner T,
    3. Liebgott A,
    4. Mauch L, et al

    . Automated reference-free detection of motion artifacts in magnetic resonance images. MAGMA 2018;31:243–56 doi:10.1007/s10334-017-0650-z pmid:28932991

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Esses S,
    3. Lu X,
    4. Zhao T, et al

    . Automated image quality evaluation of T2-weighted liver MRI utilizing deep learning architecture. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018;47:723–28 doi:10.1002/jmri.25779 pmid:28577329

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    Chollet F. Keras Documentation. 2017 https://keras.io/. Accessed December 5, 2018
16. 16.↵
    2. He K,
    3. Zhang X,
    4. Ren S, et al

    . Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, Nevada. June 26 to July 1, 2016
17. 17.↵
    2. Karpathy A

    . Convolutional Neural Networks for Visual Recognition. 2018 http://cs231n.github.io/. Accessed December 9, 2018