Assessment of Explicitly Stated Interval Change on Noncontrast Head CT Radiology Reports

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Cynthia JS,
   3. Marks A,
   4. Leonard B, et al

   . ACR practice parameter for communication of diagnostic imaging findings. https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/CommunicationDiag.pdf. Accessed February 27, 2019.
2. 2.↵
   2. Ganeshan D,
   3. Duong PAT,
   4. Probyn L, et al

   . Structured reporting in radiology. Acad Radiol 2018;25:66–73 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2017.08.005 pmid:29030284

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Hassanpour S,
   3. Bay G,
   4. Langlotz CP

   . Characterization of change and significance for clinical findings in radiology reports through natural language processing. J Digit Imaging 2017;30:314–22 doi:10.1007/s10278-016-9931-8 pmid:28050714

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Berlin L

   . Comparing new radiographs with those obtained previously. Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:3–6 doi:10.2214/ajr.172.1.9888727 pmid:9888727

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Wallis A,
   3. McCoubrie P

   . The radiology report: are we getting the message across? Clin Radiol 2011;66:1015–22 doi:10.1016/j.crad.2011.05.013 pmid:21788016

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Gore A,
   3. Hoch MJ,
   4. Shu HG, et al

   . Institutional implementation of a structured reporting system: our experience with the brain tumor reporting and data system. Acad Radiol 2019 Jan 17. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1016/j.acra.2018.12.023 pmid:30661977

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Cunqueiro A,
   3. Scheinfeld MH

   . Causes of pneumocephalus and when to be concerned about it. Emerg Radiol 2018;25:331–40 doi:10.1007/s10140-018-1595-x pmid:29546674

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Pandharipande PV,
   3. Herts BR,
   4. Gore RM, et al

   . Rethinking normal: benefits and risks of not reporting harmless incidental findings. J Am Coll Radiol 2016;13:764–67 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2016.03.017 pmid:27162042

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Geerlings MI,
   3. Appelman AP,
   4. Vincken KL, et al

   ; SMART Study Group. Association of white matter lesions and lacunar infarcts with executive functioning: the SMART-MR study. Am J Epidemiol 2009;170:1147–55 doi:10.1093/aje/kwp256 pmid:19783584

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Xiong YY,
    3. Mok V

    . Age-related white matter changes. J Aging Res 2011;2011:617927 doi:10.4061/2011/617927 pmid:21876810

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Deutschmann MW,
    3. Yeung J,
    4. Bosch M, et al

    . Radiologic reporting for paranasal sinus computed tomography: a multi-institutional review of content and consistency. Laryngoscope 2013;123:1100–05 doi:10.1002/lary.23906 pmid:23619621

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Becker SS,
    3. O'Malley BB

    . Evaluation of sinus computed tomography scans: a collaborative approach between radiology and otolaryngology. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;21:69–73 doi:10.1097/MOO.0b013e32835b09b7 pmid:23299121

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Yang W,
    3. Wei Z,
    4. Wang JY, et al

    . Long-term outcomes of patients with giant intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 2016;79:116–24 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000001189 pmid:26695091

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Paul AR,
    3. Colby GP,
    4. Huang J, et al

    . Selection of treatment modalities or observation of dural arteriovenous fistulas. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2012;23:77–85 doi:10.1016/j.nec.2011.09.004 pmid:22107860

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Sorenson TJ,
    3. Brinjikji W,
    4. Bortolotti C, et al

    . Recurrent brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs): a systematic review. World Neurosurg 2018;116:e856–66 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.117 pmid:29807175

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Reiter K,
    3. Nielson KA,
    4. Durgerian S, et al

    . Five-year longitudinal brain volume change in healthy elders at genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis 2017;55:1363–77 doi:10.3233/JAD-160504 pmid:27834774

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Okonkwo OC,
    3. Alosco ML,
    4. Jerskey BA, et al

    ; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Cerebral atrophy, apolipoprotein E varepsilon4, and rate of decline in everyday function among patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimers Dement 2010;6:404–11 doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2010.02.003 pmid:20813341

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Nedelska Z,
    3. Ferman TJ,
    4. Boeve BF, et al

    . Pattern of brain atrophy rates in autopsy-confirmed dementia with Lewy bodies. Neurobiol Aging 2015;36:452–61 doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.07.005 pmid:25128280

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    European Society of Radiology (ESR). ESR paper on structured reporting in radiology. Insights Imaging 2018;9:1–7 doi:10.1007/s13244-017-0588-8 pmid:29460129

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Franconeri A,
    3. Fang J,
    4. Carney B, et al

    . Structured vs narrative reporting of pelvic MRI for fibroids: clarity and impact on treatment planning. Eur Radiol 2018;28:3009–17 doi:10.1007/s00330-017-5161-9 pmid:29247353

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Tuncyurek O,
    3. Garces-Descovich A,
    4. Jaramillo-Cardoso A, et al

    . Structured versus narrative reporting of pelvic MRI in perianal fistulizing disease: impact on clarity, completeness, and surgical planning. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019;44:811–20 doi:10.1007/s00261-018-1858-8 pmid:30519819

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Bosmans JML,
    3. Weyler JJ,
    4. Parizel PM

    . Structure and content of radiology reports, a quantitative and qualitative study in eight medical centers. Eur J Radiol 2009;72:354–58 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.023 pmid:18667286

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Park SB,
    3. Kim MJ,
    4. Ko Y, et al

    . Structured reporting versus free-text reporting for appendiceal computed tomography in adolescents and young adults: preference survey of 594 referring physicians, surgeons, and radiologists from 20 hospitals. Korean J Radiol 2019;20:246–55 doi:10.3348/kjr2018:0109 pmid:30672164

    CrossRefPubMed