Long-Term Results and Follow-Up Examinations after Endovascular Embolization for Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Molyneux AJ,
   3. Birks J,
   4. Clarke A, et al

   . The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18-year follow-up of the UK cohort of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Lancet 2015;385:691–97 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60975-2 pmid:25465111

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Oishi H,
   3. Yamamoto M,
   4. Shimizu T, et al

   . Endovascular therapy of 500 small asymptomatic unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:958–64 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2858 pmid:22241382

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Murayama Y,
   3. Nien YL,
   4. Duckwiler G, et al

   . Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years' experience. J Neurosurg 2003;98:959–66 doi:10.3171/jns.2003.98.5.0959 pmid:12744354

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Raymond J,
   3. Guilbert F,
   4. Weill A, et al

   . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000073841.88563.E9 pmid:12775880

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Gallas S,
   3. Pasco A,
   4. Cottier JP, et al

   . A multicenter study of 705 ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1723–31 pmid:16091521

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Geyik S,
   3. Yavuz K,
   4. Ergun O, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with bioactive Cerecyte coils: effects on treatment stability. Neuroradiology 2008;50:787–93 doi:10.1007/s00234-008-0399-1 pmid:18483727

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   2. Ries T,
   3. Siemonsen S,
   4. Thomalla G, et al

   . Long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms after endovascular therapy prediction and outcome of retreatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1755–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0649 pmid:17885238

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Renowden SA,
   3. Koumellis P,
   4. Benes V, et al

   . Retreatment of previously embolized cerebral aneurysms: the risk of further coil embolization does not negate the advantage of the initial embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1401–04 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1098 pmid:18436614

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Campi A,
   3. Ramzi N,
   4. Molyneux AJ, et al

   . Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 2007;38:1538–44 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.466987 pmid:17395870

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Gallas S,
    3. Januel AC,
    4. Pasco A, et al

    . Long-term follow-up of 1036 cerebral aneurysms treated by bare coils: a multicentric cohort treated between 1998 and 2003. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1986–92 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1744 pmid:19679641

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. van Amerongen MJ,
    3. Boogaarts HD,
    4. de Vries J, et al

    . MRA versus DSA for follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1655–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3700 pmid:24008171

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    Nihon-nousottyuu-gakkai. Nousottyuu-guidline-iinkai. Nousottyuu-tiryou-guidline (in Japanese). 2015. Kyouwakikaku, Tokyo; 2015;230–35
13. 13.↵
    2. Roy D,
    3. Milot G,
    4. Raymond J

    . Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke 2001;32:1998–2004 doi:10.1161/hs0901.095600 pmid:11546888

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Piotin M,
    3. Spelle L,
    4. Mounayer C, et al

    . Intracranial aneurysms: treatment with bare platinum coils—aneurysm packing, complex coils, and angiographic recurrence. Radiology 2007;243:500–08 doi:10.1148/radiol.2431060006 pmid:17293572

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Sluzewski M,
    3. Menovsky T,
    4. van Rooij WJ, et al

    . Coiling of very large or giant cerebral aneurysms: long-term clinical and serial angiographic results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:257–62 pmid:12591644

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Koyanagi M,
    3. Ishii A,
    4. Imamura H

    . Long-term outcomes of coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2018;129:1492–98 doi:10.3171/2017.6.JNS17174 pmid:29303448

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Li MH,
    3. Gao BL,
    4. Fang C, et al

    . Angiographic follow-up of cerebral aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: an analysis of 162 cases with 173 aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1107–12 pmid:16687553

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Tamatani S,
    3. Ito Y,
    4. Abe H, et al

    . Evaluation of the stability of aneurysms after embolization using detachable coils: correlation between stability of aneurysms and embolized volume of aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:762–67 pmid:12006273

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Sugiyama S,
    3. Niizuma K,
    4. Sato K, et al

    . Blood flow into basilar tip aneurysms: a predictor for recanalization after coil embolization. Stroke 2016;47:2541–47 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013555 pmid:27625377

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Nguyen TN,
    3. Hoh BL,
    4. Amin-Hanjani S, et al

    . Comparison of ruptured vs unruptured aneurysms in recanalization after coil embolization. Surg Neurol 2007;68:19–23 doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2006.10.021 pmid:17586214

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Bavinzski G,
    3. Talazoglu V,
    4. Killer M, et al

    . Gross and microscopic histopathological findings in aneurysms of the human brain treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. J Neurosurg 1999;91:284–93 doi:10.3171/jns.1999.91.2.0284 pmid:10433317

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Holmin S,
    3. Krings T,
    4. Ozanne A, et al

    . Intradural saccular aneurysms treated by Guglielmi detachable bare coils at a single institution between 1993 and 2005: clinical long-term follow-up for a total of 1810 patient-years in relation to morphological treatment results. Stroke 2008;39:2288–97 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.508234 pmid:18583562

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Sonobe M,
    3. Yamazaki T,
    4. Yonekura M, et al

    . Small unruptured intracranial aneurysm verification study: SUAVe study, Japan. Stroke 2010;41:1969–77 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.585059 pmid:20671254

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Anzalone N,
    3. Scomazzoni F,
    4. Cirillo M, et al

    . Follow-up of coiled cerebral aneurysms at 3T: comparison of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1530–36 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1166 pmid:18556359

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Kaufmann TJ,
    3. Huston J 3rd.,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al

    . A prospective trial of 3T and 1.5T time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:912–18 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1932 pmid:20019107

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Choi JW,
    3. Roh HG,
    4. Moon WJ, et al

    . Time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MRA on 3.0T: a non-invasive follow-up technique after stent-assisted coil embolization of the intracranial aneurysm. Korean J Radiol 2011;12:662–70 doi:10.3348/kjr.2011.12.6.662 pmid:22043147

    CrossRefPubMed