Risk Factors for Perceptual-versus-Interpretative Errors in Diagnostic Neuroradiology

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Makary MA,
   3. Daniel M

   . Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ 2016;353:i2139 doi:10.1136/bmj.i2139 pmid:27143499

   FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Bruno MA,
   3. Walker EA,
   4. Abujudeh HH

   . Understanding and confronting our mistakes: the epidemiology of error in radiology and strategies for error reduction. Radiographics 2015;35:1668–76 doi:10.1148/rg.2015150023 pmid:26466178

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Brook OR,
   3. O'Connell AM,
   4. Thornton E, et al

   . Quality initiatives: anatomy and pathophysiology of errors occurring in clinical radiology practice. Radiographics 2010;30:1401–10 doi:10.1148/rg.305105013 pmid:20622192

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Fitzgerald R

   . Error in radiology. Clin Radiol 2001;56:938–46 doi:10.1053/crad.2001.0858 pmid:11795921

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Itri JN,
   3. Tappouni RR,
   4. McEachern RO, et al

   . Fundamentals of diagnostic error in imaging. Radiographics 2018;38:1845–65 doi:10.1148/rg.2018180021 pmid:30303801

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Donald JJ,
   3. Barnard SA

   . Common patterns in 558 diagnostic radiology errors. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2012;56:173–78 doi:10.1111/j.1754-9485.2012.02348.x pmid:22498190

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Kabadi SJ,
   3. Krishnaraj A

   . Strategies for improving the value of the radiology report: a retrospective analysis of errors in formally over-read studies. J Am Coll Radiol 2017;14:459–66 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2016.08.033 pmid:27884632

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Renfrew DL,
   3. Franken EA Jr.,
   4. Berbaum KS, et al

   . Error in radiology: classification and lessons in 182 cases presented at a problem case conference. Radiology 1992;183:145–50 doi:10.1148/radiology.183.1.1549661 pmid:1549661

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Cooper VF,
   3. Goodhartz LA,
   4. Nemcek AA Jr., et al

   . Radiology resident interpretations of on-call imaging studies: the incidence of major discrepancies. Acad Radiol 2008;15:1198–204 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2008.02.011 pmid:18692761

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Erly WK,
    3. Berger WG,
    4. Krupinski E, et al

    . Radiology resident evaluation of head CT scan orders in the emergency department. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:103–07 pmid:11827881

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Filippi CG,
    3. Schneider B,
    4. Burbank HN, et al

    . Discrepancy rates of radiology resident interpretations of on-call neuroradiology MR imaging studies. Radiology 2008;249:972–79 doi:10.1148/radiol.2493071543 pmid:19011191

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Funaki B,
    3. Szymski GX,
    4. Rosenblum JD

    . Significant on-call misses by radiology residents interpreting computed tomographic studies: perception versus cognition. Emerg Radiol 1997;4:290–94 doi:10.1007/BF01461735

    CrossRef
13. 13.↵
    2. Goradia D,
    3. Blackmore CC,
    4. Talner LB, et al

    . Predicting radiology resident errors in diagnosis of cervical spine fractures. Acad Radiol 2005;12:888–93 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2005.04.004 pmid:16039542

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Guimaraes CV,
    3. Leach JL,
    4. Jones BV

    . Trainee misinterpretations on pediatric neuroimaging studies: classification, imaging analysis, and outcome assessment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1591–99 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2567 pmid:21835948

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Hillier JC,
    3. Tattersall DJ,
    4. Gleeson FV

    . Trainee reporting of computed tomography examinations: do they make mistakes and does it matter? Clin Radiol 2004;59:159–62, discussion 157–58 pmid:14746785

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Lal NR,
    3. Murray UM,
    4. Eldevik OP, et al

    . Clinical consequences of misinterpretations of neuroradiologic CT scans by on-call radiology residents. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:124–29 pmid:10669236

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Meyer RE,
    3. Nickerson JP,
    4. Burbank HN, et al

    . Discrepancy rates of on-call radiology residents' interpretations of CT angiography studies of the neck and circle of Willis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:527–32 doi:10.2214/AJR.08.2169 pmid:19620452

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Miyakoshi A,
    3. Nguyen QT,
    4. Cohen WA, et al

    . Accuracy of preliminary interpretation of neurologic CT examinations by on-call radiology residents and assessment of patient outcomes at a level I trauma center. J Am Coll Radiol 2009;6:864–70 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2009.07.021 pmid:19945042

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Strub WM,
    3. Leach JL,
    4. Tomsick T, et al

    . Overnight preliminary head CT interpretations provided by residents: locations of misidentified intracranial hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1679–82 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0653 pmid:17885236

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Walls J,
    3. Hunter N,
    4. Brasher PM, et al

    . The DePICTORS Study: discrepancies in preliminary interpretation of CT scans between on-call residents and staff. Emerg Radiol 2009;16:303–08 doi:10.1007/s10140-009-0795-9 pmid:19184142

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Wysoki MG,
    3. Nassar CJ,
    4. Koenigsberg RA, et al

    . Head trauma: CT scan interpretation by radiology residents versus staff radiologists. Radiology 1998;208:125–28 doi:10.1148/radiology.208.1.9646802 pmid:9646802

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Erly WK,
    3. Ashdown BC,
    4. Lucio RW 2nd., et al

    . Evaluation of emergency CT scans of the head: is there a community standard? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:1727–30 doi:10.2214/ajr.180.6.1801727 pmid:12760951

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Jordan MJ,
    3. Lightfoote JB,
    4. Jordan JE

    . Quality outcomes of reinterpretation of brain CT imaging studies by subspecialty experts in neuroradiology. J Natl Med Assoc 2006;98:1326–28 pmid:16916131

    PubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Loevner LA,
    3. Sonners AI,
    4. Schulman BJ, et al

    . Reinterpretation of cross-sectional images in patients with head and neck cancer in the setting of a multidisciplinary cancer center. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1622–26 pmid:12427610

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Zan E,
    3. Yousem DM,
    4. Carone M, et al

    . Second-opinion consultations in neuroradiology. Radiology 2010;255:135–41 doi:10.1148/radiol.09090831 pmid:20308451

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. González RG,
    3. Schwamm LH

    . Imaging acute ischemic stroke. Handb Clin Neurol 2016;135:293–315 doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-53485-9.00016-7 pmid:27432672

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Higer HP,
    3. Pedrosa P,
    4. Schuth M

    . MR imaging of cerebral tumors: state of the art and work in progress. Neurosurg Rev 1989;12:91–106 doi:10.1007/BF01741480 pmid:2674770

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Young IR,
    3. Hall AS,
    4. Pallis CA, et al

    . Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in multiple sclerosis. Lancet 1981;2:1063–66 pmid:6118521

    PubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Krupinski EA

    . The role of perception in imaging: past and future. Semin Nucl Med 2011;41:392–400 doi:10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2011.05.002 pmid:21978443

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Bahrami S,
    3. Yim CM

    . Quality initiatives: blind spots at brain imaging. Radiographics 2009;29:1877–96 doi:10.1148/rg.297095123 pmid:19734470

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Mullins ME,
    3. Lev MH,
    4. Schellingerhout D, et al

    . Influence of availability of clinical history on detection of early stroke using unenhanced CT and diffusion-weighted MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:223–28 doi:10.2214/ajr.179.1.1790223 pmid:12076941

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Knake S,
    3. Triantafyllou C,
    4. Wald LL, et al

    . 3T phased array MRI improves the presurgical evaluation in focal epilepsies: a prospective study. Neurology 2005;65:1026–31 doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000179355.04481.3c pmid:16217054

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Krupinski EA,
    3. Berbaum KS,
    4. Caldwell RT, et al

    . Long radiology workdays reduce detection and accommodation accuracy. J Am Coll Radiol 2010;7:698–704 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2010.03.004 pmid:20816631

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Krupinski EA,
    3. Berbaum KS,
    4. Caldwell RT, et al

    . Do long radiology workdays affect nodule detection in dynamic CT interpretation? J Am Coll Radiol 2012;9:191–98 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2011.11.013 pmid:22386166

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Maldonado MD,
    3. Batchala P,
    4. Ornan D, et al

    . Features of diffuse gliomas that are misdiagnosed on initial neuroimaging: a case control study. J Neurooncol 2018;140:107–13 doi:10.1007/s11060-018-2939-9 pmid:29959694

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    2. Lee CS,
    3. Nagy PG,
    4. Weaver SJ, et al

    . Cognitive and system factors contributing to diagnostic errors in radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:611–17 doi:10.2214/AJR.12.10375 pmid:23971454

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    2. Lauritzen PM,
    3. Andersen JG,
    4. Stokke MV, et al

    . Radiologist-initiated double reading of abdominal CT: retrospective analysis of the clinical importance of changes to radiology reports. BMJ Qual Saf 2016;25:595–603 doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004536 pmid:27013638

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. 38.↵
    2. Lauritzen PM,
    3. Stavem K,
    4. Andersen JG, et al

    . Double reading of current chest CT examinations: clinical importance of changes to radiology reports. Eur J Radiol 2016;85:199–204 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.11.012 pmid:26724666

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    2. Busby LP,
    3. Courtier JL,
    4. Glastonbury CM

    . Bias in radiology: the how and why of misses and misinterpretations. Radiographics 2018;38:236–47 doi:10.1148/rg.2018170107 pmid:29194009

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    2. Babiarz LS,
    3. Yousem DM

    . Quality control in neuroradiology: discrepancies in image interpretation among academic neuroradiologists. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:37–42 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2704 pmid:22033725

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
41. 41.↵
    2. Krupinski EA

    . Current perspectives in medical image perception. Atten Percept Psychophys 2010;72:1205–17 doi:10.3758/APP.72.5.1205 pmid:20601701

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    2. Itri JN,
    3. Patel SH

    . Heuristics and cognitive error in medical imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018;210:1097–105 doi:10.2214/AJR.17.18907 pmid:29528716

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    2. Patel SH,
    3. Ambrosino MM,
    4. McGuinness G

    . The challenging case conference: initial observations and feedback. J Am Coll Radiol 2012;9:666–68 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2012.04.010 pmid:22954551

    CrossRefPubMed