Evaluating Tissue Contrast and Detecting White Matter Injury in the Infant Brain: A Comparison Study of Synthetic Phase-Sensitive Inversion Recovery

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Christophe C,
   3. Muller MF,
   4. Balériaux D, et al

   . Mapping of normal brain maturation in infants on phase-sensitive inversion-recovery MR images. Neuroradiology 1990;32:173–78 doi:10.1007/BF00589106 pmid:2215899

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Lee SM,
   3. Choi YH,
   4. Cheon JE, et al

   . Image quality at synthetic brain magnetic resonance imaging in children. Pediatr Radiol 2017;47:1638–47 doi:10.1007/s00247-017-3913-y pmid:28638982

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Kim HG,
   3. Moon WJ,
   4. Han J, et al

   . Quantification of myelin in children using multiparametric quantitative MRI: a pilot study. Neuroradiology 2017;59:1043–51 doi:10.1007/s00234-017-1889-9 pmid:28765995

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Paus T,
   3. Collins DL,
   4. Evans AC, et al

   . Maturation of white matter in the human brain: a review of magnetic resonance studies. Brain Res Bull 2001;54:255–66 doi:10.1016/S0361-9230(00)00434-2 pmid:11287130

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Neil J,
   3. Miller J,
   4. Mukherjee P, et al

   . Diffusion tensor imaging of normal and injured developing human brain: a technical review. NMR Biomed 2002;15:543–52 doi:10.1002/nbm.784 pmid:12489100

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Favaretto A,
   3. Poggiali D,
   4. Lazzarotto A, et al

   . The parallel analysis of phase sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) and double inversion recovery (DIR) images significantly improves the detection of cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis (MS) since clinical onset. PLoS One 2015;10:e0127805 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127805 pmid:26010425

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Nelson F,
   3. Poonawalla AH,
   4. Hou P, et al

   . Improved identification of intracortical lesions in multiple sclerosis with phase-sensitive inversion recovery in combination with fast double inversion recovery MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1645–49 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0645 pmid:17885241

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Harel A,
   3. Ceccarelli A,
   4. Farrell C, et al

   . Phase-sensitive inversion-recovery MRI improves longitudinal cortical lesion detection in progressive MS. PLoS One 2016;11:e0152180 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152180 pmid:27002529

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Wallaert L,
   3. Hagiwara A,
   4. Andica C, et al

   . The advantage of synthetic MRI for the visualization of anterior temporal pole lesions on double inversion recovery (DIR), phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR), and myelin images in a patient with CADASIL. Magn Reson Med Sci 2017;17:275–76 doi:10.2463/mrms.ci.2017-0110 pmid:29238005

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Betts AM,
    3. Leach JL,
    4. Jones BV, et al

    . Brain imaging with synthetic MR in children: clinical quality assessment. Neuroradiology 2016;58:1017–26 doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1723-9 pmid:27438803

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Riederer SJ,
    3. Suddarth SA,
    4. Bobman SA, et al

    . Automated MR image synthesis: feasibility studies. Radiology 1984;153:203–06 doi:10.1148/radiology.153.1.6089265 pmid:6089265

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Krauss W,
    3. Gunnarsson M,
    4. Nilsson M, et al

    . Conventional and synthetic MRI in multiple sclerosis: a comparative study. Eur Radiol 2018;28:1692–700 doi:10.1007/s00330-017-5100-9 pmid:29134354

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Rutherford M,
    3. Biarge MM,
    4. Allsop J, et al

    . MRI of perinatal brain injury. Pediatr Radiol 2010;40:819–33 doi:10.1007/s00247-010-1620-z pmid:20432000

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Woodward LJ,
    3. Anderson PJ,
    4. Austin NC, et al

    . Neonatal MRI to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2006;355:685–94 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa053792 pmid:16914704

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Ramenghi LA,
    3. Fumagalli M,
    4. Righini A, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of brain maturation in preterm neonates with punctate white matter lesions. Neuroradiology 2007;49:161–67 doi:10.1007/s00234-006-0176-y pmid:17119946

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Forslin Y,
    3. Bergendal Å,
    4. Hashim F, et al

    . Detection of leukocortical lesions in multiple sclerosis and their association with physical and cognitive impairment: a comparison of conventional and synthetic phase-sensitive inversion recovery MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1995–2000 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5815 pmid:30262646

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Warntjes JB,
    3. Leinhard OD,
    4. West J, et al

    . Rapid magnetic resonance quantification on the brain: optimization for clinical usage. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:320–29 doi:10.1002/mrm.21635 pmid:18666127

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Andica C,
    3. Hagiwara A,
    4. Nakazawa M, et al

    . The advantage of synthetic MRI for the visualization of early white matter change in an infant with Sturge-Weber syndrome. Magn Reson Med Sci 2016;15:347–48 doi:10.2463/mrms.ci.2015-0164 pmid:27001386

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Granberg T,
    3. Uppman M,
    4. Hashim F, et al

    . Clinical feasibility of synthetic MRI in multiple sclerosis: a diagnostic and volumetric validation study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1023–29 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4665 pmid:26797137

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Hou P,
    3. Hasan KM,
    4. Sitton CW, et al

    . Phase-sensitive T1 inversion recovery imaging: a time-efficient interleaved technique for improved tissue contrast in neuroimaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1432–38 pmid:15956512

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Rinaldi F,
    3. Calabrese M,
    4. Grossi P, et al

    . Cortical lesions and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Neurol Sci 2010;31:S235–37 doi:10.1007/s10072-010-0368-4 pmid:20635113

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Laule C,
    3. Vavasour IM,
    4. Kolind SH, et al

    . Magnetic resonance imaging of myelin. Neurotherapeutics 2007;4:460–84 doi:10.1016/j.nurt.2007.05.004 pmid:17599712

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Barkovich AJ,
    3. Kjos BO,
    4. Jackson DE Jr., et al

    . Normal maturation of the neonatal and infant brain: MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1988;166:173–80 doi:10.1148/radiology.166.1.3336675 pmid:3336675

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Welker KM,
    3. Patton A

    . Assessment of normal myelination with magnetic resonance imaging. Semin Neurol 2012;32:15–28 doi:10.1055/s-0032-1306382 pmid:22422203

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Mansfield P,
    3. Morris PG

    . NMR Imaging in Biomedicine. New York: Academic Press; 1982:ix, 10–30
26. 26.↵
    2. Wisnowski JL,
    3. Schmithorst VJ,
    4. Rosser T, et al

    . Magnetic resonance spectroscopy markers of axons and astrogliosis in relation to specific features of white matter injury in preterm infants. Neuroradiology 2014;56:771–79 doi:10.1007/s00234-014-1380-9 pmid:24903580

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Niwa T,
    3. de Vries LS,
    4. Benders MJ, et al

    . Punctate white matter lesions in infants: new insights using susceptibility-weighted imaging. Neuroradiology 2011;53:669–79 doi:10.1007/s00234-011-0872-0 pmid:21553013

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Kersbergen KJ,
    3. Benders MJ,
    4. Groenendaal F, et al

    . Different patterns of punctate white matter lesions in serially scanned preterm infants. PLoS One 2014;9:e108904 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0108904 pmid:25279755

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Hanlo PW,
    3. Gooskens RJ,
    4. van Schooneveld M, et al

    . The effect of intracranial pressure on myelination and the relationship with neurodevelopment in infantile hydrocephalus. Dev Med Child Neurol 1997;39:286–91 pmid:9236693

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Bobman SA,
    3. Riederer SJ,
    4. Lee JN, et al

    . Cerebral magnetic resonance image synthesis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1985;6:265–69 pmid:2984911

    Abstract/FREE Full Text